Another Big One Tonight: Colorado Avalanche -1.5 (+210)

[akphidelt]

Alright, Canucks on a back to back and 3 games in 4 nights. Dallas exposed them with their speed and playing in high altitude Colorado, against just as fast of a team. Avs have too stacked of a lineup to continue struggling like they have. Think they explode this game and take it 6-2.

10.24 Avs -1.5 (+210) $200 to win $420

GL!

 

[he_dblhockeystx]

fuckin a right !

 

[Feddz]

GL tonight AK! Not sure I'd ever feel good riding the PL with the Avs, but the Canucks have only 1 impressive win so far this year, and are on a B2B and 3in4 so you're not likely to get a better chance either!

 

[scottcarter]

good luck you liberal bastard :missingte

I like it.

 

[powerz]

Canucks rolled 4 lines last nite the Sedins avg'd 14 mins.
Eddie Lack in goal
Colorado still finding their way -



gl with the play

 

[akphidelt]

Thanks guys! Gl whatever you play! Almost game time. I'm not gonna lie the Canadian national anthem is catchy! When Winnipeg had the crowd sing it, it gave you goose bumps.

 

[akphidelt]

Well that's not a good start, lol. 10 sec in.

 

[Rayriceyourwife]

Power play!! Let's get that bs goal back!

 

[akphidelt]

After the first 3 min, the Avs are pouring it on. Need one to get through on this pp.

 

[akphidelt]

Goal Iginla!! What a fucking shot! 1-1

 

[akphidelt]

That's such fucking bullshit. He kicked the puck in and the ref made the call.

 

[scottcarter]

That's such fucking bullshit. He kicked the puck in and the ref made the call.

it was the right call actually. I am sure he hit it with his stick because the puck picked up speed after we lost it in the pads

 

[Rayriceyourwife]

Was not the right call. Ref called it no goal went to review and said call stands. Goal! Wtf

 

[akphidelt]

it was the right call actually. I am sure he hit it with his stick because the puck picked up speed after we lost it in the pads

There was not a single angle showing it hit his stick

 

[scottcarter]

Was not the right call. Ref called it no goal went to review and said call stands. Goal! Wtf

they talked about it (the refs did) and they said it was a good goal before it went to Toronto for review. Not enough to overturn it.

 

[scottcarter]

There was not a single angle showing it hit his stick

like I said, and the play by play play said, the puck definitely picked up speed once we lost sight of it. Only explaination for that is he hit it with his stick. Colorado is going to win this game I think.

 

[akphidelt]

they talked about it (the refs did) and they said it was a good goal before it went to Toronto for review. Not enough to overturn it.

Yea, the ref closest to the play was demonstrative in saying it was no goal. He had his mind changed but the call would have went either way depending on what ref got his way. That's what the Colorado coach was complaining about.

 

[akphidelt]

If I was on Vancouver I would believe his stick hit it also and they got it right, lol.

 

[scottcarter]

If I was on Vancouver I would believe his stick hit it also and they got it right, lol.

lol but I am not on Vancouver tonight. http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1001874&highlight=

just being honest as to how I saw it.

 

[akphidelt]

lol but I am not on Vancouver tonight. http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1001874&highlight=

just being honest as to how I saw it.

I didn't think you were on Vancouver, just was being honest myself. I can see both sides of the argument, however I wish it was a no goal like the ref said.