Anyone else have the Pack?

[Illini]

Wow, I can't remember a worse bad beat. Bad spot on the 4th and inches, a fumble when the running game could not be stopped, a missed interception that would have clinched it. On top of all this, the Vikes still had to go 70 yards.....twice. And hold the Packers to a 3 and out. After kicking a chair 3 or 4 times, and punching the couch, I think I've recovered after a night of sleep. But wow, I lost a few years on my life last night.

 

[Fishhead]

That was a tough loss if you had the Packers, no doubt about it.

I watched the game with a buddy of mine at the bar who had them -4 ..........he was not happy.

 

[Illini]

I had -3.5 115, and the half point scared me. But I really felt they would dominate, and they did dominate. I didn't want to lay 145 to get 3, so I probably should have just teased it with the Pats. Pats win that game 19 out of 20 times, and that is what I should have done. Oh well, lock and load again next week.

 

[Brock Landers]

As I almost exclusevely do in cases with lines like that, I had the ML. Safest way to go..

 

[Illini]

What was the ML for the game? -2.5 on Pinnacle was like 175 or 180.

 

[Brock Landers]

Was -200 at Pinnacle.


Had that to win 2,500, almost got flushed too! Thank God for that fumble recovery..

 

[Journeyman]

ML ...wow, that takes balls....Did you have the ML on Penn State too?

 

[sherman]

Had the Pack. Changed a winning day to a losing day.

 

[Brock Landers]

Penn St? No wager on them this weekend for me.


Had the ML on Pittsburgh in NFL though, that also paid.

 

[Journeyman]

Penn St? No wager on them this weekend for me.


Had the ML on Pittsburgh in NFL though, that also paid.

Huge early season play
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->PENN ST -1 1/2

illinois St has no buisiness being given a line this small on the road vs ANYBODY, let alone a big ten team, even if its Penn St.