Amazing. The Liar finally admitted the 47 million uninsured Americans claim was incorrect....

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
....ahhhhhh. I feel vindicated.

Now if we can also admit that another 9 to 17 million can actually afford to purchase health care but choose not to buy it, and then we'll have the real number. See, it's not so hard to tell the truth.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
641
Tokens
Here’s something that’s flying under the radar, states enacting single payer health care at state level. Single payer is the most cost effective system for health care.

“The New York State Assembly last year passed a similar resolution in support of HR 676 sponsored by Assemblymembers Ortiz and Gottfried. New York is the second state after Maine to have both houses of the State legislature pass a resolution in favor of a federal single payer health care program. Several other states have had at least one state legislative chamber pass such a resolution. The California state legislature has twice passed bills to create a state single payer system only to have it vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.” Google single payer at the state level, or single payer cost studies.

BTW, California’s AG Jerry Brown is running for Gov. in 2010 and is ahead in polls, he supports single payer and will sign the bill if it hits his desk. Once single payer finds a home in one state it will spread like wildfire. This is how Canada’s system got started not at the federal level. So support your state’s right to have single payer universal health care, HR 676 medicare for all.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
641
Tokens
....ahhhhhh. I feel vindicated.

Now if we can also admit that another 9 to 17 million can actually afford to purchase health care but choose not to buy it, and then we'll have the real number. See, it's not so hard to tell the truth.

How is this going to help the economy? Other nations that have universal health can under sell US products and have a healthier work force.

Countries looking to relocate plants if they have a choice of a universal care country or the US will choose universal care because of the cost savings.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
Just because people can afford something doesn't mean it is a good product

Most people could afford to have their taxes doubled or salaries cut in half and still be able to pay for food and shelter. Doesn't mean it would serve the country well

Most people could afford a near lifetime of medical treatment if rates weren't based around insurance companies demands. You Liberals love to kill the free market
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
Just because people can afford something doesn't mean it is a good product

Most people could afford to have their taxes doubled or salaries cut in half and still be able to pay for food and shelter. Doesn't mean it would serve the country well

Most people could afford a near lifetime of medical treatment if rates weren't based around insurance companies demands. You Liberals love to kill the free market

Which has absolutely nothing to do with my post
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens

<TABLE id=post6965553 class=tborder border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 0px solid" id=currentPost class=thead>
post_old.gif
09-08-2009, 10:21 AM <!-- / status icon and date --></TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid" class=thead align=right> #5 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid" class=alt2 width=175>Pat Patriot<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_6965553", true); </SCRIPT>
RX SemiGod



Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Peoples Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 13,232


</TD><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid" id=td_post_6965553 class=alt1><!-- icon and title -->
icon1.gif

<HR style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fdde82; COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->Why goverment takeover?Why not insurance reform like letting people by insurance over state lines? Why not tort reform?
Why potentially ruin what people are happy with by a complete change over to cover 30 million people? (the left says 50 mil. the right says 15 mil.)
How are you going tax small buis. another 8% and expect to create jobs?
How are you going to cut 500 billion bucks from medicare over the next ten years when there are going to be 30% more people on medicare in the next ten years?
<!-- / message --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

The Manchurian Teleprompter actually said 30 million like I did the day before the speech.I was splitting the diff between right and left.
He was leaving off crimigrants,leaving them uncovered before he left them covered, in a John Kerry sort of way.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,826
Messages
13,573,594
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com