11-07-02 NHL LOCKS

Search
a "nice" 1-1-1 day - for a grand total of -1.80 units.

i have no problem with the bruins play (i had them, too, and in reality they should have won) or the coyotes play.

BUTTTTTTTTTTTTT

didn't you learn your lesson the other day when you had NJ -275 and they LOST.

it is nice of you to post picks here - but NO ONE in their right mind EVER lays -280 on ANY game. i think we saw why today.

simply put - by laying this much wood you are basically doomed to fail - and from seeing what loser picks you have made in the past - i sense you already know that.

feel free to keep posting your picks in any sport - but if you think even ONE PERSON is following your picks you must have played catcher for randy johnson without a cup or face mask. we really enjoy your picks for it gives us something solid to FADE! nothing more.

keep up the good work, seinfeld - i mean "crock line".
 
something catcher's wear to make sure the family jewels are functional if they get hit there. actually - for someone like me - it would be more like a bowl /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
 
[Posted by Winkyduck]

NO ONE in their right mind EVER lays -280 on ANY game. i think we saw why today.

______________________

I couldn't disagree with you any more. What if a game is -280 here in this contest, and the line goes to -340/+280, as in today's case in San Jose. Are you saying it's silly to bet that fav at -280. Laying -280 in this game would be like being the bookie and booking all dog action at +280. And i don't think any book will turn down this bet.

There are times when laying 280 is a good move.
 
to vega: congrats!

to wd: during gym class in HS i left my family jewels in locker and someone stole them!

to SG: the ONLY time playing pk -280 would be smart would be getting off/hedging a series/futures bet.

to myself: how about that 'under-taker'!

bb
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
57
Tokens
At least somebody has some sense. The guys who moan about it have consistantly been losers in sports betting all their life. They are running scared and have no balls. They are the same people who consistantly bet the Randy Johnsons, Schillings ect on the run line. But they dont realise run lines are sucker bets.
 
What is your hockey record? Please tell me your not comparing run lines to puck lines. Your balls must be huge to blow 280 on a fav. BTW how sore are those big balls of yours.


Sick
Thank god for the Ragnarsson goal.
 
Yes, I'll admit it, thank God for Magnus. But I had to play that game. Even though I was cursing throughout the whole game, and was very lucky to pull out a tie. But I had to play it. The game went to -350 in some places, and laying only 275 here was a steal.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
63
Tokens
Anyone who lays -280 for real cash, using a real bankroll, is a damn fool. I don't care if the line goes to -400. So what? Doing it in a contest is one thing, but if you're doing it for real cash, especially in the NHL, you need a serious reality check.
 
i'll challenge you to a 1-on-1 competition anytime. say the word and let's go for it. i'll whup your ass when all is said and done!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,945
Messages
13,575,473
Members
100,885
Latest member
333wincloud
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com