2 Friday w/analysis

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
RangeWLP+/- (Units)
Yesterday310.00+5.00
Last 30 Days14180.00-2.96
Season to Date14180.00-2.96

Boston is for 2 units. Detroit is 2.04 units to win 2

Detroit -102 over CALGARY

OT included. After the Oilers defeated Detroit on Wednesday night, the TSN panel talked about the difference between this year’s Oilers and last year’s edition. The all had something to say. They talked about Edmonton being more responsible defensively and they talked about Connor McDavid’s impact. That’s not all they said and they showed examples on the screen of what they were talking about. After every loss last season, that same panel talked about the Oilers sloppy habits. It’s all fluff. The difference is goaltending. Period. Had Ben Scrivens been in net again for Edmonton this season, the Oilers would have likely been down a couple of goals and been chasing each game just like were last year. Poor goaltending impacts everyone. It impacts the coach, the offense, the defense and the collective state of mind of the entire group. Edmonton is winning games because they’re getting great goaltending from Cam Talbot. It gives everyone a boost and it also gives them confidence. Had the Oilers stuck with Scrivens and Viktor Fasth this year, that same panel would be talking about the Oilers sloppy habits.

Last year Jeremy Roenick suggested on an NBC telecast that Wild Coach Mike Yeo should be fired. He went on to say that it’s time for the team and Yeo to part ways after Minnesota was losing almost every night. The Wild subsequently picked up Devan Dubnyk and Mike Yeo instantly turned into a great coach again. The point is that you cannot win in this league with wretched goaltending and that’s the problem with Calgary. It’s not coaching, nor is it a lack of offense or anything else. It’s weak goaltending that affects every player on the team. It’s demoralizing to see those soft goals go in every single game. Last year, the Flames were able to overcome it because they had a slew of late rallies and they were scoring on a high percentage of their shots. This year they are not doing either and that means they’re fighting an uphill battle every night. Baseball lines are set based on the starting pitchers due to the impact the starter has on the outcome. Hockey does not employ that same criterion to starting goalies because so many of them are about equal and none of them throw a curve ball or heater. However, when an inferior set of goalies that do not belong at this level and are playing every night for a certain team, we can take advantage of the oddsmakers not considering it when posting the line. Jonas Hiller is inadequate and he is worse than backup Karri Ramo, who was put on waivers this week but was not picked up. Until Calgary addresses this, we are attacking them when the price allows us to. The price allows us to here.

Boston +155 over N.Y. ISLANDERS
OT included. After losing their first two games of the year, both to Chicago, the Islanders have reeled off four straight wins while outscoring the opposition 18-8 over that span. As a result, the Islanders stock is moving up but we’re not buying any. You see, the Islanders dead last (tied with Ottawa) for the most shots allowed per game. That means a lot of running around in its own end. When the Islanders defeated the Blue Jackets on Tuesday, they were outshot by Columbus, 39-27. In the Isles recent 4-3 victory over Nashville, they were outshot 47-28. In their six games so far, the Islanders have had one dominant performance, which occurred against Winnipeg. No question that the Islanders can score goals. They roll out two dangerous scoring lines, a third line that is not as prolific but can still contribute regularly and a fourth line that is widely considered to be the best in the game. However, they are still vulnerable to falling behind and having to rally. That’s risky business when spotting prices like this.

The Bruins are 2-4. They have allowed five goals or more in three of those six games. We’re not sure why Tuukka Rask is struggling so much but it probably has something to do with a lack of confidence right now. It’s not going to deter us from playing the B’s because Rask could get hot at any time and Boston is undervalued. We have watched the Bruins dominate more games than the Islanders. In three of its last four games, Boston has held the opposition to 23 shots on goal or less. That includes Tampa Bay and Colorado. The Bruins have played one poor game this year out of six. The only reason they are not 4-2 or 5-1 is because of the unexplainable struggles of Rask. Boston is playing much better than their record indicates. All they need is one of the best goaltenders in the league over the previous three years to snap out of it. We’re willing to take that gamble when being offered a tag.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
5,745
Tokens
Funny one of my friends,who is a real hockey freak, told me at the start of the year taht he tought Rask was the most overvalued goalie in the nhl and that we'd seeit this year with Boston not having a very strong defence (Losing some key guys, Chara getting older,etc.). I can't really say he was wrong so far
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
Funny one of my friends,who is a real hockey freak, told me at the start of the year taht he tought Rask was the most overvalued goalie in the nhl and that we'd see it this year with Boston not having a very strong defence (Losing some key guys, Chara getting older,etc.). I can't really say he was wrong so far

He was right about it that Guil. I think we all have players or goalies like that, which the world thinks is good and we do not.
Mine is Pekka Rinne and.or Ben Bishop. I think Rinne is so over-rated and Bishop is just a slow, lucky stiff that is so big he covers a lot of the net.

Anyone else?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
917
Tokens
He was right about it that Guil. I think we all have players or goalies like that, which the world thinks is good and we do not.
Mine is Pekka Rinne and.or Ben Bishop. I think Rinne is so over-rated and Bishop is just a slow, lucky stiff that is so big he covers a lot of the net.

Anyone else?

I don't agree with that at all, Rask is very good he's just in a mechanical or mental funk right now. He will break out of it.
 

I don't know enough to know I don't know
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
12,487
Tokens
Excellent post Sherwood. Especially like your take on the Detroit/Calgary game. I’ll probably be tailing you on this one.

Quick rebuttal regarding the Islanders and shots against. That Cbus game was skewed for a couple reasons. Jackets went into the third period trailing and outshot New York 12-5. They also pulled their goalie with over 4 minutes left, (down 3-0).

The only other game they were badly outshot was against Nashville. I guess they deserve a pass on one game. Especially since they won it.

gl tonight
 

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
5,745
Tokens
He was right about it that Guil. I think we all have players or goalies like that, which the world thinks is good and we do not.
Mine is Pekka Rinne and.or Ben Bishop. I think Rinne is so over-rated and Bishop is just a slow, lucky stiff that is so big he covers a lot of the net.

Anyone else?

Everyone that Tavares ever played with? You can even go the other way around, Goalies that you think are way better then everyone thinks. Luongo comes to mind instantly. He's played for Florida earlier in his carreer when they were aweful. Then he gets traded to Vancouver and I tought he was fine there especially under all the management bs.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
917
Tokens
Nice hit on the B's, I think it really was for the best that Rask didn't start.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,945
Messages
13,575,475
Members
100,885
Latest member
333wincloud
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com