I'm wondering if there is an edge to be found here. A while back, I used to bet big favs 1st half. For example, for the game Duke might be -18, but -9 first half. So I'd take Duke -9 first half. Then if they don't cover, take Duke again the 2nd half. Well, I soon discovered that this is a quick way to loose your money. So now I think the opposite.
Take this past weekend. RI -3 against Xavier. RI was down 8 at the half, and 2nd half line was -3.5. The old me would take RI -3.5, because they were favored before the game, -3.5 now seems like a bargain. They can lose the game by 3 and I'll still win the bet! BUT, as it turned out (as with many games), Xavier covered.
Here is my theory. The line is skewed because of public betting.
Before the above game was played, you had 3 types of people. 1) Bet on Xavier +3, 2) bet on RI -3 and 3) didn't bet. At the half, Xavier was up by 8 and the line was RI-3.5. People #1 bet Xavier, so they'll probably sit on their bet. People #2 won't bet Xavier for fear of being middled, if anything, they will bet RI-3.5 (if they liked RI -3 before the game, they love RI -3.5 (or RI +4.5 for game) for 2nd half. People #3 weren't moved by the line before the game, but gamblers love a bargain. They don't take Xav 2nd half, since they could have had them +3 at the game, or +160 ML. If they take +3.5 at the half, Xav can still win the game and lose the bet. RI-3.5 is the bargain of deal, if anything they lay off, or take the bargain. SOOOOOOOOOO, you have all the motivation for all people on RI-3.5 2nd half, and what happens? Xavier covers. Really though, who is motivated to take Xavier +3.5 at the half???? Who is betting that side???? Besides the sharps...
I've seen it happen time and time again. So now, I go against the public. If I see a team that was favored by 5-9 points and they are down 5-9 points at the half, I take the dog. Yes, the line usually comes out such that the dog must win SU to cover, but you know what, it happens more often than not.
Appreciate thoughts and contructive criticism. It really is a play against public and against your own gut feeling.
Take this past weekend. RI -3 against Xavier. RI was down 8 at the half, and 2nd half line was -3.5. The old me would take RI -3.5, because they were favored before the game, -3.5 now seems like a bargain. They can lose the game by 3 and I'll still win the bet! BUT, as it turned out (as with many games), Xavier covered.
Here is my theory. The line is skewed because of public betting.
Before the above game was played, you had 3 types of people. 1) Bet on Xavier +3, 2) bet on RI -3 and 3) didn't bet. At the half, Xavier was up by 8 and the line was RI-3.5. People #1 bet Xavier, so they'll probably sit on their bet. People #2 won't bet Xavier for fear of being middled, if anything, they will bet RI-3.5 (if they liked RI -3 before the game, they love RI -3.5 (or RI +4.5 for game) for 2nd half. People #3 weren't moved by the line before the game, but gamblers love a bargain. They don't take Xav 2nd half, since they could have had them +3 at the game, or +160 ML. If they take +3.5 at the half, Xav can still win the game and lose the bet. RI-3.5 is the bargain of deal, if anything they lay off, or take the bargain. SOOOOOOOOOO, you have all the motivation for all people on RI-3.5 2nd half, and what happens? Xavier covers. Really though, who is motivated to take Xavier +3.5 at the half???? Who is betting that side???? Besides the sharps...
I've seen it happen time and time again. So now, I go against the public. If I see a team that was favored by 5-9 points and they are down 5-9 points at the half, I take the dog. Yes, the line usually comes out such that the dog must win SU to cover, but you know what, it happens more often than not.
Appreciate thoughts and contructive criticism. It really is a play against public and against your own gut feeling.