Another "disorderly conduct" arrest when man insults D.C. police

Search

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Should be interesting to see how this plays out and how that resolution will precede other future cases of alleged "disorderly conduct".

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/29/disorderly-conduct-conver_n_246794.html<!-- Entry -->

Disorderly Conduct: Conversation About Gates Arrest Precedes Arrest


A lawyer who moments earlier had been complaining to friends about police overreaction in the arrest of Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr., got a taste of the Gates treatment himself after loudly chanting "I hate the police" near a traffic stop in Northwest Washington, D.C.


Pepin Tuma, 33, was walking with two friends along Washington's hip U Street corridor around midnight Saturday, complaining about how Gates had been rousted from his home for not showing a proper amount of deference to a cop. "We'd been talking about it all day," said Tuma. "It seems like police have a tendency to act overly aggressively when they're being pushed around," Tuma recalled saying.


Then the group noticed five or six police cruisers surrounding two cars in an apparent traffic stop on the other side of the street. It seemed to Tuma that was more cops than necessary.


"That's why I hate the police," Tuma said. He told the Huffington Post that in a loud sing-song voice, he then chanted, "I hate the police, I hate the police."


One officer reacted strongly to Tuma's song. "Hey! Hey! Who do you think you're talking to?" Tuma recalled the officer shouting as he strode across an intersection to where Tuma was standing. "Who do you think you are to think you can talk to a police officer like that?" the police officer said, according to Luke Platzer, 30, one of Tuma's companions.


Tuma said he responded, "It is not illegal to say I hate the police. It's not illegal to express my opinion walking down the street."


According to Tuma and Platzer, the officer pushed Tuma against an electric utility box, continuing to ask who he thought he was and to say he couldn't talk to police like that.


"I didn't curse," Tuma said. "I asked, am I being arrested? Why am I being arrested?"



Within minutes, the officer had cuffed Tuma. The charge: disorderly conduct -- just like Gates, who was arrested after police responded to a report of a possible break-in at his home and Gates protested their ensuing behavior.
D.C.'s disorderly conduct statute bars citizens from breaching the peace by doing anything "in such a manner as to annoy, disturb, interfere with, obstruct, or be offensive to others" or by shouting or making noise "either outside or inside a building during the nighttime to the annoyance or disturbance of any considerable number of persons."


The local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has said that the city's disorderly conduct law is "confusing, overbroad, frequently used by police to harass disfavored individuals" and that it "violates constitutional rights of free speech, assembly and petition."


Tuma spent a few hours in a holding cell and was released early Sunday morning after forfeiting $35 in collateral to the police, he said. A "post and forfeit" is not an admission of guilt, and Tuma doesn't have a court date -- but the arrest will pop up if an employer does a background check.


Tuma filed a complaint with the D.C. Office of Police Complaints, alleging a lack of probable cause, a false arrest, and that the officer used harassing and demeaning language -- Tuma alleges the officer called him a "faggot." Tuma has retained a lawyer. He might sue if he's not satisfied after a meeting with the complaint office on Thursday.


"I have an actionable claim," he said.


The Huffington Post obtained a copy of the collateral/bond receipt that lists the charge, but the D.C. Police Department declined to comment and the arresting officer did not answer or return calls to the station.


While the Gates incident has largely been treated as a story about race, many have noted, from the Los Angeles Times to Christopher Hitchens to Maureen Dowd, that the incident said as much about police use of disorderly conduct laws. Tuma agrees.

"People talk about the Gates thing in terms of race, but it's an ongoing problem of police using disorderly conduct to shut people up," Tuma said.
 

no stripes on my shirt but i can make her pu**y wh
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
4,571
Tokens
BFD barman. once my (white) friend pissed on a squad car in huntington beach and while he was being arrested my other (white) friend told one of the cops that he was an asshole. he was arrested also. it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with temperments of cops, just like the article says.
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
BFD barman. once my (white) friend pissed on a squad car in huntington beach and while he was being arrested my other (white) friend told one of the cops that he was an asshole. he was arrested also. it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with temperments of cops, just like the article says.

or the temperment of fools.

the article above stated the guy who got arrested was a lawyer. late at night while the cops have two cars pulled over for God knows what, he's going to start chanting "i hate the police" simply because he thought there were too many cops on the scene? sounds like a lawyer in desperate need of making a name for himself.

now, i'm assuming you think it's okay to walk down the street and chant "i hate the police" while they are in the middle of doing their job. you're enjoying your freedom of speech, right? you should be able to say what you want, when you want, and where you want.

so now you're walking down the street (this is my scenario). let's say you see a group of black guys standing around and you start chanting "i hate --" now, these black guys come over and beat your ass. the next day you file a lawsuit, claiming that your freedom of speech was trampled along with your face. should you win the lawsuit? what if there were two cops standing close by who heard you making your racial comments and did nothing, and then continued to stand by while you got your ass kicked?

i'm assuming barman has more knowledge of the laws than myself, but if the cops were in the process of having 2 cars pulled over (and the article never said what for, it could've been a routine stop or two violent criminals who could snap any second), and this idiot wants to start chanting "i hate the police", then i could see where disorderly conduct could be charged, considering that that idiocy could have led to a deadly distraction.

i guess the question comes down to, should we be allowed to flip off the cop, call the cop a pig, and say "fuck the police" when we walk into a doughnut shop? i have never had a run in with a law enforcement officer that i felt was unjust, so i must admit that i'm biased. but i'm not trying to tell the county sheriff to suck my cock when i go to renew my tags either.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
BFD barman. once my (white) friend pissed on a squad car in huntington beach and while he was being arrested my other (white) friend told one of the cops that he was an asshole. he was arrested also. it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with temperments of cops, just like the article says.

I concur that attitudes on race had nothing to do with the arrest in D.C.

What's of interest to me is how it proceeds with regards to police using Disorderly Conduct statutes as a weapon against citizens who are simply exercising their First Amendment rights.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
I would say the guy in DC is on shaky ground.

After all the cops were in the process of making an arrest.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,542
Tokens
I didn't read the article but I certainly believe it's a race issue


sound familiar? :103631605
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Nonsense. He was standing across the street, so there's no reasonable case he was interfering with anything they were doing.

But regardless of how this one plays out, I forecast we're going to be seeing an increase in the number of people who with premeditation publicly berate police in order to challenge their use of D.O. statutes as a means to inhibit free speech.

With the increased ease of getting video accounts of such encounters, the police have lost their long-held advantage of making an arrest using dubious charge(s) and then fabricating evidence in their reports to make the arrest appear more legitimate.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,542
Tokens
But regardless of how this one plays out, I forecast we're going to be seeing an increase in the number of people who with premeditation publicly berate police in order to challenge their use of D.O. statutes as a means to inhibit free speech.

sounds like we're in for an increase in "don't taze me bro" videos.
@)
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,130
Tokens
and the moral of the story is?

don't act like a fucking losing asshole, lest you might get arrested for something

sings loudly "I hate police, I hate police" because it appears to him that the cops overacted to some situation he knew nothing about. and that's his verson

:laugh:

there is one big difference between the idiot professor and this loser, the officers were not called to the scene to protect this loser's property or person.

of course, if the idiot professor simply provided ID and / or the retard in chief didn't seek this situation out to make himself look like a buffoon, we wouldn't be having this conversation about this loser.

One thing for sure, you lefties keep some weird bed fellows. :ohno:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
and the moral of the story is?

don't act like a fucking losing asshole, lest you might get arrested for something

sings loudly "I hate police, I hate police" because it appears to him that the cops overacted to some situation he knew nothing about. and that's his verson

:laugh:

there is one big difference between the idiot professor and this loser, the officers were not called to the scene to protect this loser's property or person.

of course, if the idiot professor simply provided ID and / or the retard in chief didn't seek this situation out to make himself look like a buffoon, we wouldn't be having this conversation about this loser.

One thing for sure, you lefties keep some weird bed fellows. :ohno:

I got the impression the guy was rwn.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,830
Messages
13,573,737
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com