quack, which is a VERY fitting name for you BTW, you do realize that all long-term bettors go 17-7 at some point, right? Even when their lifetime win rate is 46%? That's one of the things that keeps the long-term losers coming back. They run good for a while and think they've finally figured it all out, at which point they give all their short-term profits (plus some) away.
I’m not saying that you’re not a winning bettor. I don’t have enough information to make that determination. I do know, however, that you’re not a 60%+ bettor. They don’t exist. If you honestly think that you’re 3-to-2 or better vs. Vegas then you’re stupid or delusional --- or both.
Being a former pro athlete and knowing a lot about sports are both fairly useless in this endeavor. Some of the most knowledgeable sports fans I know are long-term losers. And there are plenty of ex-pro athletes losing week after week after week. If just knowing a lot about sports was enough to be a long-term winner then there would be a TON of long-term winners. But there AREN’T many long-term winners, because doing so just isn’t that easy.
As I said, you might be a winning bettor. You might have found a tiny edge. But Vegas knows more about handicapping than you will if you spend every waking hour from now until you die trying to become the world’s best handicapper. If you don’t know that, then you’re ever stupider than I originally thought.
Anyway, back to your RIDICULOUS 60% claims: anyone can say it 60%+. Start posting your plays EVERY week. If we go through ONE full season and you’re at 60% in the NFL and 60+% in college football (100 play minimum --- so that you can’t go 4-for-6 and then quit) then I’ll make a public apology and I’ll send you $1000 via ******. The flip side is that, when you don’t hit 60% over that year, you acknowledge publicly that I am right --- you’re not a 60% bettor. Agreed?
-Mookie