Another Stupid Slogan: 'No Child Left Behind'

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
by Adam Caruba, writing at TGR


What a difference two days can make. On October 2, on page 36, sharing that day´s obituaries, the Star-Ledger ran John Mooney´s article, "Many Jersey schools in danger of failing" and, on October 4, it was the lead story on page one, "NJ issues high school warnings." The same day, The New York Times regional edition reported "To New Jersey Officials´ Scoffs, Most State High Schools Appear on US Warning List." By October 8, Mooney was reporting those in charge of urban schools thought the whole system by which they were being judged was manifestly unfair, if not just plain stupid.

In rare harmony, just about everyone agreed that the educational legislation passed by the Bush administration at an estimated cost of $49 billion dollars is idiotic. That was back in the days when Sen. Teddy Kennedy and President Bush were bear-hugging one another. I warned then that the Apocalypse could not be far off when these two got together to "fix" the nation´s appalling failed educational system.

Here´s why. Like everything else in life, one-size-fits-all just doesn´t work when applied to schools. New Jersey has been told that 75% of its high schools are "failing." More than 80% of Florida´s schools have been deemed as "needing improvement" and more than half of California´s. This determination was made on forty different factors set forth in the federal education legislation. Forty! Can you imagine the number of administrators a school has to hire just to keep track of forty different, federally mandated factors?

The reality is that most of the New Jersey schools designated as needing a "warning" from the Department of Education gained that dubious distinction by virtue of its "special education" students, those with dyslexia and other learning disorders or who have limited English language skills. These are students require school districts to deploy significant portions of their budgets to address their problems.

"Many educators say that the standards are too harsh and rigid, and offer unrealistically brief time periods for schools to show improvement in problem areas," the Times reporter noted. Edithe Fulton, president of the New Jersey Education Association said, "By taking a snapshot of a single day, this law fails to recognize and applaud the good work going on in our public schools, and gives citizens a false picture of our entire system of public education." True, but the public already knows that the entire US public school system is failing from coast to coast.

Throwing billions of dollars at that failing system, while imposing one-size-fits-all federal standards, is not just idiotic, it is wasteful to the tune of impoverishing every suburb and city in the nation.

Lewis Andrews, writing in a recent issue of The American Enterprise, notes that "With a significant number of states in serious budget trouble, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has estimated state deficits for fiscal year 2004 at up to $85 billion." The vast bulk of that figure can be traced to the amount of money the Education Mafia is sucking out of the pockets of taxpayers. "In 2002, the latest year for which data are available, property taxes rose an average of 10 percent nationally."

Local, public schools are impoverishing the communities they supposedly are serving. The reasons are many, but high on the list are the teacher´s union demands and schools in which there are often as many, if not more, administrators than teachers.

Meanwhile, in towns and cities across America, parents are demanding a voucher system that allows them to move their children from schools that are failing to schools that are not. As often as not, that means private schools.

"According to the National Center for Education Statistics," wrote Andrews, "per pupil spending in religious and independent schools average $4,600 versus $6,857 in public schools." You do the math. As Andrews points out, "there may be more than $100 billion in unnecessary spending for public schools. Reduce that, and the state and local budget deficits evaporate. There would be no budget crisis were public schools operating with the same efficiency as private schools." And students would benefit from a higher quality of teaching and learning.

For example, Andrews notes "Fully 40 percent of per pupil spending in California goes to bureaucracy. Nationwide, public schools spend more than twice what other industrialized countries spend on administrators." In California, millions of children of illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico, get a free pass in their schools plus the dubious benefit of bilingual education when, at the very least, they should be learning English.

Andrews concludes that "Helping more parents obtain private education for their children could not only improve US schooling, but also save large amounts of taxpayer money." And the kicker is that graduates of private schools, at all tuition levels, score consistently higher on objective achievement tests and go on to college in significantly higher numbers. This is especially true of all home-school students!

There´s an additional bonus in helping parents fund the transfer of their children from failing public schools to successful private ones. Their students are spared the political correctness of public schools whose curriculum is filled with contempt for American values and history, and are filled with teachers who simply are not qualified to be in the classroom.

Instead of graduating with high self-esteem and an ignorance of writing, reading, arithmetic, history, geography, civics, and other topics, students would receive the education they should be getting in public schools. Nor would an estimated seven to eight million students be required to take mind-altering drugs such as Ritalin after being "diagnosed" as over-active or inattentive.

At some point, presumably, taxpayers will conclude that billions of their hard-earned dollars are being flushed down the toilet by the control the federal government now exercises over state and local school systems. Until then, your property taxes are going to continue to increase while millions more students graduate from failed public schools.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,765
Tokens
In Arizona we had the AIMS tests to make sure the schoolkids were learning enough so that "no child should be left behind". When too many kids failed the tests the tests themselves were attacked by educators as being flawed.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Six grand a year

25 kids in the class = $150,000.00

Teacher gets about a fourth of that. Lot a waste waste there I think.

I can see why the private sector could do a way better job spending our money.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
USA #1 in spending in the world on public Education about 10th in the world in product.

State of Georgia before this last election all democrat state goverment for years before this last election....50th in the country on education..(product)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,765
Tokens
Pat:

Good point. Throwing money at education rarely results in better education if the system is broken to begin with.

Some people say "Let's all spend more for our children on education. We owe it to them. They are our future." I say "that doesn't work."
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Your not first, you're 47th.(to 1999)
In total $$'s you're probaly first, but once its split amongst so many people its diluted.

http://www.nationmaster.com/red/graph-T/edu_edu_spe

Americas public programs have a worldwide reputation for being underfunded and sub-standard, no surprise there.
The UK is catching up with you fast too.

We'll soon have a sub-standard public health and education system just like you guys.
Aah. The joys of a private sector system.

[This message was edited by eek on October 17, 2003 at 07:26 PM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
posted by eek:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
Aah. The joys of a private sector system.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

There's nothing "private sector" about the American educational system, and precious little about our healthcare system. If either were truly managed by the private sector they'd work.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
One thing about liberals is that they are for prochoice except on education and living fetus prospect of prochoice.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Your public/government military programs on the other hand, are second to no-one.
Mountains of cash, the jewel in your crown.
Bigger and better than anyone has ever done before.

Public education and health just isn't important enough to warrant the investment to make you a world leader, thats all.

[This message was edited by eek on October 18, 2003 at 05:48 AM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
eek

Actually, our Socialist programs have always received more funding than our military.

FY 2000 expenditures on Medicare and Medicaid alone were $ 342 billion, versus "only" $ 288 billion on military (which even at that rate provided us with the werewithal to fight an average of one foreign war per year, yet still failed to enable us to shoot down four unarmed passenger planes. Go figure.)

That same year, we spent:

$ 19 billion subsidising farmers

$ 6 billion interfering in commerce

$ 34 billion on education

$ 17 billion making the energy industry an unworkable Socialised fiasco

$ 54 billion on "health and human services" (FDA and other mystery agencies which seem to do nothing but ill)

$ 37 billion on destroying our cities and enabling a generation of leeches via HUD

$ 12 billion interfering in labour

$ 48 billion managing highways that most of us do not use

$ 7 billion protecting the environment at the expense of everyone else

A staggering $ 11 billion on foreign aid

We spent another $ 173 billion on federal welfare that did not fall into the category of Medicaid/Medicare, education, or HUD.

Finally, that true "jewel in the crown" known as Social Security milked the American people of $ 438 billion in FY 2000. The related Federal Pension Fund scheme sucked another $ 80 billion from our pockets.

Leaving out those which are not clear examples of Socialism, and focusing only on those that are (Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, HUD, Education, Labour, and the suspicious "Miscellaneous" welfare budget) that's $ 1.036 trillion, or nearly 50% of our entire $ 2.1 trillion federal budget, spent on social betterment bullshit.

Bear in mind that that doesn't include programs run by other agencies that do not make it into the 'official' welfare budget. Additionally, that does not include money spent by the various state, county and municipal agencies on same. And finally, there is simply no way to measure the overall added "expenditures" which are manifested in increased costs across the board to those of us who are not on the dole.

So ... seems that the "investment" [sic] is being made after all, and at levels which make outed Socialist nations like Sweden and Denmark look like dilettantes.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
11
Tokens
Yet the same criminals responsible for this disaster of spending are sent back to Congress year after year. Unfortunately, it has gotten to the point that there are too many VOTERS lapping at the trough. Eventually, and of this I have no doubt, the scenario will play out much like in "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand. The Jon Galts among us will say enough is enough and simply disappear leaving only the bueaurcrats and those dependent on them with no one to foot the bill...
 

mws

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,124
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> State of Georgia before this last election all democrat state goverment for years before this last election....50th in the country on education..(product) <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
When I was in high school in South Carolina, South Carolina was last in per-capita spending on public schools, and my school district was 93rd of 94 in the state in terms of spending. But an extremely high percentage of the graduates went on to get college degrees. Why? Intelligence is for the most part genetically determined, and a large portion of my classmates were children of college professors. Money can't fix what is wrong with oour schools because the cause of bad schools is ... bad students.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,513
Members
100,875
Latest member
edukatex
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com