Tulsa,
I also appreciate your openness, but I see some fundamental things in which you believe that simply aren't true...
Yes, I call myself an opponent of the Jews and their current movement, a determined one at that. But no, I do not dislike them (I'm glad you didn't use the "hate" word as many of your ilk like to use), and I do not believe there is any sort of de facto conspiracy going on, nor am I the slightest bit paranoid of such a thing. The Jewish race has my utmost respect, even if I am trying to push the world in a different direction.
I do believe Hitler has been the most mischaracterized leader in the history of the world, and it is largely due to the unbelievable success of the Jews in controlling the world's media. My hat goes off to such an incredibly intelligent, creative and cohesive group (cohesive by instinct, not by conspiracy).
The achilles heel of this thus far wonderfully successful race of people is their inability to think very far ahead. They can solve the short and medium term problems with unparalleled efficiency, but they fail to provide answers for the next generations. Could it be selfishness and/or erosion of religious foundations? I don't know.
One thing is for sure, though -- the world economy is currently standing on a house of cards and it is not because of Hitler's economic ideas of self-sufficiency and goods-based (not money-based) exchange, which were neutralized by force and permanently outlawed for all major world economies with American nukes (designed by Jewish scientists) enforcing the law.
Hitler would have been happy to just oust the Soviets (and the territories they controlled) and ally himself with the Americans and the British. He respected American power and didn't want a confrontation with them. He only attacked weaker opponents whose barbaric ways were getting out of hand and he wanted evolution to continue as it has up to now, with the more intelligent and forward thinking types being successful, while crowding out the barbaric types and letting them reach an evolutionary dead end -- one that he (and I) feel is deserving.
But the Americans couldn't have that. They identified deeply with weaker and less able-bodied peoples, because deep down they felt that way themselves. They feared Hitler would regard Americans as weak, and put them next on the list to attack. This fear was nothing more than paranoia, for attacking America wasn't even in his wildest dreams, despite propaganda to the contrary.
So America took the initiative and quashed him. And where did it lead? To a world in which the weaker, dumber, more disadvantaged you are, and the more capable you are of lying, cheating and stealing, the more help you'll get from powerful governments and the more incentive you'll have to make babies, all supported by a fragile economic house of cards waiting to collapse.
It doesn't really matter, though, because in the end the values that brought human evolution to today's stage will continue to prosper, but between WW2 and WW3 we'll just have another failed experiment to look back on with fond memories as we tell stories to our 3-year-old great grandchildren in a rocking chair at the age of 95.
