i still cant understand how its a "free bonus" if you have to pay if you lose it? seems to me it is simply credit, and retarded credit at that, as there is a rollover attached to it.
of course, to someone who may not normally be eligible for credit, it may be a good deal in that sense, but to those who have access to credit it makes no sense.
although, maybe im missing something
of course, to someone who may not normally be eligible for credit, it may be a good deal in that sense, but to those who have access to credit it makes no sense.
although, maybe im missing something
Good question. My math is probably wrong but I think it depends on the vig (like always). Say you bet all the remaining MLB games on the under total for each day. Total $ in your account/number of games per day is your bet size. Enough bets that the variance would probably not get you in a bad swing and you could make wagering requirements in time. Assuming a -105 line, the juice would grind you down to zero (variance not withstanding). $100000 wag. req.* 5%= $5000 or the amount offered. So if the lines served are equal to or worse than -105, I say there is no value.
