A vote for OBAMA is a vote for OSAMA

Search

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
A vote for OBAMA is a vote for OSAMA .... Has a nice gingle to it huh? Now that I have your attention, please read this...


There is a Job to finish in Bagdad
Last week a 14 year old suicide bombers was apprehended by two Iraqi security guards as he made his way to the Rasoul mosque, which was filed with Shite worshipers celebrating the end of Ramadan. The boy detonated himself as he struggled with guards, who were killed instantly. as were several passersby.

The attack was one of two that day against Shite targets, which the New York Times duly reported under the headline "Bagdad Suicide Bombers Kill 2 Dozen in Attacks on Mosques," The Rimes added that " many in the crowd immediatley said they suspected American Involvement," although it added that "they displayed no obvious signs of hostility to a group of American soldiers who remained at the scene for some time."

Taken at face value, the story suggests just how "fragile and reversible", things are in Iraq, to use what has now become stock line. Not reported by the Times, however- or anywhere else in the Western Media, as far as I can tell - was the identiy of the guards who prevented what could have been a much deadlier attack. One of them, Hamid Mansour Hassoun, was a Sunni. The other, Mohammad Nouri al-Rubaie, was a Shite. Their joint sacrafice is a testament to everything much of the world thought Iraq could never be.

The media also "suggested" Maliki wanted the government out of Iraq by 2010, but he never said that. More liberal hype from the NYT, Wash Post and other domestic toilet paper newspapers. Those fear and hate mongering newspapers are anti-american.
:pucking:
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
The job to finish in Iraq is to get the fuck out. Unfortunately, Obama isn't serious about getting all the troops out.


You are right... Obama never said there was an immediate withdrawl. His supporters suport him because they believe there will be, but Obama wants to set a 16mo to 18 mo timetable...

He always wants to INCREASE the troop levels in Afgan for a net gain of NOTHING. If you are an anti-war person OBAMA IS NOT YOUR GUY. I repeat, if you are a pacifist, OBAMA IS NOT YOUR GUY. Obama's plans look very similar to Mccains plans.

The only candidate that want'ed an immediate withdrawl was RON PAUL and the lefty media didn't even give him the time of day despite winning more votes than Rudy Guliani and Joe Biden in Primaries.
 

L5Y, USC is 4-0 vs SEC, outscoring them 167-48!!!
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,025
Tokens
hahahahah did you get that quote from one of those overweight fat chicks in line at the Palin rallies?
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
7,373
Tokens
Obama's plans look very similar to Mccains plans.

That is because it is not either of their plans. They are just following the same script.
It's not for nothing that Zbigniew Brzezinski was a key foreign policy advisor to Mccain in 2000 and is a key foreign policy advisor to Obama now.
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
That is because it is not either of their plans. They are just following the same script.
It's not for nothing that Zbigniew Brzezinski was a key foreign policy advisor to Mccain in 2000 and is a key foreign policy advisor to Obama now.


Honestly, I know the Obama faithful will be pissed off by the headline, but can you please elaborate on how different Obama's plan is to Mccain?


Obama
16-18 month timetable... scaling back etc.
adding troops to Afgan...
He would basically be turning Afganistan into his Iraq

Mccain
No timetable, withdrawl based on results ( still could be 16-18mos)
adding troops to Afgan
Both guys have most of the new fighting in Afgan


Mccain does seem more commited to the fighting. He personally knows other foreign leaders and how the game is played... Obama seems more of a lightweight and will probably delegate a lot to others...

but it's not like Obama is sending the troops home tomorrow, and Mccain is keeping them there the next 100 years or anything ( like Obama wants you to believe).

I just wonder if there would be all these "peace rallies" if Obama gets in. Will those same pacifists be as disguisted in Obama as Bush or if Mccain would have won.

What about all the "lame duck deaths" that would happen 16-18 months after the Obama inaguration? Those people would die for nothing?
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
7,373
Tokens
Mccain is keeping them there the next 100 years or anything ( like Obama wants you to believe).

Not sure about 100...but 55 years after the fighting ended in Korea we are still in Korea and even longer in Germany despite being allied with their government.
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Obama has good intentions. McCain is way off the farm. It's somewhere in the middle.

End of controversy. We're there for good, and 10 years minimum in an occupational mode (75,000+ troops)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
7,373
Tokens
We're there for good, and 10 years minimum in an occupational mode (75,000+ troops)

Hahaha. Doesn't that make you sick? Do you agree with that policy? And how is that policy different than Mccain's policy would be?
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
Hahaha. Doesn't that make you sick? Do you agree with that policy? And how is that policy different than Mccain's policy would be?


Exactly. Obama supporters don't think. In the obama supporters world...

Mccain is for war
Obama is for peace
Mccain is for the rich
Obama is for the poor
Mccain is for oil
Obama is for the enviornment


They don't even look at the policies. They just blindly follow an empty suit and "hope and change". Obama had pretty much the exact same policies as hillary too.

Neither Mccain or Obama are going to end violence anytime soon. I wonder if the pinko liberals that protest all the fighting and wear scream masks and all black and march are going to do that if Obama is in office.

Those idiots will still probably be protesting bush. :missingte
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
Obama has good intentions. McCain is way off the farm. It's somewhere in the middle.

End of controversy. We're there for good, and 10 years minimum in an occupational mode (75,000+ troops)


Typical Obama supporter, unable to think for himself. He can't pick side A or side B, he has to take the middle ground and pick a little of A and a little of B. He will wait until the "experts" tell him what to do, think, where his money should go, what kind of car he should drive, and where his kids should go to school.

Freedom doesn't even exist to him.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
641
Tokens
The job to finish in Iraq is to get the fuck out quickly.

AMEN!!!

UAE, Persian gulf, Aug 1990- Mar 1991.

DESERTSTORMVET.png
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
641
Tokens
Exactly. Obama supporters don't think. In the obama supporters world...

Mccain is for war
Obama is for peace
Mccain is for the rich
Obama is for the poor
Mccain is for oil
Obama is for the enviornment


They don't even look at the policies. They just blindly follow an empty suit and "hope and change". Obama had pretty much the exact same policies as hillary too.

Neither Mccain or Obama are going to end violence anytime soon. I wonder if the pinko liberals that protest all the fighting and wear scream masks and all black and march are going to do that if Obama is in office.

Those idiots will still probably be protesting bush. :missingte

Bush phucked this country for many years to come, it may never recover. I voted for Obama today and if he wins and does not do well, in 4 years i will vote for someone else. But not for another Bush fascist government.

NY Giant fan since 1962.
2788598621_096ebbcaf7_m.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
2,227
Tokens
Not sure about 100...but 55 years after the fighting ended in Korea we are still in Korea and even longer in Germany despite being allied with their government.

You cannot compare these situations. American troops are in Iraq to stabilise the country (and protect American interests), in Korea to protect the ROKs against North Korea (and protect American interests) and here in Germany now they just keep bases (in the American interest).
If you have a need for your bases you keep them, if you protect against a potential enemy who hasn't gone away yet you stay, but if you only want to stabilise you can leave as soon as you achieved your goal.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,822
Messages
13,573,576
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com