Anyone know the conference records in the tourney?

[HotRocks]

Or have a link? TIA

 

[RedElephants]

Probably not exactly what you're looking for but......

http://realtimerpi.com/rpi_conf_Men.html

 

[HotRocks]

thnx RE, yea that's not it, lol

I know PAC12 is doing bad, 1-5 last I heard but that was mid day yesterday, I've been waiting on ESPN to show it on SportsCenter but nothing yet

 

[RedElephants]

Pac-12 2-5 Utah and Oregon left

Big 12 3-4 Iowa St Kansas and Oklahoma left

Big Ten 4-3 Wisconsin, Indiana, Maryland and Iowa left

SEC 2-1 Kentucky and Texas A&M

ACC 6-1 only loss is Pitt

Big East 4-1 only loss is Seton Hall

 

[HotRocks]

sweet!!! thnx RE, hope you didn't figure that out yourself, I know its posted somewhere I just cant find it

 

[rivercitybirdie]

thanks RE and hotrocks for starting this...

so much for my "the Pac12 was chronically underrated this year" opinion

i want to do some more analysis on mediocre big conference teams vs. big upstart teams and how they've done ATS. and i don't mean against each other (unless of course they were playing each other). more just how they do as picks.

 

[rivercitybirdie]

i'll append this here.....

ATS record by seeding:

#1 3-1
#2 2-2
#3 2-2
#4 2-2
#5 1-3
#6 1-3
#7 1-3
#8 1-3

anyone see a pattern?

FYI, on the dismal 4-12 ATS recird #5's through #8's, if you filter through for ONLY power football conference teams. you just lose Dayton L, St Joe's W, seton hall L. so now you are 3-10 ATS

 

[rivercitybirdie]

big misses by seeding:

2 mcs 25 point miss
3 wv 20
4 cal 17
5 baylor 9.5
5 purdue 10
6 az 11
6 sh 13
can't read my own handwriting.... #7 dayton missed by 18 points or so...... i will check if that is correct.

 

[rivercitybirdie]

SEC only had 3 teams? Is that correct? .... I have no idea. Would have assumed more.....

SEC was/is funny.. Vanderbilt considered better than SC when V had 7 losses and SC had 1 or something similar. V had tough non-conference but they didn't win any of those games vs decent team (won 1?? Have to check)

 

[RedElephants]

SEC only had 3 teams? Is that correct? .... I have no idea. Would have assumed more.....

SEC was/is funny.. Vanderbilt considered better than SC when V had 7 losses and SC had 1 or something similar. V had tough non-conference but they didn't win any of those games vs decent team (won 1?? Have to check)

South Carolina should have made the Tournament. Period.