Norega: There is the game within the game. I play for middles. That's three early bets, ( two published), BOUGHT BACK ON TWO OF THEM, I'm at 5 bets.
I play almost every halftime dog of +200 or better on ML, testing it out for smaller bets, it's done well so far, ( went 0-3 with +535, +205, + 650 bets) ,I'm at 8 bets.
I played 10 half-time bets ( other than ML's), total bets now equals 18. Some being totals, some sides, I could have more than that by betting props, quarters, first halves ,etc.
I pass on some very slight positive bets. Stuff like +3 +100, -2 -110, has a small value ( in theory). It's arguable, but borderline bettable. I can make many bets on one game. That +3 even/ -2 -110 really should draw a bet in NBA. Make that -2 into -108, -107, -105, if you don't bet it , you leave money on the table ( at least in theory). I'll bet anything if I think I have an edge. Furthurmore if you don't like that spread, then you must love one team to win the game !
Was I wrong to take Phil -6 -110, and Dallas +7.5 -105 on MNF ? I don't think so !
There are different approaches to this endeavor, maybe mine doesn't match yours, but I'm not necessarily a " a bookie's dream".
Remember the "game within a game". On the surface you are correct, but some of us dive deeper.