Never forget that in Australia they put people in "quarantine camps".
In parts of Europe police patrolled the streets checking peoples papers.
Canada , A democratically elected politician is banned from parliament because she refuses to disclose her vaccination status. People are banned from flying and boarding trains based on their medical status and guns are being outlawed.
In parts of Europe police patrolled the streets checking peoples papers.
Canada , A democratically elected politician is banned from parliament because she refuses to disclose her vaccination status. People are banned from flying and boarding trains based on their medical status and guns are being outlawed.
I have a GLK with a 50 round drum. So what’s your point? Is it the style of gun that kills you are worried about? The caliber of bullet? The magazine capacity?
Is a death not a death? Is one kid killed in school not enough? Are you worried about kids being killed by guns or are you worried about kids in a school being killed but only if it’s like 5+ and done with a AR 3 times the past 22 years? If this is about kids then what’s the solution to the other 99% of kids dying at the hand of guns that are not AR style weapons? Are you concerned about those just as much? Or is school a safe place but the playground or streets or parks or restaurants or homes just oh well that’s different. Are we equally as mad if it’s 1 kid dead via gun in a school vs 10? When 3,5,6,7 die in a school shooting by a gun Not and AR do we have the same outrage? If no then why not?
So school shootings are documented all way back to 1764. Which I find insane and I’m sure we are dealing with different variables. So are we trying to prevent school shootings or prevent the amount of deaths per shooting? Below is a list of some examples. We have AR used and not used. In 22 years we have 4 substantial shootings at schools 5 if you want to count a college. So basically 4 events in 22 years. In a country of 330 million with guns everywhere.
Let’s say this data is somewhat accurate
We average 22 gun shot victims per day 5-17
On average 5 die a day 5-17
So almost 2000 kids a year die by gun
Let’s be super fair and say only 10% is murder
That’s 200 dead
That’s 120 more in 1 year than the 4 school shootings over 22 years we are hyper focused on. One of which didn’t involve an AR.
So are we sure the political minds of the world need to keep making this left vs right gun wars and always singling out the AR weapon. Or is there something else that’s the bigger problem? Do kids deaths matter more in schools? Is it the type of gun used that matters more? Is it kids deaths in general via gun? Is it any school or just schools where an AR is used 3 times out of past 22 years?
1999 columbine 15+ dead
2007 VT 15+ dead
2012 Sandy 15+ dead
2017 Parkland 15+ dead
2022 Uvalde 15+ dead
1764 Pennsylvania 11 dead
1889 West Virginia 6 dead
California
1940 6+ dead
1976 6+ dead
1989 6+ Dead
2012 6+ dead
2013 6+ dead
Not singling California out, just one of the better data states with multiple incidents different variables same results
Eveyone knows all their stupid gimmicky gun restrictions targeting law abiding citizens are just creative end arounds the Second Amendment which ultimately leads to confiscation.
It happened in Australia when they first created a "registry", then just used that database to confiscate people's weapons. Later the same Australia had Covid camps and drones yelling at people to get back in their homes, while police were stopping innnocent civilians checking their "vax" papers.
"Shall not be infringed."
Period.
Our founders knew exactly what they were doing.
I am amused that @RalphJ ....he comes back after 1.5 years to push some LIB gun propagnda on us......
Gets fact and logic from multiple people and throws his hand up cuz nobody is buying his BS
Calls everyone a "conspiracy theorist" then takes his ball and goes home....lolol
I see that as progress
Gets fact and logic from multiple people and throws his hand up cuz nobody is buying his BS
Calls everyone a "conspiracy theorist" then takes his ball and goes home....lolol
I see that as progress
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The wording is perfectly clear, one has to be a contortionist to miss it.
Furthermore, what does a militia consist of? citizens
The founding fathers intention was to enable the people to protect themselves from tyranny. Thomas Jefferson made this perfectly clear in much of his writings, including the Virginia Constitution. Guns preserve freedom, still true to this day.
Does anybody really think criminals will obey the laws? Seriously? That's about as dumb as it comes. Take weapons away from law abiding citizens, the only people that will be armed is government and criminals.
I'm not opposed to common sense regulations. Background checks, criminal and mental health issues, and a waiting period. But the real solution is education, families, truth, and stopping all the hate mongering rhetoric practiced by our politicians and our media. They are pure scum.
I will also add that this is another bastardization of our constitution by the left. The founders clearly intended to give the federal government limited authority. But modern day liberals have taken the expression "general welfare" and changed it's meaning so that they can control everything and everyone from DC. Totally against the founders' intentions
They only read the first amendment as separation of church and state as they ignore the part about government making no laws to prevent the free exercise of religion.
They espouse legislation from the bench, also totally in opposition to the founders' design. But by appointing activist judges, they avoid the legislative process and then use their criminal, corrupt, colluding media to carry their water for them. So wrong, on so many levels
WE ARE EITHER A NATION OF LAWS, OR WE'RE NOT. PS: That's what a real conservative is all about
Furthermore, what does a militia consist of? citizens
The founding fathers intention was to enable the people to protect themselves from tyranny. Thomas Jefferson made this perfectly clear in much of his writings, including the Virginia Constitution. Guns preserve freedom, still true to this day.
Does anybody really think criminals will obey the laws? Seriously? That's about as dumb as it comes. Take weapons away from law abiding citizens, the only people that will be armed is government and criminals.
I'm not opposed to common sense regulations. Background checks, criminal and mental health issues, and a waiting period. But the real solution is education, families, truth, and stopping all the hate mongering rhetoric practiced by our politicians and our media. They are pure scum.
I will also add that this is another bastardization of our constitution by the left. The founders clearly intended to give the federal government limited authority. But modern day liberals have taken the expression "general welfare" and changed it's meaning so that they can control everything and everyone from DC. Totally against the founders' intentions
They only read the first amendment as separation of church and state as they ignore the part about government making no laws to prevent the free exercise of religion.
They espouse legislation from the bench, also totally in opposition to the founders' design. But by appointing activist judges, they avoid the legislative process and then use their criminal, corrupt, colluding media to carry their water for them. So wrong, on so many levels
WE ARE EITHER A NATION OF LAWS, OR WE'RE NOT. PS: That's what a real conservative is all about
