2009 NFL Playoffs Picks

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
I will add plays to this thread for the remainder of the playoffs including today when write-ups are complete.

Ravens @ Titans
Play: Ravens +3
Comment:
Pros:
Timing:
I can’t stress the importance of timing and “charting” team’s intrinsic worth over the course of the season. By doing such, one would find that teams value changes frequently rather than staying the same in each and every game. By doing such, one would find that that Ravens have yet to peak, are materially more valuable compared to the time they played the Titans earlier in the season, and are now one of the most dangerous teams in the league. While the Ravens defense has consistently been valued by me as one of the top tier defenses over the course of the season, their offense has earned much more worth during that time. On the other hand, the Titans have peaked a couple of months ago, and have been getting progressively less valuable each passing week heading into the playoffs. Although one could claim that they put it in cruise control during the last month, it is still hard to claim what we have seen of late from this team warrants being equals to their counterparts. Whether they have been in cruise control or not, matching the intensity and form of the Ravens may be a difficult task for the Titans. They have not played for 2 weeks, and their last game of the regular season was treated like a preseason game. This is not the ideal variables in trying to counteract a team who appears to be on cloud 9 right now. In a nutshell, each passing week, it is a less ideal time to play the Ravens. Playing the Titans on the other hand can be construed as the exact opposite.

Fundamentals:
The Ravens offense has gotten progressively better, and are a much more productive and different looking offense than the one the Titans faced in week five. Not only has Flacco gathered much needed experience since then, their running game has also gotten much more potent with the different running techniques and offensive line play. No other team in the leagues run defense is more dependent on one man than the Titans are with Haynesworth. Although he will play today, playing at top form is not probable. Not only will rust be in the cards, but he is still not fully healthy. The same can also be said for another materially importantly lineman in Vander Bosch. With the improved running game from the Ravens coupled with these injuries, backed by a more respectable passing game, and playing a defense slightly worse now than they were when they first met, I find it hard to believe the Ravens will not have some success on the ground. Expect the Ravens to be able to chip away at the field with their power running game, allowing Flacco to work within his means and utilize a first level passing game in which the Titans are most vulnerable defending. What might be underestimated is the experience that Flacco gained last week as well. Backing a team with a rookie quarterback playing on the road can be a costly endeavor, as the chances of them playing below form due to nerves increases. We saw it with Ryan and with Flacco early on. The chances of nerves getting a hold of him now decreases with that road playoff game under his belt. The fundamentals of the Titans passing defense is not as much of a threat to Flacco than other top tier defenses. The reason? Flacco struggles against blitzes and passes rushes that send six. The Titans rarely blitz, and when they do, send predominantly five men. He has also seen this defense, and to an extent, knows what to expect out of them.

The Ravens defense is the best in football. The Titans offense is slightly above average and overmatched here. They are highly dependent on the run and utilizing the change of pace backs to their advantage. The Ravens are not only the best run defense in football, but are highly versatile in terms of being able to defending the power back as well as the speed back in which the Titans possess. The Titans offensive line will also take a huge hit with the absence of Mawae, which is another variable that will diminish the productivity of their ground game. Without being backed by the running game that has allowed Collins to work under the role of manager rather than playmaker, the Titans passing game also has a good chance of faltering. Collins has been backed by a solid running game and excellent pass protection all year. This has masked his true worth and has made him look much better than he really is. Without the running game, and finally the Titans pass protection at a disadvantage, expect Collins to be prone to a poor game. He also lacks the talented wide outs to counter the other deficiencies he will have to face in this game.

Both offenses are slightly above average and face very solid defenses. The difference lies in the underlying fundamentals that create both teams strengths and weaknesses. These fundamentals favor the Ravens.

Injuries:
People often underestimate injuries to players that will play. Their analysis often stops at they will play or not play. This analysis will tends to get one into trouble, as it acknowledges “playing” as a fungible entity. Although both Haynesworth and Vander Bosch will play, their form is expected to be well below their par form, and the amount of plays they play may be limited. For a key player not playing, that would be Mawae, the Titans best offensive lineman, and a savvy veteran needed to anchor a line that will be seeing a lot of complex blitzes.

Battle tested:
The Titans finished with a very impressive record, but only played six teams with winning records. Although they won four, the amount and fashion of games won against winning teams leave a lot to be desired. Their win against the Ravens was helped by referees and they were outplayed in that game. They also caught the Ravens at a time in which they were not as good as current form. They beat the Vikings at home (the Vikings are not a good road team), a game in which Ferrotte was just getting into things. Dumb Vikings penalties and again referee help masked the Titans unimpressive performance. Their win against the Colts was also predicated on timing. This was before the Colts went on their run, and for most of that game, the Titans were outplayed. The Ravens have faced much more competition and proved themselves for the most part better than the Titans against the quality of teams they have faced. They have proven capable of winning difficult road games as well. They beat Miami twice in Florida, a very difficult task. They also had to face a hot Dallas team a month ago, and beat them up.

Conclusion:
Both teams are very similar in the sense that they rely a lot on their defense and running game for success. The difference in this game is timing. The Ravens are not a team one wants to face right now. The intensity and confidence they are playing with is second to none. Their offense has improved each week and their defense not getting any worse. The Titans intensity and form is in question. Neither has been shown to be much in nearly a month. Their defense is getting worse, more injured, while their offense has also peaked. I will back the hotter team and the points. I like the Ravens.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Cardinals @ Panthers
Play: Under 49.5
Comment:
Value:
Oddsmakers opened up this line at a pretty high price in anticipation of the inflow of Over money to be expected with Cardinals games. The marketplace quickly bid up the price as Over expectations accompanied bettors backing both teams. People liking <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:City><st1:place>Carolina</st1:place></st1:City> predominantly like them because they think the Cardinals can not stop their running game and don’t have an answer for Smith. People who like the Cardinals predominantely like them because they think it are too many points to lay against Warner and an offense that can light up the scoreboard. The result has been a bid up of three points at some shops. Are these expectations justified? Somewhat, but probably already reflected with the opening bid.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p> </o:p>
Cardinals Offense Overrated?
Again, I will reemphasize timing and current form. At one point and time this season, the Cardinals were a top tier offense in the league? Now, they are average at best. Public perception values them less now than during their peak, but is underestimating their material drop off from top form. The results? The Cardinals now possess an overrated and thus overvalued offense. The Cardinals drop off has mainly occurred with their running game, in which at one point of the season (including the time they first faced the Panthers) was respectable. Now they are one of the worst in the league. The chain reaction has resulted in the drop-off in the Cardinals passing game as well. So has the notion that Warner was playing above his head early on, and now playing truer to form. Some pundits think the Cardinals put it on cruise control late in the season and they have proven to have their offense back with their win against the Seahawks and the Falcons. However, such pundits are treading dangerously here. Throw out the Seahawks game. The Seahawks defensive effort is in question, is below average and the Cardinals offense still didn’t impress. The Falcons also have a sub par defense, and the Cardinals offense again was far from impressive. The Cardinals put up 23 offensive points against the Falcons. 7 came from a fleet flicker that was predicated on an outstanding catch. Another 7 was on a 60 yard touchdown off of a 10 yard pass, a blown coverage and mistackle. The Cardinals have yet to prove to be able to chip away at the field the way they were doing early in the season, and Warner once again looked worse than his numbers. Against the Panthers when the Cardinals had a much better offense, they were only capable of putting up 23 points. Warner needed 50 points to do such as well.
<o:p> </o:p>
Fundamentals
The fundamentals favor a lower scoring game than the total suggests. The Cardinals pass a lot, but showed last week they are more than happy to run the ball and grind out yards with James. The Panthers defense has a very high disparity between the quality of their run defense compared to their pass defense. Their pass defense is much more productive. This, coupled with playing on the road should only encourage the Cardinals to try to run as much as possible and grind out yards against the Panthers. Even if they chose to do otherwise, I don’t see the Cardinals having much success. Their passing game has depreciated and can be easily countered by the Panthers pass defense. The injury to Boldin will make him much less of a factor, and will also result in more attention focused on Fitzgerald and Breaston. The most likely way to find success against the Panthers for the Cardinals is to implement a balanced attack that establishes the run and short passes that grind out the field, utilize a slower tempo than they are accustomed too, and eat up a lot of clock.
<o:p> </o:p>
The Panthers do have some advantages on offense. However, expect them to try to also slow down the tempo as they would prefer to avoid a shootout in this game. Their bread and butter is their running game and the Cardinals weakness is their run defense. This leads me to believe the Panthers will implement a heavy dose of running. This is not ideal for a game that needs over 12 points per quarter. The Cardinals run defense also proved capable of stopping a solid running attack last week.
<o:p></o:p>
Value:
Expectations of a high scoring game may be too high in this one. Both teams best chance of finding offensive success is on the ground. The total suggests a shootout. I expect something in-between, and therefore find some value with the Under.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
What would scare me about the Cards under is how bad their D is on the road. They have given up 20+ in every road game except two. The last 7 weeks we are looking at 24, 21, 47, 35, 10, 48, 37
 

FOOTBALL FORECASTOR
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
578
Tokens
Battle tested:
The Titans finished with a very impressive record, but only played six teams with winning records. Although they won four, the amount and fashion of games won against winning teams leave a lot to be desired.

:howdy:Hello buffettgambler...

Very nice write up my friend, however, in the interest of fair and balanced reporting it should be noted that Tennessee actually played seven games against teams with winning records (two games against Indy) and posted a mark of 5-2 straight up in those affairs and that INCLUDES the final game of the season at Indianapolis in which the Titans rested their starters...

...the Titans five wins against teams with winning records came against the Vikings, the Ravens, the Colts, the Bears and the Steelers.

You stated that "Although they won four, the amount and fashion of games won against winning teams leave a lot to be desired"...

Actually the Titans played seven games versus teams with a winning record and won FIVE GAMES of those contests as out lined above with the AVERAGE margin of victory in those wins being 10 points.

The Ravens on the other hand played a total of 8 games against teams with a winning record (played Pittsburgh twice) and LOST 5 of those 8 outings against winning teams in straight up fashion, a deeper look-see reveals that 3 of the Ravens 5 losses against winning teams took place on the road...

...the Ravens lost 20-23 at Pittsburgh, lost 3-31 at Indianapolis, and lost 10-30 at the Giants, Baltimore's other two losses occurred at home against Pittsburgh and Tennessee, the common denominator is that the Ravens lost to Indianapolis and also lost TWICE to Pittsburgh...

...its generally not a good idea to compare apples to oranges, however, the Ravens lost to Pittsburgh TWICE while the Titans blew Pittsburgh out by the final score of 31-14 and they did it when something was on the line (the #1 seed in the AFC), the Titans also defeated the same Colts team by 10 points that slaughtered Baltimore by 28 points.

Once again I enjoyed your write up but felt the other side of the tape had to be told as a means of being fair and balanced...

Take care and be well my friend

Dirtydog

:wink:
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Thanks, BG. To also throw my 2 cent into the fountain...

I have ARI with the 8th best run defense, and 14th best pass defense, hence a better run defense than pass defense.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Dirtydog,
I knew this section of my write-up would be addressed, and I am pleased to see it was from you. Your points are well taken. However, the crux of this section was to show two things: 1. The Titans are less battle tested- they have faced fewer good teams and less dynamic teams 2: Their performances in those games against winning teams were not as good as they would appear on the surface, such as looking at their MOV during those games.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p> </o:p>
I watched their game against the Vikings (twice). In that game, the refs were the deciding factor. They gave them seven free points on a 4<SUP>th</SUP> and 1 on the goaline in which they were stopped. A few other unfavorable calls cost the Vikings anywhere from 3 to 10 points. The Vikings also had a lot of costly unforced errors. The Vikings were actually the team that proved more capable of moving the ball down the field and stopping the opponents offense. They also faced the Vikings when they were far from their peak.
<o:p> </o:p>
Their win against the Ravens also left a lot to be desired. Again, it was helped by favorable calls, and again, they faced the Ravens when they were far from their peak.
<o:p> </o:p>
Their win against the Colts was intrinsically far from a 7 MOV. They at best slightly outplayed the Colts on their surface. The Colts were without Addai, Sanders, and Freeney. Again, they played the Colts far from their peak.
<o:p> </o:p>
The Bears win was not terribly impressive. Firstly, the Bears are a sub par team. Secondly, many facets of their game were downright dominated (their trench play and running game).
<o:p> </o:p>
Their win against the Steelers was their most impressive win. However, not nearly as impressive as a 17 MOV would lead one to believe. The Steelers outplayed them for most of the game, and had the advantage heading into the final quarter. They actually outgained them as well..
<o:p> </o:p>
In fact, in five of the Titans wins against winning teams, they were out gained in four. In their two losses, they were decisively out gained. No, nominal yard analysis is also surface capping, but also enough to conclude that 10 point MOV is moot and misleading.
<o:p> </o:p>
Your points on the Ravens are also well taken. But. Also on the surface their record against winning teams is a bit misleading. Yes, they laid a couple eggs against quality teams. But none during the last couple of months in which they have become a materially better team. Their losses to the Steelers could have easily been wins, and they outplayed the Titans in that loss. Their wins against quality teams left little doubt, including road wins against the Cowboys and twice against <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:City><st1:place>Miami</st1:place></st1:City>.
<o:p> </o:p>
Best of luck this week.


:howdy:Hello buffettgambler...

Very nice write up my friend, however, in the interest of fair and balanced reporting it should be noted that Tennessee actually played seven games against teams with winning records (two games against Indy) and posted a mark of 5-2 straight up in those affairs and that INCLUDES the final game of the season at Indianapolis in which the Titans rested their starters...

...the Titans five wins against teams with winning records came against the Vikings, the Ravens, the Colts, the Bears and the Steelers.

You stated that "Although they won four, the amount and fashion of games won against winning teams leave a lot to be desired"...

Actually the Titans played seven games versus teams with a winning record and won FIVE GAMES of those contests as out lined above with the AVERAGE margin of victory in those wins being 10 points.

The Ravens on the other hand played a total of 8 games against teams with a winning record (played Pittsburgh twice) and LOST 5 of those 8 outings against winning teams in straight up fashion, a deeper look-see reveals that 3 of the Ravens 5 losses against winning teams took place on the road...

...the Ravens lost 20-23 at Pittsburgh, lost 3-31 at Indianapolis, and lost 10-30 at the Giants, Baltimore's other two losses occurred at home against Pittsburgh and Tennessee, the common denominator is that the Ravens lost to Indianapolis and also lost TWICE to Pittsburgh...

...its generally not a good idea to compare apples to oranges, however, the Ravens lost to Pittsburgh TWICE while the Titans blew Pittsburgh out by the final score of 31-14 and they did it when something was on the line (the #1 seed in the AFC), the Titans also defeated the same Colts team by 10 points that slaughtered Baltimore by 28 points.

Once again I enjoyed your write up but felt the other side of the tape had to be told as a means of being fair and balanced...

Take care and be well my friend

Dirtydog

:wink:
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Thanks, BG. To also throw my 2 cent into the fountain...

I have ARI with the 8th best run defense, and 14th best pass defense, hence a better run defense than pass defense.

Cruncher,
I have the Cards as having a better run defense than pass defense but rank both units of theirs worse than you have them. I feel the Panthers running game is better than their passing game, and more importantly how they match up agianst the Cardinals, I value their running game as having more success than when they decide to pass. Nonetheless, they have the advantage in both facets.
Best of luck this week.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
I will provide a write-up and pick on the Chargers/Steelers game some time tommorrow.


Eagles @ Giants
Play: Over 38
Comment:
Pros:
Value:
Giant Misperception:
There is no denying that the Giants have tailed off late in the season and are not as good of a team compared to the level they were playing at during the first half of the season. A lot has been blamed on the off field distractions and injuries to key offensive players that have made the Giants a less potent team. Although such a notion holds some merit, it is overblown and not addressing the true crux of their problem, which has been the regression of their defense. The Giants defense has been getting progressively worse and has shown some leaks in facets that not only can be attacked by the Eagles offensive strengths, but are leaks that are very Over friendly. Unlike their offense whose had had their fair share of injuries, including Jacobs who was hurt during their slight offensive regression, their defense has not been battling injuries. My evaluation early in the season that showed the Giants defense playing well above their talent level is has shown signs of being true. In a nutshell, this means that the Giants defense, and not their offense (due to getting healthier) that is likely to continue to regress.

Weather creating value on the Over:
Once again, weather bid down a line that already factored in unfavorable weather conditions. The line has moved a couple of points off the open and can continue to get bid down until game time. However, the weather effect is immaterial at best, and can actually help out the Over. Not only are both teams accustomed to such weather, the wind, which is the most vital weather variable is will not have much of an effect if any. This means both teams passing games will not be comprised. The semi-slop field conditions may favor the offenses, as both defenses have the propensity to over pursue and may have a hard time making cuts to counter.

Fundamentals favoring the Offense:
The Eagles offense is getting progressively better as McNaab starts to find his groove. It is also a an offense that knows the Giants defense inside and out, and played very well against them in both games this season when the Giants defense was playing better and the Eagles offense was out of sync. The main facet in which the Giants defense has been struggling of late is their linebacker coverage. This makes them especially vulnerable when facing teams that use the running back and tight ends well in the passing game. Enter the Eagles, who can really exploit this leak. The Giants on an aggregate has been slumping defend the first and third level passing game as well. This also bodes well for the Eagles, who rely a lot on the first level passing game to open up the third level. What the Giants defense has not been struggling defending during their slide has been the run. This should only encourage a pass happy offense and offense that likes to use an up tempo style to be heavily dependent on such. Another Over friendly variable. What I am expecting out of the Eagles is a lot of passes. They should continue to have some decent success against this Giants defense, which should result in some scoring drives that are not clock demanding and three and outs that aren’t either.

The Giants actually hands down possess the better offense in this game. Although they miss Burress a lot, probably not as much as most people think. The third level passing game has not faltered terribly much since his departure, and some of the regression in that facet has been to be connected to the good third level pass defenses that they have faced in the last couple of months. The Giants offense prides themselves on wearing down the opposing defense. The Eagles defense just got through playing three straight very physical games that demanded a lot of energy. The Giants offense is very well rested. Put these two together, and I like the Giants chances of wearing down this undersized defense. This should lead to a nice embedded advantage late in the game for their offense. Manning can handle the blitz and is familiar with the complexity of the Eagles blitzing scheme, a huge advantage the Eagles defense has against most teams. Their ability to run the ball well also should limit the Eagles blitzes and also open up the Giants passing game. The Giants red zone offense has many weapons and should be able to finish off their better drives. Yes, the Eagles defense is very good. However, they are also probably very tired, not something you want to be against a bruising offense. The result should be a performance below their par.

Conclusion:
Both offenses are just too good to accompany a total in the 30’s. The Eagles offense is upward trending and facing a downward trending defense. The Giants offense is not regressing as most people think and face a tired defense. Both offenses in my opinion, have a good chance of getting and surpassing the 20 point mark, which should send this total Over.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
1,140
Tokens
buffet - great w-ups - but have you ever been to Giants stadium?

that wind swirls...


gl today
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Chargers @ Steelers
Play: Over 37.5
Comment:
Pros:
Under Tendencies overcompensated:
Weather: Once again, the total opened up low compensating for the expected bad weather. Once again, the marketplace bid a low total down because the “effect” the weather will have on the game. However, once again, public expectations call for a more material effect from the weather than what will probably come to fruition. The turf may be a bit sloppy and field goals are always hard to kick in this stadium. But this has always been the case here. It is also a stadium that has a very high Over rate. The most important weather variable for the total, wind, is immaterial today.

Tomlinson: Many think the Chargers offense will be hurt with his absence, as he is construed as the Chargers best offensive weapon. That is simply not the case this year. The transfer from him to predominately Sproles (and Bennett) are also an Over friendly variable. Why? The other two running backs have a higher variance, which means the provide more big play ability and also provide a lot more inefficient runs. The outcome will likely result in quicker scoring drives, quicker drives that are backed by punts, and a less likelihood of grinding out yards. Sproles is not durable, especially against a hard hitting team like the Steelers. This also leads me to believe the Chargers will have to rely more heavily on the passing game. In my opinion, Tomlinson’s absence is to the Overs advantage.

Last meeting between these two teams: The first meeting got a lot of attention. It is also well known for its low scoring affair. Did it influence the total of this game. The total in that game closed three points higher than this games current market price. These three points are also big points, as they pass through a couple of key numbers. Since their first meeting, both offenses have gotten material better. Also, the score in that game is not only unsustainable, but also a bit misleading. Ben picked apart the Chargers, and Parker had no problem running the ball. Sproles wasn’t used, and the Chargers offensive line was more injured and playing at a much lower level. It is hard to imagine that the first meetings score didn’t lower the market price of today’s game.

Fundamentals:
The Steelers have a top tier defense. The only better defense in the league may be the Ravens, assuming the Ravens do in fact have the better defense. Having said that, taking the Over with the a defense like the Steelers is not necessarily a bad thing. The Steelers defense creates a lot of mistakes that can allow them to score or set up easy drives for their offense. Picking off Rivers twice and creating a fumble and a safety didn’t lead to a lot of points when they first played, but I welcome such an effect when taking the Over. The Steelers blitzing and man coverage also encourages a lot of deep passes that Rivers was unable to do against the Cover 2 last week. Expect Rivers to attack the third level of the Steelers defense early and often as they know it will be difficult to grind out yards against them. Whether successful or not, this is good for the Over. So is having Sproles as the running back. Expect his big play ability to be Over Friendly. Also expect the Chargers to implement the short passing game to compensate for their inability to use a lot or running plays with him. Also Over friendly. The Chargers offense is one of the best and hottest in the league. They are hard to stop right now and will create some problems for even a Steelers defense. Holding them down to what the market price is susgesting, about 15 points, is a tough task if you ask me.

The Chargers defense has improved, but still has a lot of question marks. The Steelers offense has also improved, and probably at a faster rate than the Chargers defense. Both their running game and passing game has witnessed increased productivity. The Steelers used a lot of spread formation against the Chargers that encouraged a heavy dose of passing. Expect the same today. Ward is primed for another big game, as his lining up in the slot will draw nickel coverage against him that he can exploit. The Chargers as still vulnerable against the run and the pass, which bodes well for an offense that has been steadily improving in both facets. The Steelers should be able to move the ball as well as they did against the Steelers in their first meeting. The biggest difference will more than likely be their improved ability to finish off drives. Last meeting, their three red zone trips lead to six points. They were without their best red zone threat, Miller. That is not the case this week. The Chargers are vulnerable against tight ends as well. Again, the market is suggesting not a lot of points from the Steelers. Being helped by their defense, I see them putting up something well into the 20’s, and possibly more.

Conclusion:
Two of the hotter offenses in the league rarely accompany a total set this low. Too many overcompensated variables are influencing downward pressure on the total, thus creating value on the Over. I will take this Over.
 

UF. Champion U.
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
12,281
Tokens
Why? The other two running backs have a higher variance, which means the provide more big play ability and also provide a lot more inefficient runs. The outcome will likely result in quicker scoring drives, quicker drives that are backed by punts, and a less likelihood of grinding out yards. Sproles is not durable, especially against a hard hitting team like the Steelers. This also leads me to believe the Chargers will have to rely more heavily on the passing game. In my opinion, Tomlinson’s absence is to the Overs advantage.

buffett,

This is something I have been trying to put into words for such a long time and you hit the nail on the head with the simple word of variance.

I haven't even read the rest of your writeup but I love this concept, and had to respond as I have been utilizing it for years, just haven't found the way to word it.

Thanks, and as always good writeups.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
I will post my AFC play later today.


Eagles @ Cardinals
Play: Under 47
Comment:
Pros:
Faulty Expectations: Looks like oddsmakers thought market perception would be skewed by the 68 total points scored when these teams first met in November. The line opened 2.5 points higher than the current market price, as too much stock may have been put forth in not only that game but the reputations of both teams that have structurally changed of late. Firstly, the first meeting is misleading. The Cardinals were coming off a much anticipated and emotion home game against the Giants in which they were worn down. They had to travel across country to play on three days rest against a desperate offense that had to make a statement. A high rate of passes, an up tempo style from both offenses, and turnovers that favored the Over all had their role to prop up the score in that game. Expecting the same may be wishful thinking. Secondly, perception is both teams pass more than any other team in football. Although true, there is no denying that the Cardinals and Eagles have both been more committed to the running game, and will probably have to stay committed to the running game, as they are up against defenses that can really pressure the quarterback if offenses implement a one dimensional passing attack. Expectations may not come to fruition like the total is suggesting.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p> </o:p>
Fundamentals: I have said it before and will say it again, the Eagles possess the best defense in the NFC. They also possess all the tangibles to counter the strengths of the Cardinals offense. The Eagles have the depth and talent at the cornerback spot to counter the depth and talent the Cardinals receivers possess. This will take away the embedded advantage Warner has been accustomed to that has masked his true worth and has made him appear better than he really is. Fitzgerald during their first meeting was up against the Eagles worst corner Shepard. His production was still limited. With the injury to Boldin, expect the Eagles to have increased leverage in containing Fitzgerald again, by either doubling him or putting their best corner on him throughout most of the game. The Eagles ability to force mistakes should encourage the Cardinals to be more conservative in the passing game. So should their ability to pressure the quarterback. The Eagles ability to increase productivity when facing one dimensional offenses should also encourage the Cardinals to once again be more committed to the running game.
<o:p> </o:p>
The Cardinals defense is playing really well of late and always plays with increased intensity at home. The Eagles offense has not played nearly as well as their defense, and with the injury to Westbrook they should once again find it hard to put forth a dominating attack. His injury and limited production should force McNaab into less favorable positions, take away a huge passing threat, and make a power running attack lead by Buckhalter more of a staple in their game plan. The increased workload shifting to Westbrook to Buckhalter also leads to a reduction of variance, thus implying a lot less one yard and 20 plus yard gain that are detrimental to the Under, and will be replaced with a lot more 3 to 5 yard plays. The Cardinals biggest weakness is their third level pass defense. Their aggressive corners are vulnerable against the deep pass. However, the Eagles have taken a lot less chances down the field this year, and their productivity in this facet is also way down.
<o:p> </o:p>
Conclusion:
A game with this magnitude should lead to both teams feeling each other out and waiting for someone to make a mistake first. This type of tempo is not ideal for such a high total. Both teams will probably run more than anticipated, while both passing games will find it hard to put forth a dominating attack. The result should be a game finishing Under the posted total.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Ravens @ Steelers
Play: Ravens +6
Comments:
Pros:
Value: If there ever was a game that will possess utmost intensity and physicality that will make every yard and point hard to come by, this is the game. Games such as these will make points magnified, thus six points in actuality are more valuable than what appears on paper. Both teams know each other well, and only seven points separated the two in their first two meetings combined. Again, in actuality, the competition and actual closeness of the game even closer than the aggregate seven points would suggest. The Steelers are not the typical team you want to back when having to have them win by seven or more points against quality teams. During the regular season, they played seven teams that made the playoffs. They lost four of those games. Of the three that they won, the games were decided by three, one, and four points respectively. Not only have the Ravens gotten better compared to the first two meetings against the Steelers, but when having a rookie quarterback, the experience gained from those two games by Flacco is a material intangible, and the embedded advantage that the Steelers have against most young quarterbacks is less consequential in this game compared to the first two.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p> </o:p>
Fundamentals: The Steelers defense is only second to the Ravens. However, the Ravens are not a team that heavily relies on their offense to win games. They have been relying on their defense and special teams to make big plays and set up their offense with favorable drives and easy points. With that in mind, the Ravens will not be forced to alter their offense by having to face the best defense that they can possibly face. Expect them to continue to use a heavy dose of running that will set up Flacco with a lot more manageable passing situations. The strong arm of Flacco can also come in handy this game, as his receivers will be up against a lot of man coverage and stacked boxes. The Ravens offensive line has materially improved of late. This should increase their chances of implementing an effective running game. The second meeting, the Ravens employed their unbalanced line that opened things up for their running game and limited the production of <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place>Harrison</st1:place>. Expect more of the same Sunday. Although I am not expecting the Ravens offense to put forth a dominant performance, I don’t need such when being backed by their offense and the six points.
<o:p> </o:p>
It is quite apparent that the Steelers have their difficulties running the ball against the Ravens. Their running game was shut down during their first two meetings against them this year, and during the last three seasons, have only managed two and a half yards per carry against them. This means that the onus will be on Ben to win this game by a sizeable margin, nothing something I would want to back my money with. Although the Steelers line has improved, they still are a weakness and should be outmatched by the Ravens pass rush. Although Ben improvised with this weakness during the first two meeting with his scrambling ability, such plays lack sustainability and consistency. Expect the Steelers passing game to run into droughts and have a difficult time sustaining drives. The result should be a hard time finding the endzone throughout this game.
<o:p> </o:p>
Conclusion: Yes, the Ravens are tired, lack the ideal experience, and have some key injuries on defense. However, I feel such cons are fully reflected into the line, and then some. The Steelers are not built to blow good teams out, and with the way the Ravens have been playing of late, they appear incredibly hard to beat by seven or more. This game, much like the first two will be close. I will take the points in this one.
 

FOOTBALL FORECASTOR
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
578
Tokens
The Steelers are not the typical team you want to back when having to have them win by seven or more points against quality teams. During the regular season, they played seven teams that made the playoffs. They lost four of those games. Of the three that they won, the games were decided by three, one, and four points respectively.
:howdy:

Hello buffettgambler...

Thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts on the upcoming games as I enjoy reading your postings as they are usually pretty well thought out and insightful...

...however, the case you made against Pittsburgh with regard to who they played this year and which games they lost and to which teams they lost to could in fact be used against the Ravens as well.

A peek at Baltimore's schedule and their results shows that the Ravens lost five games this year with each and every loss to a playoff bound team (including two losses to Pittsburgh)...

...three of the Ravens five losses occurred on the road and 2 of the 3 losses were BLOWOUT losses to the Colts (3-31) and to the Giants by the final of 10-30, the Ravens also lost to Pittsburgh on the road in OT 20-23 however the Ravens were actually down 17-3 in that game.

Meaning that a case could be made that:

A.) Baltimore is playing a playoff team and each Raven loss was against a playoff team...

B.) Three of the Ravens five seasonal losses occurred on the road and they are on the road this week...

C.) Two of the Ravens three road losses were by 28 and 20 points...

Using the above data we could easily conclude that the Ravens will likely get blown out this week, will that happen?

Needless to say we don't know for sure who will win and by how many points, however, this much we do know and that is the fact that the Ravens are a beat up bunch that is playing their 18th straight game without rest and have a rookie QB leading them into battle.

I believe you are correct in your assessment of the NFC Championship game with regard to the UNDER, I lean to the UNDER as well, however, the O/U number on the game (47) is now a stale number as it opened up at 49.5 and has been bet downward to 47, meaning that the value on that play has already been sucked out of it.

Once again nice job on your written analysis, its always a joy to read the work of someone who obviously researches what they write and is able to put their thoughts into a clear and coherent format.

Take care and be well my friend...

Dirtydog

:wink:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
If the public and everyone else feels that this will be a close game, WHY did the oddsmaker make the line -6? Do you think he doesn't know what he's doing. Pitts big time.And that's from a Giants fan.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
1,349
Tokens
hey buffet, how did you do in the bases this season? i know you're one of the best mlb cappers around. looked for your posts all season long!!!
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
If the public and everyone else feels that this will be a close game, WHY did the oddsmaker make the line -6? Do you think he doesn't know what he's doing. Pitts big time.And that's from a Giants fan.

It's not about trying to figure out whether "he" knows what he is doing. Firstly, oddsmakers opened it after the Steelers/Chargers game at 5, not 6. And prior to the Steelers/Chargers game the oddsmakers at some offshores were posting the Ravens/Steelers line at -3. This is market players overreacting to what transpired in the Steelers/Chargers game and the injuries to the Ravens defense that is getting much more attention that what it would be getting if there were 15 other games being played this week like during the regular season.

As a handicapper, my role is to try to find mispricings, not figure out what oddsmakers know or not know. In my opinion, the oddsmakers were right with their initial value of this game of 3. The market participants during the week I feel have overreacted.

If in fact the oddsmakers did open up the line at six, I wouldn't know why. But I didn't know why they opened the Panthers at 9.5 or the Giants at 4 last week either.

Best of luck this week.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,917
Messages
13,575,193
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com