bc they arent effective. nobody who makes a living on betting sports or consistantly makes money over a huge sample size uses them.
bc they arent effective. nobody who makes a living on betting sports or consistantly makes money over a huge sample size uses them.
me bc im not telling people to bet their money based on meaningless coincidental gimmicks that have nothing to do with the actual games- in fact im telling them to actually cap the games (ie look at starters lineups bullpen defense umps and weather) and not coincidental gimicks
what happened in other games in many cases games from years ago has nothing to do with the game your betting on today.
if you look hard enough you can always find some weird trend based on a bunch of bizarre parameters from games past but they in no way affect the game your betting on now. To top it off the sample sizes you're basing this trends on are tiny and mean nothing.If in the example you made to start this thread teams in that spot were 0-15 instead of 15-0 yesterdays game would have played out exactly the same.
That is your opininion, but as you know,opinions are like.......everyone has one.
You are stil not contributing much without posting any plays or informations here.
This is my last answer to you. Good luck with your bets, if you are even betting.
Dogs or small favorites of -120 or less after losing home as -300 + favorites = 0-4. First time Verlander is underdog since October 1st 2011. Detroit is 0-3 the last 3 times Justin was a road underdog. Going with the best home team in the majors and most powerfull starter in majors who leads the entire Mlb in strikeouts. Texas moneyline.