Whats up with people who bet the same amount on every game

Search

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
TKE683 said:
Instead of being up huge, i'm just up a decent amount...why??
Because hitting over 60% in bases, but i must be about 25% when I increase the wager, anything can happen in any game and I have gotten torched more often than not when I put big $$$ on a game as opposed to my normal bet.

Me too. I would talk myself into loving a game. Just easier flat betting for me, and far better for me to control my money. Now if I could just get that 0-9 Wednesday night back. :nohead:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
3,188
Tokens
Fat Tony said:
So play them the same amount if you're going to win!!!!!!!

:missingte

Essentially it comes down to reducing your variance. Flat bet if variance and bigger swings don't bother you, adjust amounts if they do.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
128
Tokens
g, you made your point there, man

No, I followed Ace-Ace last year play-off, He bet more in the "investment", and less or little amount in the "action" games... what it turned out was he win big $$$ , and not same units gained based on some people doing same amount of betting but the total of $$$ come out not much..
Just my 2 cents.:toast:


gynecologist said:
Could you imagine ACE-ACE betting the same amount on every game?
No way!!!
 

A.K.A. "Thee Square"
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
403
Tokens
I flat bet every game.

Sure, I LOVE some games and merely like others, but the difference in the end, for me, is minute. And it would be very easy to talk myself into a LOVE game...

I love the idea that by betting flat I GUARANTEE a winning season if I hit 53% winners. By unit betting it would come down to how the large bets do...the others are just for action.

In the end, unit bettors are about the same as flat bettors. 1-5 unit bettors are going to have a winning season if their 4 and 5 unit games win...it really doesn't matter what their 1 and 2 unit games do, unless they hit an unreal high percentage of those. And in that case, they would have won a lot more money betting flat.

Now, a unit system that makes sense is a 5, 6, and 7 unit system. Even LOVE games don't cover better than 70% over any significant time period. Like games should cover above 50% or you shouldn't be playing it. So why would you bet 3 to 5 times more money on it than a game you like?

Having a unit system which more accurately depicts the real probability makes more sense to me. I just bet flat to make it easier and guaranteed. Either I pick winners, or I don't.



Even Ace-Ace admits he loves action and advises players that bet his picks only, to stick to his $2000 games.
 

MrJ

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
2,578
Tokens
Essentially it comes down to reducing your variance. Flat bet if variance and bigger swings don't bother you, adjust amounts if they do.

It isn't about reducing variance at all. It's about realizing that you may not be able to accurately assess the ev of individual bets. Weighted betting is for those who over the long run are reasonably accurate at judging how +ev their bets are. Most cannot do this.

But for the novice or beginning bettor I strongly caution you to stay strict to flat betting. it will teach you disicpline.

It is much harder to go on tilt if you flatbet. If you vary, your emotions can influence your betsize.

Most people should be flatbetting simply because they won't win longterm, and flatbetting will reduce their turnover so will reduce their losses.
 

J-Man Rx NFL Pick 4 Champion for 2005
Joined
Apr 20, 2001
Messages
9,231
Tokens
I guess it's just me but I really don't put all that much into betting so many units Blah, blah blah ! Pick 60 % winners and you will be in great shape. Sometimes it seems as though the wagers that I felt the best about are my only losing wagers ! Obviously I'd be lying if I tried to tell you that I always wager the exact same amount but I am in the same wager catergory more than huge variances.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2006
Messages
30,208
Tokens
kermit I heard your a good football capper. Hopefully we can put
our minds together and win some games!!! GL this season bro!!
 

J-Man Rx NFL Pick 4 Champion for 2005
Joined
Apr 20, 2001
Messages
9,231
Tokens
gynecologist said:
kermit I heard your a good football capper. Hopefully we can put
our minds together and win some games!!! GL this season bro!!
The old saying " What have you done lately " applies here ! I will sure give it my best to have another great year and I hope you do the same ! Will you be at the Bash to share some thoughts on the upcoming Pro and college football season ?:103631605 :money8:
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2006
Messages
30,208
Tokens
HELL YEAH I will be at the bash!!! I didn't know you were going!!
Cool.. It will be a good time!!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
I can't tell you how many times my 'sure thing' bets lost and my marginal bets came in like a champ. My level of conviction on a game's outcome seems to mean nothing.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
754
Tokens
A flat bettor is a huge "tell"

The best bettors vary their bet sizes.

The best bettors find lines every week that they know are wrong. They pound them.

I got Akron +21.5 vs. Penn State. Instead of a beer, you have to bet some Dom on games like that.

Note, some flat bettors do win. And most bet sizers lose. However, the best bettors vary their bet sizes. If you cannot accurately estimate which bets are going to win well over 52.4% vs. then I have to ask how the hell you can estimate which bets are going to win at any rate over 52.4%. The best bettors actually consider Kelly Criteria, estimate their edge and bad proportional to it.........and no they don't donk away their chips by saying "THIS IS A 65% PLAY, I'm going to UNLOAD", on a widely available line in a major sport.
 

THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
15,349
Tokens
This has always been a hot topic of discussion and I'm not sure of the correct answer...I can only speak form experience.

Young Days: Bets were all over the place....got my ass kicked.

Nowadays: Older, wiser, max bet is 5% of my bankroll and minimum bet just for some action is 2% of bankroll...I've done this now for 6 years and it has paid off....however if I bet the same on every game, that wouldve been profitable too.

THE BIGGEST AND HARDEST ELEMENT THOUGH IS DISCIPLINE!!!!!!
 

I'd rather be Kayak fishing
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
6,411
Tokens
A guy in the baseball forum bet 12 units on two games yesterday and lost both. Days like that make you wish you bet one unit per bet.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
Fezzik said:
The best bettors vary their bet sizes.

The best bettors find lines every week that they know are wrong. They pound them.

I got Akron +21.5 vs. Penn State. Instead of a beer, you have to bet some Dom on games like that.

Note, some flat bettors do win. And most bet sizers lose. However, the best bettors vary their bet sizes. If you cannot accurately estimate which bets are going to win well over 52.4% vs. then I have to ask how the hell you can estimate which bets are going to win at any rate over 52.4%. The best bettors actually consider Kelly Criteria, estimate their edge and bad proportional to it.........and no they don't donk away their chips by saying "THIS IS A 65% PLAY, I'm going to UNLOAD", on a widely available line in a major sport.
Terrific post.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
626
Tokens
What if just flat bet on games he is more than 75% confident with in stead of varying his bet size, reduce the frequency of his play, is it going to increase his expectation of returns?
 

I'd rather be Kayak fishing
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
6,411
Tokens
Here's a question I have. Say you have a bet at -115. Do you bet $115 to win $100 or do you just bet $100 to win $87 on that particular bet? And conversely if the line is +110 do you bet $90.9 to win $100 or bet $100 to win $110? I am having trouble deciding what is the best longtime approach.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
626
Tokens
Paddywack said:
Here's a question I have. Say you have a bet at -115. Do you bet $115 to win $100 or do you just bet $100 to win $87 on that particular bet? And conversely if the line is +110 do you bet $90.9 to win $100 or bet $100 to win $110? I am having trouble deciding what is the best longtime approach.


I didn't see to much difference between those two approaches, thought keeping the risk amount flat all the time is equilvalent to keeping the winning amount the same...
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
Paddywack said:
Here's a question I have. Say you have a bet at -115. Do you bet $115 to win $100 or do you just bet $100 to win $87 on that particular bet? And conversely if the line is +110 do you bet $90.9 to win $100 or bet $100 to win $110? I am having trouble deciding what is the best longtime approach.

There is no hard and fast rule, but for ease of recordkeeping most people I know lay for a "to win" amount on the favorite and a "lay" amount on the dog. So in the 2 situations above you would lay $115 to win $100 and bet $100 to win $110.

Any way you're comfortable with works...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,860
Messages
13,463,556
Members
99,490
Latest member
faisalaftab
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com