Like VD said, Cambodia is a cheaper, more raw (in terms of poverty and crime) version of Thailand. If you are thinking about moving there, keep in mind that in a lot of the areas the internet is VERY slow and goes down completely almost daily.
Good beaches, cheap food and drink, nice and friendly people.
Rampant poverty, noticeable levels of crime, unstable government.
Overall a good country to visit but I couldn't see myself living there for an extended period of time, at least with the way things are right now (still in the early stages of development). Thailand would be the better choice between the two.
but u sure can bet! >
If you mean moving there to bet for a living, it wouldn't be feasible in my opinion.
Not good enough banking facilities, and add the inconsistency of electricity and internet...it just wouldn't be possible at this point. Maybe 5-10 years down the road.
Like I said, Thailand would be a much better choice all around. The internet is reliable, banking is pretty solid, and there are ways around everything else.
Just the opposite in Thailand...one thing though, it is illegal to gamble in Thailand....although some sports books can be bought up on the internet..
My Ex-Partner is a local book in Phucket, as long as he doesnt get involved with the locals he doesnt have a problem with the authorities.:drink:
It would seem to me that if somebody wanted to make a decent income in a place like Pattaya, booking wouldn't be such a bad idea, as long as you can take action on soccer for the Brits and rugby for the Aussies.
Too risky for me, even though you could buy your way out of trouble most likely. :nono5:
If you mean moving there to bet for a living, it wouldn't be feasible in my opinion.
Not good enough banking facilities, and add the inconsistency of electricity and internet...it just wouldn't be possible at this point. Maybe 5-10 years down the road.
Like I said, Thailand would be a much better choice all around. The internet is reliable, banking is pretty solid, and there are ways around everything else.
Would it be fair to say that - like many other countries outside USA - an American wanting to relocate for any significant time period would be best to keep most of his assets stateside and available via normal banking transfers etc?