All Things, Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman

Search

Active member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
58,412
Tokens
Let's see. The only racist testimony thusfar points squarely at Trayvon Martin. You conveniently make up unsubstantiated shit about GZ being a racist when his past history points to him being an all inclusive guy. But the one piece of testimony pointing to racism comes from none other than Trayvon's girlfriend on the stand. She said that Trayvon told her that he was "being followed by a creepy fuckin' cracker." You are a race hustler, Vit. And a clueless one at that.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Let's see. The only racist testimony thusfar points squarely at Trayvon Martin. You conveniently make up unsubstantiated shit about GZ being a racist when his past history points to him being an all inclusive guy. But the one piece of testimony pointing to racism comes from none other than Trayvon's girlfriend on the stand. She said that Trayvon told her that he was "being followed by a creepy fuckin' cracker." You are a race hustler, Vit. And a clueless one at that.


I didnt make up anything. He followed Martin because he was black. It is clear as day. Just because you guys get all bent out of shape when race is mentioned, doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

Past history says he's inclusive? lol. Thats almost like the " I cant be racist i have black friends" excuse. I dont know if he's a racist or not.....him following Martin was clearly based on race. If it was a white guy wearing a tie....Zimmerman stays put.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
I just stopped reading after line one. The evidence points to GZ's statements being 100% accurate.

1) TM had zero injuries.
2) GZ had injuries.
3) TM had marks on his hand.
4) GZ had no marks on his hands.
5) An eyewitness testified he saw TM on top of GZ pounding him.

You're right, nobody saw this thing start but the evidence points to one thing.

Oh by the way...TM said to GZ "well, you have a problem now."

Really, what do you think happened?
What about the eye witnesses that said they saw Zimmerman on top of Martin? Doesn't that raise some doubt as to what actually happened? Or are you only believing the witnesses who say what you want to hear?
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
What eyewitness said they saw Zimmerman on top of Martin? Name please.

As I said earlier, I have not been following the trial day by day like some(I have a life with better things to do)but I have read some reports about it. Here is the article I read, and its from FOX so it must be correct, right? If you read the very last paragragh it states that some witnesses have said they saw Zimmerman on top but it does not give their names. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/04/prosecutors-winding-down-case-in-george-zimmerman-trial/
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
I didnt make up anything. He followed Martin because he was black. It is clear as day. Just because you guys get all bent out of shape when race is mentioned, doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

Past history says he's inclusive? lol. Thats almost like the " I cant be racist i have black friends" excuse. I dont know if he's a racist or not.....him following Martin was clearly based on race. If it was a white guy wearing a tie....Zimmerman stays put.

There isn't one shred of evidence to prove this.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
No, that doesnt make him guilty. Following him, confronting him for no reason and shooting him does.

Once again you leave out the part where the physical altercation occurred. You've left it out for three pages now.

You seem to see it as GZ followed him, confronted him and then pulled out a gun and shot him conveniently leaving out what happened after the confrontation. Until you can admit something else happened and until you can admit GZ may have been acting in self defense, we are at a stalemate.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
What about the eye witnesses that said they saw Zimmerman on top of Martin? Doesn't that raise some doubt as to what actually happened? Or are you only believing the witnesses who say what you want to hear?

Anytime you want to include names and testimony from court saying GZ was on top, I'm open to listen.

You haven't done this yet.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
This is so simple it's hard.

Those in TM's camp think GZ followed him, confronted him, pulled out a gun and shot him. They make no mention of a physical beat down.

Those in GZ's camp think GZ followed him, TM confronted GZ, attacked him and was shot and killed by GZ.

It's really that simple.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
GZ carried a gun and because he did, he was a coward and pussy meaning he deserved to get beat up that night.

That's it. Conviction for GZ.

What a joke.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
Anytime you want to include names and testimony from court saying GZ was on top, I'm open to listen.

You haven't done this yet.

Like I said, I don't have the time to watch the trial and get names and whatever. But I did post a thread above that states there are some witnesses who said they thought it was Zimmerman on top. I am not saying he was, just that some witnesses say they think he was, which does raise some doubt as to what actually happened.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Once again you leave out the part where the physical altercation occurred. You've left it out for three pages now.

You seem to see it as GZ followed him, confronted him and then pulled out a gun and shot him conveniently leaving out what happened after the confrontation. Until you can admit something else happened and until you can admit GZ may have been acting in self defense, we are at a stalemate.

Oh boy. I have already stated this. He followed Martin on foot, then in a car....confronted Martin and then a fight happened in which Zimmerman was losing. Martin did what many of us would have done. Did you ever think Martin thought he was in danger from some guy following him around? A fight occured yes....we all know this....im not sure what you keep seeing i left out.

So everytime a fist fight occurs you are justified in shooting someone? Medical expertts have already testified the injuries to GZ were very minor.
 

cunning linguist, master debator
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
2,426
Tokens
he had a broken nose and multiple lacerations TO THE BACK OF HIS HEAD...which indicates that he was on bottom (like Vit's boyfriend) most if not all of the time!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
he had a broken nose and multiple lacerations TO THE BACK OF HIS HEAD...which indicates that he was on bottom (like Vit's boyfriend) most if not all of the time!


Poor GZ...typical right wing gun owner....acts like a tough guy...gets punched and reaches for his gun.


You shouldnt be talking about relationships....you are the one thats girlfriend was banging some other dude. No shock there though.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
There isn't one shred of evidence to prove this.

It is a very easy conclusion to make. GZ would never admit that so there wont be "evidence" of it.....but use your brain a little. If it was a white guy....Zimmerman doesnt follow.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
hes gonna be aquitted....get over it


Over what? I don't care if he walks or not. Isnt gonna be the only murderer walking the streets.

That girl of yours must have been some foul, disease ridden fatty....and you couldnt even keep her.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,134,974
Messages
13,821,823
Members
104,169
Latest member
scamproof
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com