1 Tuesday w/analysis

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
RangeWLP+/- (Units)
Yesterday000.000.00
Last 30 Days740.00+5.58
Season to Date1040.00+11.58

WAKE FOREST +7½ -106 over Xavier
7:00 PM EST. The Musketeers are definitely a legit team but they lost Dee Davis and Matt Stainbrook from last year's Sweet-16 team. As a senior, Davis dished out six assists per game and committed a mere 2.4 turnovers. Matt Stainbrook was the massive inside presence for Xavier, who averaged a team high 12.3 points and 6.9 rebounds during his senior season. One cannot talk about Xavier without mentioning NBA prospect Trevon Bluiett, a 6-6 sophomore guard. Bluiett is the star of this team but he still has a ways to go before he’ll excel at being the QB of this offense like Davis was.

There is always a price to pay when backing highly-rated undefeated teams, which applies here to the Musketeers. Xavier comes in with an 11-0 record. They’re ranked #6 in the country but they were not ranked in the preseason polls whatsoever. Only after the Musketeers defeated then #24 Michigan by 16 points a month ago did they appear in the polls. Eight wins later and Xavier has moved all the way up to a #6 ranking. What we’ve learned since is that the Wolverines are not all that. Michigan has played three legit teams (Xavier, UConn and SMU) and they’re 0-3 in those games. Xavier has played one true road game this season, which happens to be that aforementioned, not as impressive as it seemed at the time, victory over Michigan. The Musketeers have put up a lot of crooked numbers in a slew of blowout victories but most of those were against cupcakes and all of them were at home. Now Xavier’s stock is through the roof, which makes us sellers here.

Wake Forest did not have too many good moments to build on during Coach Danny Manning’s first season with the team. The Demon Deacons went just 5-13 in ACC play and there were only a couple quality wins over North Carolina State and Miami to hang their hat on. This season, however, as a 12½-point pooch against then #23 Indiana on November 23, Wake won outright by four points. The very next night against #19 Vanderbilt, as an 11-point dog, Wake was whacked by 18. Since covering against the Hoosiers seven games ago, the Demon Deacons have just one cover since. Combine that with last year’s poor record and Wake’s market appeal is not very high at the moment. That makes us buyers. Wake has won five in a row over UCLA, Rutgers, Arkansas, UNC Greensboro and Coastal Carolina. Three games ago, the Deacs welcomed back senior guard Codi Miller-McIntyre, who was the team’s leading scorer a year ago, but missed the first eight games with a foot injury. In games decided by five points or less, the Deacs are 5-0. They’re also 4-1 at home, 2-0 on the road and 8-2 overall. This is a Wake team with good ball handlers and plenty of scorers. They only lost one starter from a year ago and it’s a rather insignificant one. The Deacs need to improve on defense, which was a sore spot last year as well but they can trade punches with anyone and they figure to be profitable when taking back significant home points. The buy-low/sell-high angle comes into play here. These are inflated points. Pick: Wake -7½ Risking 2.12 units to win 2).
 

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
53,741
Tokens
S/wood...........BOL with todays action.........you and your family have a great Holiday...........indy
 

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
827
Tokens
Sherwood......... as always a through, concise, informative and well researched write-up showing and proving that you continue to do your due diligence. GLTU. Thanks.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
Thanks Indy and Hilltop, much appreciated. Best of luck to you both too.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
1,315
Tokens
RangeWLP+/- (Units)
Yesterday000.000.00
Last 30 Days740.00+5.58
Season to Date1040.00+11.58

WAKE FOREST +7½ -106 over Xavier
7:00 PM EST. The Musketeers are definitely a legit team but they lost Dee Davis and Matt Stainbrook from last year's Sweet-16 team. As a senior, Davis dished out six assists per game and committed a mere 2.4 turnovers. Matt Stainbrook was the massive inside presence for Xavier, who averaged a team high 12.3 points and 6.9 rebounds during his senior season. One cannot talk about Xavier without mentioning NBA prospect Trevon Bluiett, a 6-6 sophomore guard. Bluiett is the star of this team but he still has a ways to go before he’ll excel at being the QB of this offense like Davis was.

There is always a price to pay when backing highly-rated undefeated teams, which applies here to the Musketeers. Xavier comes in with an 11-0 record. They’re ranked #6 in the country but they were not ranked in the preseason polls whatsoever. Only after the Musketeers defeated then #24 Michigan by 16 points a month ago did they appear in the polls. Eight wins later and Xavier has moved all the way up to a #6 ranking. What we’ve learned since is that the Wolverines are not all that. Michigan has played three legit teams (Xavier, UConn and SMU) and they’re 0-3 in those games. Xavier has played one true road game this season, which happens to be that aforementioned, not as impressive as it seemed at the time, victory over Michigan. The Musketeers have put up a lot of crooked numbers in a slew of blowout victories but most of those were against cupcakes and all of them were at home. Now Xavier’s stock is through the roof, which makes us sellers here.

Wake Forest did not have too many good moments to build on during Coach Danny Manning’s first season with the team. The Demon Deacons went just 5-13 in ACC play and there were only a couple quality wins over North Carolina State and Miami to hang their hat on. This season, however, as a 12½-point pooch against then #23 Indiana on November 23, Wake won outright by four points. The very next night against #19 Vanderbilt, as an 11-point dog, Wake was whacked by 18. Since covering against the Hoosiers seven games ago, the Demon Deacons have just one cover since. Combine that with last year’s poor record and Wake’s market appeal is not very high at the moment. That makes us buyers. Wake has won five in a row over UCLA, Rutgers, Arkansas, UNC Greensboro and Coastal Carolina. Three games ago, the Deacs welcomed back senior guard Codi Miller-McIntyre, who was the team’s leading scorer a year ago, but missed the first eight games with a foot injury. In games decided by five points or less, the Deacs are 5-0. They’re also 4-1 at home, 2-0 on the road and 8-2 overall. This is a Wake team with good ball handlers and plenty of scorers. They only lost one starter from a year ago and it’s a rather insignificant one. The Deacs need to improve on defense, which was a sore spot last year as well but they can trade punches with anyone and they figure to be profitable when taking back significant home points. The buy-low/sell-high angle comes into play here. These are inflated points. Pick: Wake -7½ Risking 2.12 units to win 2).


Brutal 2nd half and we lose by a half point. Fricking Wake couldn't make a single basket down the stretch. Had a chance for Wake to get a garbage basket at the end and they turned the ball over to end the game.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
2,854
Tokens
Brutal 2nd half and we lose by a half point. Fricking Wake couldn't make a single basket down the stretch. Had a chance for Wake to get a garbage basket at the end and they turned the ball over to end the game.

I like to call that second half a roy williams coaching loss. Roy Williams over the years will watch his team have a huge run put up against them with timeouts in his pocket. When you are up 15 and come out of half and wipe that lead away with a 17-2 lead, you better have at least exahust 1 time out and multiple rotations. You see this in the NBA where a elite player can single handidly stop a run like that, in college it takes a coach stopping it and setting his team up for a sure bucket. Believe, my team is obviously Arkansas and we are known for the exact same thing. Manning allowed his team to get beat by bad coaching in that second half. What makes it worse, I just got a bad beat as well by .5 a point with the memphis under by a complete bogus memphis DA going up for a layup with 10 seconds on the clock and no shot clock.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
1,315
Tokens
I like to call that second half a roy williams coaching loss. Roy Williams over the years will watch his team have a huge run put up against them with timeouts in his pocket. When you are up 15 and come out of half and wipe that lead away with a 17-2 lead, you better have at least exahust 1 time out and multiple rotations. You see this in the NBA where a elite player can single handidly stop a run like that, in college it takes a coach stopping it and setting his team up for a sure bucket. Believe, my team is obviously Arkansas and we are known for the exact same thing. Manning allowed his team to get beat by bad coaching in that second half. What makes it worse, I just got a bad beat as well by .5 a point with the memphis under by a complete bogus memphis DA going up for a layup with 10 seconds on the clock and no shot clock.


I was thinking the same thing about Manning. I couldn't believe he didn't call a time out early in the 2nd half when his team gave up a 15 point halftime lead so quickly. Sorry about the Memphis loss. One half point bad beat is more than enough for a day.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
A good habit to get into is to bet the fav at half time when the dog has the lead at the half, as long as you bet that dog beforehand. You are often working with 5-15 point middles for a legit shot of cashing a 20-1 payoff.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
2,604
Tokens
Sherwood, first off I wanted to say that I really like reading your posts. During MLB season I already looked for your posts, always some good info to find in your threads, no matter if one agrees with your pick or not, the write-up/reasoning is always sound and provides a nice point of view to use when making the decision what to bet on.

Just have one question about your last post: How do you come up with a 20-1 payoff? Imo it's more like +170 to +185, depending if you were betting -110 or -105 lines: Initial bet of 110 to win 100 on the underdog, would allow you to freeroll the 2nd half by betting the favorite in your scenario with another 100 to win 90.90 bet. So if you hit the middle, you would have risked 110 (initial bet) to win a total of 100 + 90.90, which would roughly be +270.

Best of luck with all your bets and happy holidays.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,904
Tokens
When you bet both sides your risk gets cut down to 10 bucks on two $100 bets. If the middle misses you lose 10 bucks. If the middle hits you collect $200.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
Exactly...Camy is right. For instance, last night Wake +7½ for full game. They are up 15 at half time. Second half line was Wake -9. Therefore, if Wake loses by 6 or less or wins by less than 7, we win both. We're working with a 13-point middle there. $110 bet on each to win 100 means we CANNOT lose both. Impossible, so our risk is $10 to make 200. Thus, the 20-1 shot with a 13-point middle.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
2,604
Tokens
Got it. Thanks for the explanation, guess I need some more sleep. Should have been easy enough to figure that out for myself, but for some reason this morning I just couldn't figure it out. :103631605
 

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
3,248
Tokens
Sherwood

How big a middle would you need to to go for the 20-1 shot?

Some never do some always do.

I always do but pay for it because it never hits lol
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
Sherwood

How big a middle would you need to to go for the 20-1 shot?

Some never do some always do.

I always do but pay for it because it never hits lol

Four points is the lowest I'll go. Anything above that is an automatic play for me.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,203
Tokens
Got it. Thanks for the explanation, guess I need some more sleep. Should have been easy enough to figure that out for myself, but for some reason this morning I just couldn't figure it out. :103631605

No worries Soriano and thanks for the kind words in your original post.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,561
Tokens
Good luck this year Sherwood. You are off to a nice start and should've won yesterday, but that's gambling.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,945
Messages
13,575,468
Members
100,884
Latest member
68gamebaitools
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com