Anyone planning to wager on Tiger Woods to win the Masters?

[gynecologist]

If so, what book is offering the best odds.. lets use this thread as a reference.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->__________________

 

[gynecologist]

BOOKMAKER: +170
GREEK: +215
Bet JAM: +225 (+120 to finish in top 2)
WSEX: +200
5 DIMES: +250
MATCHBOOK +250

 

[Brock]

I played a match up at betj.
Tiger -260 vrs Phil Mcl

 

[johnboland]

Some other cool props at five dimes.
Woods/Michelson win tournament +162
Tiger Woods Top Twenty Finish +540
Hole in One +170
Playoff +290
Low Round O/U 66 1/2 +100
Tiger Woods Hole In One +7000

 

[jerbeek]

I think you mistyped that prop:

Tiger Woods top 20 finish +540

Should that be Tiger will not finish in top 20?

 

[Kruser6]

Some other cool props at five dimes.
Woods/Michelson win tournament +162
Tiger Woods Top Twenty Finish +540
Hole in One +170
Playoff +290
Low Round O/U 66 1/2 +100
Tiger Woods Hole In One +7000

You must have the odds wrong on the Woods top 20 finish?


Haha, I wasn't the first one to read that!

 

[whalewager]

yes it should

 

[offshoresports]

BetSportsWeb
+210 to win Masters
+425 First Round Leader
+130 Top 2

 

[offshoresports]

Some other cool props at five dimes.
Woods/Michelson win tournament +162
Tiger Woods Top Twenty Finish +540
Hole in One +170
Playoff +290
Low Round O/U 66 1/2 +100
Tiger Woods Hole In One +7000

Are these your numbers? You must mean -540 top 20...right?

GYN what and who do you like for the masters? I'm assuming your on Woods...

 

[gynecologist]

Thinking about Woods at +250

 

[johnboland]

Very Sorry for the confusion golf fans. It is Tiger Woods NOT a top 20 finish +540. Thanks for catching the typo. I will concentrate of proof reading information I relay in future posts.

 

[terps1313]

Since 97 (his 1st Masters win) Tiger has won 4 out of 12 Masters. Being that he is +250, you can say there is minimal value there. That being said, I don't think his game is totally there yet. His win at Bay Hill while exciting was far from impressive. I think people assume he dominates this tourney more then he really does. So it would be a no play for me.

 

[offshoresports]

Woods could win for sure, its pretty wide open and should be a great Masters. Would be awesome finding another Zack Johnson out there...lol.

 

[Piranha]

Since 97 (his 1st Masters win) Tiger has won 4 out of 12 Masters. Being that he is +250, you can say there is minimal value there. That being said, I don't think his game is totally there yet. His win at Bay Hill while exciting was far from impressive. I think people assume he dominates this tourney more then he really does. So it would be a no play for me.

I agree, give him another month and than I would say he would be on top of his game.

He won't finish in the top 5..........6th to 10th at best.

 

[Teddykgb]

<table border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="80%"><tbody><tr><td class="historyTableCell" nowrap="nowrap"> 4/8/2009 9:08 PM </td><td class="historyTableCell" nowrap="nowrap"> Future/Prop </td><td class="historyTableCell" align="right"> 100.00 </td><td class="historyTableCell" align="right" nowrap="nowrap"> 2,000.00 </td><td class="historyTableCell" nowrap="nowrap"> 2009 Tiger Woods Major Prop - Exactly how many majors will Tiger win in 2009 - Exactly 4 Majors +2000</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[5teamparlay]

Update

2 shots back


8 (par 3, 235 yards): At the longest par 3 on the course, Woods hits a terrific tee shot inside 12 feet. His birdie attempt looks good -- in fact, Tiger start to walk it in -- but hits the left side of the cup and lips out. Taps in for par. Position: T4, two shots behind Casey.

 

[REDEYE]

He's not winning the Masters.. not sure what some of you are on..

 

[Greenbacks]

He's not winning the Masters.. not sure what some of you are on..

This thread was started in 2009...lol

 

[REDEYE]

This thread was started in 2009...lol

I know it was. Just saw the thread , and why our guy brought this thread back to life

 

[Jstack34]

He's not winning the Masters.. not sure what some of you are on..

Why not?