Any recent Tourney Trends ?

[Kaboom]

Throw them on in !!! Appreciate it !!

 

[ScottL]

Ok I'll have a few 4ya, stay tuned.

 

[ScottL]

ACC First Round 14-5 OVER run

ACC Tourney OV vs UN results (ALL Rounds) for all 6 teams playing today:
NcSt = 9-4 last 13
Clem = 6-1
BC = 8-2
Wake = 7-1
Pitt = 5-1 (but 12-18 last 30)
GTech = 4-2 (but 4-9 last 13)

 

[Enfuego]

Play-in Games
• A play-in game is expected to be competitive, with many point-spreads of 4.5 or less, however, totals have trended 16-8-1 UNDER.
• Formerly, all play-in games used to match #16 seeds, recently, play-in games featuring seeds 12 or better have trended 8-2 UNDER.
• Back to that point-spread benchmark, favorites of 4.5 or less are just 14-13 SU & 9-17-1 ATS (33.3%).
• SWAC teams are 1-8 SU & 3-6 ATS, while MAAC teams are 2-2 SU & 0-4 ATS historically in play-in games.

 

[Enfuego]

First round games
• Teams coming off a conference tournament championship are 27-11 OVER in their last 38 first round contests.
• Teams that didn’t make their conference tournament championship game are on a first round slide of just 78-95-4 ATS, good go-against teams.
• Power conference schools that lost SU & ATS in their conference championship game are 50-14 SU & 36-25-3 ATS in the first round since 2002.
• Beware of first round favorites of -1 to -3, as they are just 32-35 SU & 23-40-4 ATS since 2009.
• Only three first round favorites of 14.5 points or more out of 122 have lost outright while going 60-584 ATS.
• Top 4 seeds are just 17-25-1 ATS as double-digit first round favorites since 2013. Top 4 seeds as single digit favorites are 28-16 UNDER the total since 2006 and 26-17-1 ATS in those games.
• #5 seeds are 17-17 SU & 10-22-2 ATS in recent first round games versus #12 seeds.
• #6 seeds are 16-16 SU & 12-19-1 ATS of late in first round games versus #11 seeds. (Also 20-11-1 UNDER)
• #8 seeds are 20-12 SU & 18-13-1 ATS in their past 32 encounters versus #9 seeds (Underdogs are 1614 SU & 19-10-1 ATS in those contests).
• Power Conference schools are 12-10 SU & 6-15-1 ATS as #5 seeds in the first round since 2008.
• Power Conference schools are 9-18 SU & 13-13-1 ATS as #9-16 seeds in the first round since 2014.
Second

 

[ScottL]

Totals last year on this week OVER vs UNDER (regular rotation games):

Wed = 18-6
Thurs = 28-20
Friday = 24-10
Wed-Fri = 60 OVER, 36 UNDER
Sat = 7-11
Sat = 29-61 last 5 years!
Sunday = 2-3 / 7-12 last 3 years

 

[Salsantorre]

Rusty has lost an average of $468,000 in conference tournaments last nine years.

 

[TimmyRules]

Totals last year on this week OVER vs UNDER (regular rotation games):

Wed = 18-6
Thurs = 28-20
Friday = 24-10
Wed-Fri = 60 OVER, 36 UNDER
Sat = 7-11
Sat = 29-61 last 5 years!
Sunday = 2-3 / 7-12 last 3 years

Obviously pre Big Dance because not that many games!!
34 games today..
Thanks for info Scott

 

[tmader7]

Rusty has lost an average of $468,000 in conference tournaments last nine years.

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

On a lighter note, ALWAYS play the four 12 seeds ML against the 5 seed opening game. If memory serves me correctly, last year was a good year, the 12 seeds winning 2 of the four games.

~T~

 

[RUSS]

Sal picks whatever his mom yells down to basement lol

 

[TimmyRules]

UALR over Purdue and Yale over Baylor !!

 

[Salsantorre]

Sal picks whatever his mom yells down to basement lol

That is not remotely amusing.

 

[varkeyboy]

3pm EST start times.......


2* - 1H: Southern Miss / Rice UNDER 66
2* - 1H: UL Monroe / Arkansas St UNDER 62
2* - 1H: Stanford / Arizona St UNDER 70


Let's gooooooo!!!

 

[Loves2kickass]

Southern Mississippi/Rice OVER 142 *LARGE*

 

[tmader7]

Southern Mississippi/Rice OVER 142 *LARGE*

Damnit, Damnit, Damnit...NO,NO, NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You're supposed to say S.Miss +11+.

~T~

 

[Loves2kickass]

@)

Damnit, Damnit, Damnit...NO,NO, NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You're supposed to say S.Miss +11+.

~T~

 

[ScottL]

Obviously pre Big Dance because not that many games!!
34 games today..
Thanks for info Scott

Yes, these were trends from only last year's conf tourney major conference week.
Why are posters putting picks in here???

 

[tmader7]

Yes, these were trends from only last year's conf tourney major conference week.
Why are posters putting picks in here???

Uhhhhhh, cause the want to start a trend????

~T~

 

[Buckeyefan80]

Southern Mississippi/Rice OVER 142 *LARGE*

Didn't you put your account on the line on ATL in the SB? Why are you still posting?

 

[Kaboom]

Play-in Games • A play-in game is expected to be competitive, with many point-spreads of 4.5 or less, however, totals have trended 16-8-1 UNDER. • Formerly, all play-in games used to match #16 seeds, recently, play-in games featuring seeds 12 or better have trended 8-2 UNDER. • Back to that point-spread benchmark, favorites of 4.5 or less are just 14-13 SU & 9-17-1 ATS (33.3%). • SWAC teams are 1-8 SU & 3-6 ATS, while MAAC teams are 2-2 SU & 0-4 ATS historically in play-in games.

Solid bro !! Thanks !!!