something to keep in mind i think
saints will look to run more vs raiders- bad rush def-build some confidence on the run and limit turnovers
raiders will look to run vs saints-bad rush def-no staking the box vs raiders is needed
think raiders and saints run well in the game and we might see a ton of clock get used up
saint mght look to get up and just play conservativein my opinion
i cant believe i am gonna say this but i kinda like the raiders and the under with a big gulp!!!!!:missingte
saints will look to run more vs raiders- bad rush def-build some confidence on the run and limit turnovers
raiders will look to run vs saints-bad rush def-no staking the box vs raiders is needed
think raiders and saints run well in the game and we might see a ton of clock get used up
saint mght look to get up and just play conservativein my opinion
i cant believe i am gonna say this but i kinda like the raiders and the under with a big gulp!!!!!:missingte
All good points you guys....both sides.
As far as the Raiders D not being bad, Denver made them look like Pop Warner kids week 1.
Then Denver goes and looks very pedestrian 2 weeks in a row vs different teams.
Add in that the Saints D isn't anything to write home about....
I see Saints scoring when they need to, a few decent drives by Oak, and a few turnovers/return game points. As good as Reggie Bush is at returning kicks on the turf, the Raiders return game might be just as good. I know they suck overall, they really do. But being from the Bay Area I do get to see their games, they have a great return game. On turf, with Bush already a factor...I see big yardage there, not to mention turnovers.
Oakland looking to amp up the offense with Kiffin gone, whether it's a good idea or not.
Good luck
