a system play for those into systems

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
929
Tokens
me bc im not telling people to bet their money based on meaningless coincidental gimmicks that have nothing to do with the actual games- in fact im telling them to actually cap the games (ie look at starters lineups bullpen defense umps and weather) and not coincidental gimicks

what happened in other games in many cases games from years ago has nothing to do with the game your betting on today.
if you look hard enough you can always find some weird trend based on a bunch of bizarre parameters from games past but they in no way affect the game your betting on now. To top it off the sample sizes you're basing this trends on are tiny and mean nothing.If in the example you made to start this thread teams in that spot were 0-15 instead of 15-0 yesterdays game would have played out exactly the same.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
929
Tokens
Your statement emphasizes my point succinctly: "most gamblers don't understand their effectiveness."

bc they arent effective. nobody who makes a living on betting sports or consistantly makes money over a huge sample size uses them.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
2,417
Tokens
bc they arent effective. nobody who makes a living on betting sports or consistantly makes money over a huge sample size uses them.

I agree with what you're saying regarding "trends"...no doubt. However, systems are different and I know plenty of people who rely on powerful databases to produce very profitable long term systems...so I have to disagree with you with regard to system plays. The larger the sample size, the more effective the winning systems are....the only trick is finding them.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
53
Tokens
bc they arent effective. nobody who makes a living on betting sports or consistantly makes money over a huge sample size uses them.

That is your opininion, but as you know,opinions are like.......everyone has one.

You are stil not contributing much without posting any plays or informations here.

This is my last answer to you. Good luck with your bets, if you are even betting.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
2,417
Tokens
me bc im not telling people to bet their money based on meaningless coincidental gimmicks that have nothing to do with the actual games- in fact im telling them to actually cap the games (ie look at starters lineups bullpen defense umps and weather) and not coincidental gimicks

what happened in other games in many cases games from years ago has nothing to do with the game your betting on today.
if you look hard enough you can always find some weird trend based on a bunch of bizarre parameters from games past but they in no way affect the game your betting on now. To top it off the sample sizes you're basing this trends on are tiny and mean nothing.If in the example you made to start this thread teams in that spot were 0-15 instead of 15-0 yesterdays game would have played out exactly the same.

You do understand there is an enormous difference between "trends" and "systems"...correct?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
929
Tokens
That is your opininion, but as you know,opinions are like.......everyone has one.

You are stil not contributing much without posting any plays or informations here.

This is my last answer to you. Good luck with your bets, if you are even betting.

lol@"if I even bet"Yes you're right the only people in the world who bet on sports are people who post their picks online.
You are correct, everyone has an opinion and ours obviously differ and that's not going to change, so I'll leave your threads alone.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
53
Tokens
Starters with 7-8 wins and 0-1 losses, favored by -141/-164 are 0-10 against teams that lost last game. If the favorite won last game and is playing at home, their record is 0-7 losing all 7 games by 4 or more.

Moore less than impressive in last two starts with a WHIP of 2.1 and over 20 pitches per inning pitched. Lackey pitched his best game of the season in his last start.

Boston +131
 

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
53
Tokens
Moore only has 6 wins. This still applies?

Thanks for pointing that out. Same system for starters with 5-8 wins is 4-22. So, still a good fade material. By the way Boston 5-0 this season in series openers if they lost the last game of previous series.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
53
Tokens
Another simple system.

Game 3,after winning on the road in extra innings:150 unders, 95 overs.

Under 8 in Oakland Wednesday.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
53
Tokens
Dogs or small favorites of -120 or less after losing home as -300 + favorites = 0-4. First time Verlander is underdog since October 1st 2011. Detroit is 0-3 the last 3 times Justin was a road underdog. Going with the best home team in the majors and most powerfull starter in majors who leads the entire Mlb in strikeouts. Texas moneyline.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
53
Tokens
Dogs or small favorites of -120 or less after losing home as -300 + favorites = 0-4. First time Verlander is underdog since October 1st 2011. Detroit is 0-3 the last 3 times Justin was a road underdog. Going with the best home team in the majors and most powerfull starter in majors who leads the entire Mlb in strikeouts. Texas moneyline.

3-2-1 bases


Another simple system...Winners of 5 straight or more after a road win in extra innings = 43 unders & 13 overs.

Cingrani and Lee both with ERA under 3. Together, they have 80 Ks and 16 walks.

Under 7.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,924
Messages
13,464,188
Members
99,499
Latest member
summitfence089
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com