4 Saturday w/analysis

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
RangeWLP+/- (Units)
Yesterday010.00-2.00
Last 30 Days29310.00+12.50
Season to Date30350.00+6.58

All plays are for 2 units

ARIZONA +115 over N.Y. Rangers

OT included. The Rangers are 9-4 and have won four in a row and six of their past seven. Recently, New York defeated Washington, 5-2. The Rangers’ record looks shiny and that win over Washington puts a stamp on their strong start but we’re not buying any of it. The Caps were all over the Rangers in a bad way. New York’s defense was running around in their own end practically the entire night. Washington outshot New York 34-21 and had a huge Corsi for percentage/advantage of 67%. The Rangers played most of that game without the puck. The Rangers other three wins over their current four-game streak came against Calgary, Toronto and Colorado and New York was not dominant in any of them. This is a Rangers team that ranks 27th in puck possession. They rank 24th in shots against and the only reason they’re winning so many games lately is due to nothing but pure puck luck. Regression is on the way. After playing in Colorado last night, Henrik Lundqvist is very likely going to get the day off here. Even if he does not, we’re still playing the Coyotes.


The Coyotes went into New York on Oct 22 and lost 4-1. Arizona outshot the Rangers 35-27 and held a 53-47% puck possession advantage. The ‘Yotes have now won three of their past five games. One of those defeats occurred against Vancouver and once again, Arizona held a significant edge in shots on goal and puck possession. Arizona is one of the best-coached teams in the league. They’ve held their past four opponents to 28 shots or fewer. The Coyotes are a team that few watch. The market is completely unaware of how difficult an out they’ve been all season long and how greatly they have improved from a year ago. You take some enthusiastic young talent, give them some great coaching and some victories over some elite talent (they have wins over Pitt and L.A. already) and anything is possible. What we know for sure is that the Coyotes bring it every game. They love coming to the rink and it shows in their efforts. There are some ex-Rangers on the Coyotes that will also be a little extra jacked up to face them again. The Rangers could get caught napping here after playing in Colorado last night but even if that isn’t the case, give Arizona a great chance to beat this overrated team that is playing much worse than their record indicates.


BUFFALO +135 over Vancouver
OT included. The Canucks have three wins in their last nine games with two of those victories occurring against the Coyotes and Flyers. We know this Canucks team is highly competitive and a tough out but they are still not good enough to be road chalk, especially in a matinee game on the East Coast that starts at 1:00 PM EST. Against Arizona, the Canucks were outshot, 31-22 and they mustered just 20 shots on net in their last game against the Penguins.


This wager however, is more about sticking with the undervalued Sabres than it is about fading the Canucks. Buffalo is coming off a 4-1 loss to the Lightning but Tampa scored three goals early to put the Sabres in a deep hole. After the first period in which the Bolts scored three times on 12 shots, Buffalo allowed just 10 shots on net the rest of the way. This is still an outstanding puck possession team with a Corsi for percentage that ranks sixth in the NHL. Vancouver’s puck possession percentage ranks third last in the NHL ahead of only Detroit and Colorado. The Sabres 26.8 shots against per game ranks third in the league. We had our concerns about the Sabres being flat after four days off against Tampa Bay and even mentioned it in our write-up but they’ll be no such concern for this one. After the first period on Thursday, the Sabres were not flat. Lightning goalie Andrei Vasilevskiy was under siege in Thursday's second period. Not everything is about shots on net or puck possession but it’s a good barometer of how teams are playing. Buffalo has playmakers, a strong set of forwards and a solid defense that moves the puck out efficiently. Buffalo is still not getting market respect and until that changes, we are not going to let up in trying to take advantage of some favorable lines. This line is hugely favorable and frankly, we’re not even sure the Canucks warrant being favored.


St. Louis +112 over NASHVILLE
OT included. We like the Predators as a team. They have a talented collection of youth and veterans and they almost always have a fighters chance to win. It’s a rare day when the Preds are out of a game. However, Nashville returns home from a difficult four-game trip through San Jose, Los Angeles, Anaheim and Minnesota. They went 2-2 on said trip, winning in San Jose and Minnesota both by one goal while losing to the Ducks and Kings. We also still have our doubts about Pekka Rinne, who has posted save percentages of .857, .862 and .862 again in three of his past six starts. Every time we watch this guy play, he’s flopping around making more lucky saves then we care to count. Rinne gets lots of positive press and is sitting with a 1.98 GAA and .926 save percentage overall this year but we’re not liking what we visually see. We don’t have the stats to back it up yet but we see Rinne as a liability and not an asset. That’s just an opinion but we’re suggesting his numbers are in for a big-time correction.


Meanwhile, the Blues are still a regular season juggernaut with outstanding numbers both below and above the surface. St. Louis has won four of five with only loss over that span occurring against the Kings. The Blue Notes are also getting healthier, as Kevin Shattenkirk returns for this one while Vladimir Tarasenko also returned this week. The Blue Notes are 9-3-1 after playing the fourth toughest schedule in the league. They are a top-5 team in just about every category, which includes puck possession, where they rank second in the league behind Washington. The Blues are certainly worth a close look when taking back a tag and we especially like that they catch the Preds coming back off that West Coast trip.


Florida +133 over LOS ANGELES
OT included. The Kings went on a dominant 7-0 run recently, which proved once again just how difficult they can be. Since then, however, Los Angeles has dropped two of three to Chicago and Columbus. We would not have our concerns about a couple of losses if they were just that but L.A. is going into its second straight year of inconsistencies. The Kings were streaky all of last season and they’ve been streaky this year with three losses to begin the season, followed by seven wins, followed by losing two of three. We have seen the Kings get lazy at home too for stretches. The Kings are a dangerous team indeed but also one that cannot be trusted in this price range against this quality intruder.


Florida’s stock is low again after four straight losses and that makes us instant buyers at this price. The Panthers will play the final game of a three-game trip to the West Coast and so far they have just one point to show for it. That was against Anaheim on Wednesday when the Panthers blew a 2-1 lead with five seconds remaining in regulation. Thursday night in San Jose, the Panthers were flat as hell and sloppy. Their Coach, Gerard Gallant called it the teams’ worst performance of the year. What follows a poor effort is usually a strong one and so we’ll put that to the test here. Florida is completely off the radar. They’re not scoring a lot and they’re not winning a lot but this is now dig-down deep time to try and salvage a game on this trip. The Panthers are too talented to keep losing at this pace but in their defense they have played a tough schedule recently with games against Dallas, Pittsburgh, Chicago Anaheim and San Jose, all on the road and games at home against Washington and Boston. The bottom line here is that this is a game between two decent teams in which a favorite that lacks explosiveness is tasked with spotting a huge tag to a proven underdog performer that plays efficiently in all areas. We’ll bite.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
5,745
Tokens
Good luck today. I like the plays!
 

seer
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
14,000
Tokens
i like van. it is miller's return gm and van will be fired up to protect him. van wins say 2-0 for the shutout perhaps.
in advanced analysis there are charts how teams perform with a lead. most teams sit back and let the other teams attack them is why
corsi numbers show teams such as van and det low on shots.

when u speak of value u have a book that allows u to play reg only
therefore you can plus money or value as u call it on any way you want. you can get van at plus money by playing them regulation
the best money value are ots which pay +260ish which i dont see u play at all.
u can sprinkle a little ot money to hedge off a larger wager on the dog or getting the reg line
 

seer
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
14,000
Tokens
question for u: when u select these gms do u visualize the team u select having far better chances, more shots and more time of posession than the team your against?
right now van as i am watching this game as unbiased as i can. van has had the better scoring chances by far.
they lead 15-4 on shots after one period if not for the buffalo goalie this should be 2-0 van.
were u expecting van to come up flat being an early start with buf leading after one and firing more shots than van with the better scoring opps?
 

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
372
Tokens
Sherwood- What do you think of the Leafs' goaltending? I've been hesitant to bet the Leafs because they lack a true #1, imo.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Messages
50
Tokens
love the write ups! Great start with the Buffalo play.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
Sherwood- What do you think of the Leafs' goaltending? I've been hesitant to bet the Leafs because they lack a true #1, imo.
Leafs goaltending is weak, which makes them unplayable when they're favored. Both Reimer and Bernier are allowing to many softies.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
question for u: when u select these gms do u visualize the team u select having far better chances, more shots and more time of posession than the team your against?
right now van as i am watching this game as unbiased as i can. van has had the better scoring chances by far.
they lead 15-4 on shots after one period if not for the buffalo goalie this should be 2-0 van.
were u expecting van to come up flat being an early start with buf leading after one and firing more shots than van with the better scoring opps?

I don't envision anything. Vancouver should have had a lead after 1 but so what.....I have bet 100's of games where I had the better team and lost. I usually play dogs, so I'm looking for a team that has a 50% win expectation or thereabouts depending on the price. I'm looking for undervalued teams to be on or overvalued teams to bet against. Buffalo is undervalued. They have very good analytical numbers and they were at home. That early start had some influence but Vancouver was not flat so the early start obviously didn't bother them. I don't and have never played the games out in my head. Vancouver is an average team spotting significant juice on the road against a team that is has better numbers than they do in many areas. Buffalo is average too but they weren't the ones spotting 35 cents. If they were, I would have bet Vancouver and lost.
 

seer
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
14,000
Tokens
right u bet on value not played out who wins or loses. makes sense how u bet and approach now thanks gl on the rest
 

seer
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
14,000
Tokens
amazing how the blues have won gms with out shattenkirk. i like blues as well hope i didnt jinx u - i am stone cold in nhl atm
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,507
Members
100,887
Latest member
yalkastazi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com