60% Winners - Year Long Thread (May 7th-Start)

[sixty.percent.winners]

I use the term 60% winners because that is my goal for each year. Using -110 lines as a standard, and flat betting every game you need to win 55% of the time to break even. This is why most bettors do not succeed at sports wagering. I wager on 5 plays everyday, but do take small breaks at points of each sporting season. I am to have 1500 wagers each year, winning 900 and losing 600. Most seasons I succeed this point, but I have had a losing season or two, like every other bettor in the world. I will start posting today, and do not ask for past records. I have won a lot in the past, but when betting on sports your past records means shit all to the future. When you think you are better than everyone else, you stop trying and handicap the games different so you have to keep leveled. I apologize to anyone who read all this crap, I just had to vent.

Back with plays soon.

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

I forgot to mention I do not bet games with vigs higher than -115, and rarely bet underdogs higher than +130.

 

[Twistedheat]

I'd just like to point out that for a -110 line, to breakeven you would need to hit 52.38%.

Hitting 53% at -110 line over an MLB season of 2430 games would leave you with ~ +29 units. Hitting 55% -110 line over a 2430 MLB season would give you ~+120 units. (Units based on risking 1 unit to win 0.90909 units).

 

[ArizonaBound]

twisted is correct. 52.38% break even at -110 juice. 55% at -110 would make you, or anyone else for that matter, very wealthy if you were playing for any signficant amount of money. 60% will not happen at 1500 plays a year (4 per day average). I admire the confidence and it is a great goal to have but NOBODY hits 60% for a career and few have done it for a year over all sports. good luck

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

twisted is correct. 52.38% break even at -110 juice. 55% at -110 would make you, or anyone else for that matter, very wealthy if you were playing for any signficant amount of money. 60% will not happen at 1500 plays a year (4 per day average). I admire the confidence and it is a great goal to have but NOBODY hits 60% for a career and few have done it for a year over all sports. good luck

Sorry, I was very tired when I wrote this. You are correct with the math.

To say NOBODY hits 60% for a career, is a lie. Although 99% of handicappers lose, there are still many who win and who hit over 60% for a career. Since I started tracking my record, seven years ago, I have hit 63.8% of my wagers. Betting on five games per night, on average 300 days per year. I have had losing seasons, but I have also had seasons where I won 68% of my games.

I will post, and you can watch, tail or fade. GL

 

[crazy]

I'm slightly above 60% all year all sports included and I don't play high favs either, Mj too is above that mark across the board

 

[thatoneguy]

so where the plays at? i'm excited

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

May 8th

ALL BETS TO WIN 100$.

St. Louis + Cincinnati over 8.5 -120
Atlanta + Philadelphia under 9.5 -110
Seattle + Minnesota under 9 +105
Detroit + Cleveland under 8.5 -110
Kansas City Royals -115

 

[Twistedheat]

May 8th

ALL BETS TO WIN 100$.

St. Louis + Cincinnati over 8.5 -120
Atlanta + Philadelphia under 9.5 -110
Seattle + Minnesota under 9 +105
Detroit + Cleveland under 8.5 -110
Kansas City Royals -115

Hmm, I find it very strange that all of my "totals" bets are exactly the same as yours. I wonder if that is a good sign or not?

I'm on the opposite side to you for the KC/LAA matchup though. Best of luck!

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Hmm, I find it very strange that all of my "totals" bets are exactly the same as yours. I wonder if that is a good sign or not?

I'm on the opposite side to you for the KC/LAA matchup though. Best of luck!

Not to offend, but I do not even know who you are; so that is indeed very strange.

Smart minds think alike, or is it fools seldom differ?

haha, take it easy

 

[Rambo]

You said you dont bet on games when its higher then -115 yet one of your picks today is -120.

 

[Twistedheat]

Not to offend, but I do not even know who you are; so that is indeed very strange.

Smart minds think alike, or is it fools seldom differ?

haha, take it easy

Let's hope for the former, over the latter. :toast:

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Tracked record : 2-3 -120$ (40%)

ALL PLAYS TO WIN 100$

May 9th:
Toronto & Oakland under 8.5 -105
New York & Baltimore over 11 -115
Florida & Colorado under 9.5 -114
Kansas City Royals -115
Toronto Blue Jays -110

 

[ArizonaBound]

Sorry, I was very tired when I wrote this. You are correct with the math.

To say NOBODY hits 60% for a career, is a lie. Although 99% of handicappers lose, there are still many who win and who hit over 60% for a career. Since I started tracking my record, seven years ago, I have hit 63.8% of my wagers. Betting on five games per night, on average 300 days per year. I have had losing seasons, but I have also had seasons where I won 68% of my games.

I will post, and you can watch, tail or fade. GL

Not trying to pick an internet squabble with you, but I stand by my statement that NOBODY hits 60% at an adjusted -110 for a CAREER.
Until you can give legit examples of this than it does not happen and hasn't happened. Also, I was referring to all cappers, but in general we were discussing cappers that have an average of 4 plays per day like you allege to playing. NOBODY has and NOBODY will hit 60% for a career. Yes, guys like MJ hit 60% but he releases 4 plays a week or two weeks, not a day. I am willing to bet even he, who is one of the best selective cappers I have seen in 15 years, still does not have a DOCUMENTED 60% IN ALL SPORTS AT AN ADJUSTED -110 JUICE.
Statistically the odds are so high against this. On top of that, I challenge someone to show me someone documented for more than 1 season or two, with multiple plays per day....Hell even at one play per day.

AGAIN, GOOD LUCK. NOT ROOTING AGAINST YOU, JUST POINTING OUT THE TRUTH.

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Tracked record : 5-5 -40$ (50%)

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Tracked record : 5-5 -40$ (50%)

ALL PLAYS TO WIN 100$!

May 10th:

Atlanta Braves +125
Cincinnati Reds -115
New York & Baltimore under 9.5 -110
Baltimore Orioles +120
San Diego & Houston under 8 +100

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

bump up

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Tracked record : 7-8 -138$ (47%)

all bets to win 100$

New York Mets -1.5 +110
Atlanta & NYM under 7 -105
Cincinnati & Arizona under 9 +100
Cincinnati Reds +115
Cleveland Indians -1.5 +140

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Tracked record : 9-11 -233$ (45%)

All bets to win 100$.

Colorado Rockies -1.5 +120
Chicago Cubs -1.5 +122
Los Angeles Angels -105
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 +125
Kansas City & Oakland over 8.5 -110

 

[sixty.percent.winners]

Tracked record : 13-12 +84$ (52%)