True and why pointing things out that are factual isn't racist.
One can state their opinions without the part about killing ppl.
Dense? you want dense? You blame the latest attacks on a "white nationalist". I think the latest attacks, THAT WOULD BE TODAY's SEVEN CHRISTIAN CHURCH BOMBINGS, are unlikely to have been committed by Christians
You want Dense II? You justify the senseless bombings by calling it retaliation against the actions of a "white nationalists". I correctly pointed out how dense your arguments are since the religion of peace has carried out 35,000 senseless attacks in 18 years
You represent your ilk well
Vlad tends to go too far
So let's get opinions.
What if someone said:
"The world would be a better place and every other race in it much safer if Muslims ceased to exist"
Would that be racist vs "The world would be a better place and every other race in it much safer if all Muslims were killed/annihilated"??
What if someone said:
"The world would be a better place and every other race in it much safer if Muslims ceased to exist"
Would that be racist vs "The world would be a better place and every other race in it much safer if all Muslims were killed/annihilated"??
I just think he's one of those people who's had enough and speaks his mind.
He sees what other European countries are now going through by allowing certain ppl into their homeland and doesn't want it to happen here.
We all know you cannot speak too freely these days.
Hopefully he'll change his style a bit.
No I'm not saying anything.
I'm simply asking would the first sentence be considered racist vs the 2nd?
How do you truly differentiate an opinion from actually being racist?
Is it based only on words?
Is an opinion or fact racist or does the person basically have to flat out say "I hate this ethnicity"?
I find it interesting and curious what others think.
What are you talking about??
This is a conversation and I'm asking how others feel.
The subject is complicated in my opinion.
Saying the world would be a better place without Muslims in it wouldn’t be racist. But it’s a bigoted statement for sure. People kill each other in the name of nearly every religion on this planet. It’s a sad reality. But events like what happen today spurn others to think about retribution. It’s an endless cycle. And allowing Vlad to be a complete fucking maniac over and over doesn’t help things. It actually makes divisions worse
Everyone has already agree with you that he goes too far.
The examples I used and questions aren't about him only, but the subject in general.
Marge....
My wife, her 9 brothers and sisters, and her mom & dad are all Hispanic/Mexican-American.
But they don't like Illegal Mexicans at all because they think they give the rest of them a black eye.
Are they racist?
My wife, her 9 brothers and sisters, and her mom & dad are all Hispanic/Mexican-American.
But they don't like Illegal Mexicans at all because they think they give the rest of them a black eye.
Are they racist?
No, the problem is that you mods keep saying he goes too far, but nothing is ever done to him. Every other day it’s the same shit with him. What’s the point of infractions/rules if you don’t use them. He’s literally the biggest racist/bigot here, and has been for 15 consistent years. Is there a benefit to keeping him as a member beyond inflaming others? I’m all for free speech, but he uses HATE SPEECH
The world would be a better place if the truly peaceful Muslims on earth took control and stamped out their radical elements
They tend to allow it. Not saying they condone it, but they allow it.
For being one of the "birthplaces" of civilization, and given all their modern day natural wealth, how can their entire region be dysfunctional, oppressive and violent "shitholes"? I'll never understand that one
You sound like 1-2 other posters here who say we don't do anything.
How do you know that?
Are you 100% certain action hasn't been taken??
Maybe he'll tell you when he posts.
