919 Care to make a ban bet on the Trump - Russia conspiracy?

[GasMan]

1 year - Trump goes down I leave for a year
1 year - Trump doesn't go down you leave for a year

Only matters to do with the Russia - Trump election conspiracy theory

Hell, lets throw $500 on it as well

We'll have to put some kind of time limit on it though...let's say by the next election

You got the balls, nut job?

 

[919]

I have no idea whether or not Trump knew members of his campaign were working with Russians. He may get impeached, he may not. I also don't bet on futures 4 years out.

I will bet you and Sherrie Joe, gasman, and Willie, ace, and zit that someone associated with Trump's campaign is indicted for working with Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Permanent ban bet from either this forum or all of therx. Up to you.

 

[ScottL]

*These ban bets are beyond stupid!






























*unless they result in The Guesser leaving

 

[919]

*These ban bets are beyond stupid!






























*unless they result in The Guesser leaving

I don't disagree. Just trying to oblidge gasman because he seems to want me banned lol

 

[roadreeler57]

I have no idea whether or not Trump knew members of his campaign were working with Russians. He may get impeached, he may not. I also don't bet on futures 4 years out.

I will bet you and Sherrie Joe, gasman, and Willie, ace, and zit that someone associated with Trump's campaign is indicted for working with Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Permanent ban bet from either this forum or all of therx. Up to you.

Not taking the bet but this looks like a good bet because the Russians had nothing to do with our election...This bullshit was all dreamed up for a smokescreen by the Communist Democrats to try & hide what they have been trying to do to the country for the past 50 years & that is to turn the US Socialist first & then Communist......The Democrat/Communist party wants control & ownership over everything including your house.....

 

[Enfuego]

I have no idea whether or not Trump knew members of his campaign were working with Russians. He may get impeached, he may not. I also don't bet on futures 4 years out.

I will bet you and Sherrie Joe, gasman, and Willie, ace, and zit that someone associated with Trump's campaign is indicted for working with Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Permanent ban bet from either this forum or all of therx. Up to you.

There's no proof in any form or fashion Russians influenced the 2016 U.S. Election. You have to have the "what" before you have a "who."

 

[Willie99]

Good god they are uninformed, gullible, stupid fucking idiots. Democratic leadership and their complicit media say the stupid stuff they do because they know the 919's of this world will swallow whole without reflex and regurgitate

919 is an enabler

 

[Willie99]

I don't believe in ban bets, never have, said so many times.

I will bet anything from 1k to 5k that nobody from the Trump campaign is convicted of conspiring with the Russians to impact the 2016 presidential election. We'll give it two years, the trial has to begin within 2 years.

Any bet >2k will have to be post up. I don't give a fuck about 1k, but I'm not going to let anybody free roll me for 5k.

Somebody calls me out, I'm right here, as always

 

[GasMan]

I have no idea whether or not Trump knew members of his campaign were working with Russians. He may get impeached, he may not. I also don't bet on futures 4 years out.

I will bet you and Sherrie Joe, gasman, and Willie, ace, and zit that someone associated with Trump's campaign is indicted for working with Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Permanent ban bet from either this forum or all of therx. Up to you.

Someone associated with Trump's campaign? Please be more specific. Hell, anyone who made a donation could be considered associated.

 

[CarolinaKid]

GM 919 does nothing but watch the media he knows nothing about what the real story is, sad but true.

 

[candy7]

GM 919 does nothing but watch the media he knows nothing about what the real story is, sad but true.

you are spot on with your analysis and, in addition, he is nothing but an attention whore, with his green fonts, and must always have the last word. dont waste your time with him as he is just another irrelevant narcissist.

 

[919]

you are spot on with your analysis and, in addition, he is nothing but an attention whore, with his green fonts, and must always have the last word. dont waste your time with him as he is just another irrelevant narcissist.

The green fonts are from twitter lol

 

[919]

Good god I am an uninformed, gullible, stupid fucking idiot. Donald Trump says stupid stuff and lies every damn day because they know the Willie's of this world will swallow whole without reflex and regurgitate

I am an idiot

Fify

 

[Willie99]

you offered to bet, I'm here

let's see who's informed and who's not

 

[candy7]

The green fonts are from twitter lol

you still are irrelevant. lol

 

[919]

Hey y'all. I was watchin the TV in the salon while I was gettin my hair and nails done but couldn't hear what that colored fella Obama was sayin cause the dryer was on I bet it was more liberal lies.

You're weird

 

[CarolinaKid]

number 1 dude i did not post that statement

 

[CarolinaKid]

bottom line dude, im not sure why you are even posting as you know nothing, i mean nothing on the subject, hell i was with the rep chairperson for a event in char nc 2 weeks ago on a monday and then again on tuesday in ral nc for a event, when you as a person can add something for real go for it until then stop posting crap in all threads, again you know nothing

 

[919]

i was with the rep chairperson for a event in char nc 2 weeks ago on a monday and then again on tuesday in ral nc for a event, and we got mani pedis together and then met up with some Russians that were in town

Interesting

 

[919]

[h=2]Why the Sally Yates Hearing Was Very Bad News for the Trump White House[/h]

The president just lost his favorite piece of spin for countering the Russia scandal.DAVID CORN MAY. 8, 2017 5:39 PM​

Carolyn Kaster/AP

The much-anticipated Senate hearing on Monday afternoon with former acting attorney general Sally Yates and former director of national intelligence James Clapper confirmed an important point: the Russia story still poses tremendous trouble for President Donald Trump and his crew.


Yates recounted a disturbing tale. She recalled that on January 26, she requested and received a meeting with Don McGahn, Trump's White House counsel. At the time, Vice President Mike Pence and other White House officials were saying that ret. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, Trump's national security adviser, had not spoken the month before with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, about the sanctions then-President Barack Obama had imposed on the Russians as punishment for Moscow's meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. Yates' Justice Department had evidence—presumably intercepts of Flynn's communications with Kislyak—that showed this assertion was flat-out false.


At that meeting, Yates shared two pressing concerns with McGahn: that Flynn had lied to the vice president and that Flynn could now be blackmailed by the Russians because they knew he had lied about his conversations with Kislyak. As Yates told the members of the Senate subcommittee on crime and terrorism, "To state the obvious: you don't want your national security adviser compromised by the Russians." She and McGahn also discussed whether Flynn had violated any laws.

The next day, McGahn asked Yates to return to the White House, and they had another discussion. According to Yates, McGahn asked whether it would interfere with the FBI's ongoing investigation of Flynn if the White House took action regarding this matter. No, Yates said she told him. The FBI had already interviewed Flynn. And Yates explained to the senators that she had assumed that the White House would not sit on the information she presented McGahn and do nothing.


But that's what the White House did. McGahn in that second meeting did ask if the White House could review the evidence the Justice Department had. She agreed to make it available. (Yates testified that she did not know whether this material was ever reviewed by the White House. She was fired at that point because she would not support Trump's Muslim travel ban.) Whether McGahn examined that evidence about Flynn, the White House did not take action against him. It stood by Flynn. He remained in the job, hiring staff for the National Security Council and participating in key policy decision-making.


On February 9, the Washington Post revealed that Flynn had indeed spoken with Kislyak about the sanctions. And still the Trump White House backed him up. Four days later, Kellyanne Conway, a top Trump White House official, declared that Trump still had "full confidence" in Flynn. The next day—as a media firestorm continued—Trump fired him. Still, the day after he canned Flynn, Trump declared, "Gen. Flynn is a wonderful man. I think he has been treated very, very unfairly by the media, as I call it, the fake media in many cases. And I think it is really a sad thing that he was treated so badly." Trump displayed no concern about Flynn's misconduct.
The conclusion from Yates' testimony was clear: Trump didn't dump Flynn until the Kislyak matter became a public scandal and embarrassment. The Justice Department warning—hey, your national security adviser could be compromised by the foreign government that just intervened in the American presidential campaign—appeared to have had no impact on Trump's actions regarding Flynn. Imagine what Republicans would say if a President Hillary Clinton retained as national security adviser a person who could be blackmailed by Moscow.


The subcommittee's hearing was also inconvenient for Trump and his supporters on another key topic: it destroyed one of their favorite talking points.

On March 5, Clapper was interviewed by NBC News' Chuck Todd on Meet the Press and asked if there was any evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. "Not to my knowledge," Clapper replied. Since then, Trump and his champions have cited Clapper to say there is no there there with the Russia story. Trump on March 20 tweeted, "James Clapper and others stated that there is no evidence Potus colluded with Russia. The story is FAKE NEWS and everyone knows it!" White House press secretary Sean Spicer has repeatedly deployed this Clapper statement to insist there was no collusion.


At Monday's hearing, Clapper pulled this rug out from under the White House and its comrades. He noted that it was standard policy for the FBI not to share with him details about ongoing counterintelligence investigations. And he said he had not been aware of the FBI's investigation of contacts between Trump associates and Russia that FBI director James Comey revealed weeks ago at a House intelligence committee hearing. Consequently, when Clapper told Todd that he was not familiar with any evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, he was speaking accurately. But he essentially told the Senate subcommittee that he was not in a position to know for certain. This piece of spin should now be buried. Trump can no longer hide behind this one Clapper statement.


Clapper also dropped another piece of information disquieting for the Trump camp. Last month, the Guardian reported that British intelligence in late 2015 collected intelligence on suspicious interactions between Trump associates and known or suspected Russian agents and passed this information to to the United States "as part of a routine exchange of information."Asked about this report, Clapper said it was "accurate." He added, "The specifics are quite sensitive." This may well have been the first public confirmation from an intelligence community leader that US intelligence agencies have possessed secret information about ties between Trump's circle and Moscow. (Comey testified that the FBI's counterintelligence investigation of links between Trump associates and Russian began in late July 2016.)


So this hearing indicated that the Trump White House protected a national security adviser who lied and who could be compromised by Moscow, that Trump can no longer cite Clapper to claim there was no collusion, and that US intelligence had sensitive information on interactions between Trump associates and possible Russian agents as early as late 2015. Still, most of the Republicans on the panel focused on leaks and "unmasking"—not the main issues at hand. They collectively pounded more on Yates for her action regarding the Muslim travel ban than on Moscow for its covert operation to subvert the 2016 election to help Trump.


This Senate subcommittee, which is chaired by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), is not mounting a full investigation comparable to the inquiry being conducted by the Senate intelligence committee (and presumably the hobbled House intelligence committee). It has far less staff, and its jurisdiction is limited. But this hearing demonstrated that serious inquiry can expand the public knowledge of the Trump-Russia scandal—and that there remains much more to examine and unearth.