| NCAAF - 12/21/2016 | Spread | ML | O/U | ||||||
| 12/21 9:00 PM 217 BYU 218 Wyoming  | 43% 57% | 41% 59% | 79% 21% |
57% of bets on Wyoming, yet the line goes from -8 to -10.
79% on the Over, the line drops from 59 to 57.
Doesn't seem like "all the money is on Wyoming" at all.
BYU and the UNDER seem like the play.
I don't think Wyoming scores much at all, BYU defense been pretty stingy all season.
I wouldn't say ALL the $ is on Wyoming as SI currently shows only 56% on the Cowboys, buy yeah when there is RLM with the majority backing the dog then that's usually a pretty good indication to use caution. I think the line opened a bit low and this is a market correction, as the number I made was Mormon -12.5. I'd like to take the dog here but don't think I can do it for the reasons stated, plus the fact that their home\road results seem rather extreme. The 66-69 loss @ UNLV is rather disturbing and they did not look that great on the road against a bad Nevada team as well. Looks like they were fortunate catching most of their tougher conference foes at home in the thin air of Laramie. They did have a nice win on the road at Colo State, but I think the Rams were kinda struggling at that point in the season. Looks like line up to -10.5 as I type this.
I see these same posts on every forum today. Moneys on wyoming , yet line has moved up. Why on earth do so many of you bettors believe all those bogus consensus websites {which am sure are owned by sports books}
These websites were all created to mess with your minds and get bettors to become lazy and stop handicapping games. Listen ask yourself this question " if you owned a sports book would you release out any type of info that very well could help bettors win your money? You would have to be friggin insane to do it.
Stop believing those bogus consensus sites, because in the end you will end up at about 50 percent if your lucky.
Only way you will ever get real sports book info is if you know somebody working in a sports book, other wise all that info you see is nothing but made up bullshitttttt
These websites were all created to mess with your minds and get bettors to become lazy and stop handicapping games. Listen ask yourself this question " if you owned a sports book would you release out any type of info that very well could help bettors win your money? You would have to be friggin insane to do it.
Stop believing those bogus consensus sites, because in the end you will end up at about 50 percent if your lucky.
Only way you will ever get real sports book info is if you know somebody working in a sports book, other wise all that info you see is nothing but made up bullshitttttt
Not the expert smart ass, just been doing this shit for 35 years and i live in the real world where i am smart enough to know that no sports book is going to help me win their money. Seriously you have to be an outright fool to believe that. I guess if you owned a sports book, you would give bettors all your info, so that they could win your money lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.
Heres another reason why these consensus sites mean jack shit. Every single day on every single game wagered in every sport played, there will be sharp bettors on both sides of all the games. Like tonights game, sports insights numbers suggest the smart money is playing byu. You really think there is no smart bettors playing wyoming? So really the info is useless.
You think guys like billy walters is checking sports insights to see what bettors are supposedly on? No friggin way, the guy makes his own numbers and plays what they say. Thats the way you cap games. You should be able to make your own numbers everyday and dont give a crap what side anybody else is on.
But hey what do i know, am sure you are living in a mansion, driving a rolls off your winnings from using sports insights numbers.
