Im checking on langs claims -also this is gonna be a tough call either way / biggest individual plays on SF but tons of kc along with Taylor Swifts antics has ceasars casino vp says they will need sf despite futures sf liability - mgm also says same but some think calif money might bring in late Sf money -ill update
I have a very small play on SF -1.5, I am going to watch the game for entertainment.
I do not like the game gambling wise, KC looks like the logical side with the playoff results but with closer examination they played cold weather games vs two injury plagued teams (Miami & Buffalo) and then Baltimore fumbled on the 6 inch line and was intercepted in the end zone on a clear PI, though the key was how poorly overrated Lamar Jackson played. On the other hand the SF played two powerful offenses in good weather and still won, but SF DC Wilks is an incomptent fraud, and the 49ers are vulnerable on defense to Mahomes and a decent running game by KC because of him. eg. Wilks still thinks 49ers do not have to blitz.
Also I want Pfizer/Bud Light/Swift Kelce to lose, and Taylor Swift is a political tool for the Dem party, and the constant narraritve that Mahomes will be the GOAT soon is aggravating to me. Also aggravating is the 24/7/365 national narrative that Purdy is only good because of his surroungings. IMO if Balty had Purdy instead of Lamar, they beat KC two weeks ago. AND Mahomes had a lot of surroundings all those years w Hill and Kelce and some other speedy recievers, now Rice and others are finally coming along plus of course he has Kelce.
Agree, and also the books know a lot of wagers will come in for SF because of their various dislikes of KC (as I cited earlier) so they made KC more attractive with the points.
I sure thought KC would be a slight favorite. Are you sick of the constant Mahomes State Farm commerials, by the way?
