- Status
"H" posted about an hour ago & is on:
"253 Cleveland +7.5 SIA -18"
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/
BOL, fellas!
:smoking:
"S" has 6 wagers for today:
L.A. Chargers -14½ -104 over MIAMI
Oakland +6 -103 over INDIANAPOLIS
Tampa Bay +9 -107 over L.A. RAMS
ARIZONA +5 -110 over Seattle
DENVER -2½ -105 over Jacksonville
CHICAGO -2½ +115 over Minnesota
"S" : 23-9, +31.17 units YTD (=2019-2020 season) with NFL-X included.
BOL, guys!
:smokingbb
L.A. Chargers -14½ -104 over MIAMI
Oakland +6 -103 over INDIANAPOLIS
Tampa Bay +9 -107 over L.A. RAMS
ARIZONA +5 -110 over Seattle
DENVER -2½ -105 over Jacksonville
CHICAGO -2½ +115 over Minnesota
"S" : 23-9, +31.17 units YTD (=2019-2020 season) with NFL-X included.
BOL, guys!
:smokingbb
shamrock88 :toast:
damkay66 :toast:
:toast:
For interested in MLB wagering, i've posted "H"s bet for tonight in the MLB forum here:
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1144401
damkay66 :toast:
:toast:
For interested in MLB wagering, i've posted "H"s bet for tonight in the MLB forum here:
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1144401
lionking, here are his stats:
| 2004 | 1-0-0 (+2.00) |
| 2005 | 148-170-1 (+77.00) |
| 2006 | 155-203-21 (+3.00) |
| 2007 | 145-201-7 (-22.00) |
| 2008 | 164-206-13 (+10.00) |
| 2009 | 162-194-40 (+25.00) |
| 2010 | 170-186-34 (+60.00) |
| 2011 | 181-212-4 (+25.00) |
| 2012 | 117-144-0 (-2.00) |
| 2013 | 175-220-0 (-3.00) |
| 2014 | 195-225-0 (+36.00) |
| 2015 | 204-259-0 (+2.00) |
| 2016 | 163-218-0 (-9.00) |
| 2017 | 184-236-0 (-7.00) |
| 2018 | 156-232-0 (-59.00) |
You're opinion is certainly welcome, sir (exploited17). I assume your comment i've quoted refers to "S"'s NHL record rather than his NFL record. If you feel you have good reasons for not following his NHL picks then, of course, you are free to do so. Just as others are free to do with them what they please, whether to fade, follow or ignore, etc. I'm just posting the info. What you do with it is up to you.
There are those who see the glass half full & those who see it half empty. Those who look at the "big picture" instead of only the negative. Those who are not "what have you done for me lately only" promoters.
The big picture is, in all sports combined, "S" has had a winning year in 9 of the past 10. The "big picture" is he has had a winning NHL season in 9 of 15 years & is up in units in that sport overall.
If 97% of gamblers are long-term or lifelong losers, then they probably would have been better off following someone like "S", "H" or "G" instead, don't you agree?
Regarding your comment "only 2 winning seasons worth anything", i don't understand that remark. In the NHL record i posted i see 9 winning seasons including seasons of +77, +10, +25, +60, +25, +36 units & 3 other winning seasons. In those 9 years he won 242 units. In the 6 losing years he only lost 102 units. So overall that would make him +140 units won in NHL alone.
Some people prefer to follow those who are recently hot so, in view of his recent poor record in the NHL, they might not like to follow "S" in the NHL. Someone might think that maybe he has lost his NHL mojo. Others may even consider him a good fade in that sport. It's up to you.
If following the recently hot pickster is one's preference, then perhaps the NFL picks of "S" & "H" will be of interest.
I hope that helps, sir.
Best of luck in all your sports gambling investments.
"Live long & prosper"!
:smoking:
Great knowledge and information thanks for posting my Appreciate allYou're opinion is certainly welcome, sir (exploited17). I assume your comment i've quoted refers to "S"'s NHL record rather than his NFL record. If you feel you have good reasons for not following his NHL picks then, of course, you are free to do so. Just as others are free to do with them what they please, whether to fade, follow or ignore, etc. I'm just posting the info. What you do with it is up to you.
There are those who see the glass half full & those who see it half empty. Those who look at the "big picture" instead of only the negative. Those who are not "what have you done for me lately only" promoters.
The big picture is, in all sports combined, "S" has had a winning year in 9 of the past 10. The "big picture" is he has had a winning NHL season in 9 of 15 years & is up in units in that sport overall.
If 97% of gamblers are long-term or lifelong losers, then they probably would have been better off following someone like "S", "H" or "G" instead, don't you agree?
Regarding your comment "only 2 winning seasons worth anything", i don't understand that remark. In the NHL record i posted i see 9 winning seasons including seasons of +77, +10, +25, +60, +25, +36 units & 3 other winning seasons. In those 9 years he won 242 units. In the 6 losing years he only lost 102 units. So overall that would make him +140 units won in NHL alone.
Some people prefer to follow those who are recently hot so, in view of his recent poor record in the NHL, they might not like to follow "S" in the NHL. Someone might think that maybe he has lost his NHL mojo. Others may even consider him a good fade in that sport. It's up to you.
If following the recently hot pickster is one's preference, then perhaps the NFL picks of "S" & "H" will be of interest.
I hope that helps, sir.
Best of luck in all your sports gambling investments.
"Live long & prosper"!
:smoking:
- Status
