Write it down. SEC will 3-peat for the NC.

[GrilledCheese]

All you have to do to beat OU is tackle in the open field. Whether they see Bama or Florida, both these teams will hold OU to under 30. Texas Tech was a pathetic excuse for a fundamental defense, OSU started strong but faded. It's amazing to see the strategy and the pizzazz of teams these days, but football still comes down to fundamental tackling... it's as simple as that.

If Bama plays OU, they'll man-handle the OU D-line. 28-24 Bama.

If Tebow sees that OU defense, he'll hang 50+ guaranteed. 51-31 FLA.

 

[Low Rollin' 'Noles Fan]

Bama would get smoked.

 

[urfavorite]

BAMA WILL ROLL NEXT 2 GAMES LOL...i like that. we need more posters like this

 

[urfavorite]

come on noles dont you want us to beat your rival? shit!

 

[OTK]

bama would lose big, but florida should definitley be favored over ou. not by much tho.

 

[woodypaige]

bama would lose big, but florida should definitley be favored over ou. not by much tho.

What the fuck do you know? Your from Canada and is still mad because our US teams win yr in and yr out for the the Stanley Cup:nohead:

















jk

 

[Low Rollin' 'Noles Fan]

come on noles dont you want us to beat your rival? shit!

I'm gonna be a huge Bama fan next weekend.

But the team isn't as good as they've played this year. Weak schedule and great coaching has gotten them this far. Wouldn't be shocked at all to see them lose each of their next two games by double digits.

 

[urfavorite]

coaching is everything noles lol...thats why guys get fired year in and year out, what do you mean coaching has gotten them this far of course it has. i give bowden all the credit for the FSU teams in 90s....stick with us noles. lean wit us rock wit us...its not too late to be tide fan

 

[Conan]

First you have to put the asterisk next to the 2pete...

*Played Ohio St. twice

 

[MackDonald]

When the Pac-10 and the big-10 put together a "championship" game (northern/southern division for the pac -10 and an east/west division for the big 10) they will get the exposure needed to give them a betteer shot at the championship game.

Example: who ever wins the Florida/Alabama game [will] be in the national championship game (right or wrong).

 

[urfavorite]

right mr mcdonald sir....

 

[Conan]

When the Pac-10 and the big-10 put together a "championship" game (northern/southern division for the pac -10 and an east/west division for the big 10) they will get the exposure needed to give them a betteer shot at the championship game.

Example: who ever wins the Florida/Alabama game [will] be in the national championship game (right or wrong).

I have a better idea. Why don't the SEC and B-12 shed 2 worthless teams each and play a full 9-game schedule like the Pac-10 does and nobody have any championship games? The way it is now, a team can "luck out" and end up in the championship game without playing as hard a schedule as the others. Not so in the Pac-10 where everyone plays everyone else. No excuses.

 

[MackDonald]

Good point(s) Mr. Conan

I have a better idea. Why don't the SEC and B-12 shed 2 worthless teams each and play a full 9-game schedule like the Pac-10 does and nobody have any championship games? The way it is now, a team can "luck out" and end up in the championship game without playing as hard a schedule as the others. Not so in the Pac-10 where everyone plays everyone else. No excuses.

When a conferance plays a full slate against [all] teams (such as the Pac-10) a true champion is determined via the win/loss route and [all] teams have a shot at the conferance championship.

do they alternate home games each year?

What would happen in the event of a tie? You know how ambigous this BCS business is.

Mack Donald

 

[Flsunman]

First you have to put the asterisk next to the 2pete...

*Played Ohio St. twice

Oh well, a win is a win. Something the Pac-shit never does is win Titles. 2 ouright titles for the Pac-shit since 1970 and no asterisk. Very impressive!!

 

[Flsunman]

I have a better idea. Why don't the SEC and B-12 shed 2 worthless teams each and play a full 9-game schedule like the Pac-10 does and nobody have any championship games? The way it is now, a team can "luck out" and end up in the championship game without playing as hard a schedule as the others. Not so in the Pac-10 where everyone plays everyone else. No excuses.

Um, why not get a championship game? The pac-shit sucks, who cares that you have to play all those shit teams, the b12 and sec teams would welcome it.

 

[Conan]

Oh well, a win is a win. Something the Pac-shit never does is win Titles. 2 ouright titles for the Pac-shit since 1970 and no asterisk. Very impressive!!

HAHAHA... The SEC's record over the last 7 years vs the Pac-10 is 4-7. (Very impressive.) I guess that would mean you guys can't even whup this "shitty" conference. What's that say about you? By the way 3 of those 4 wins were against teams in the Pac-10 with a losing record (Cal @ TN). Take LSU and USC out of that and it's even worse. This year? You went 1-1 vs Pac-10 teams with a combined 7 wins between them. Very nice work. Geezus, you couldn't even beat a 4-win UCLA team with a first time starter and they've barely scored any points all season.

Every win the Pac-10 has vs the SEC should have an asterisk on it.

By the way, I count 6 NC's since the 70's. That's AP, Coaches Poll and BCS since there was no BCS before the late 90's. At least try to get your facts straight. Or did you overhype the conference in a bad way on purpose just to fool everyone? Tsk tsk tsk. Didn't your mother teach you not to lie?

 

[CapNCash]

HAHAHA... The SEC's record over the last 7 years vs the Pac-10 is 4-7. (Very impressive.) I guess that would mean you guys can't even whup this "shitty" conference. What's that say about you? By the way 3 of those 4 wins were against teams in the Pac-10 with a losing record (Cal @ TN). Take LSU and USC out of that and it's even worse. This year? You went 1-1 vs Pac-10 teams with a combined 7 wins between them. Very nice work. Geezus, you couldn't even beat a 4-win UCLA team with a first time starter and they've barely scored any points all season.

Every win the Pac-10 has vs the SEC should have an asterisk on it.

By the way, I count 6 NC's since the 70's. That's AP, Coaches Poll and BCS since there was no BCS before the late 90's. At least try to get your facts straight. Or did you overhype the conference in a bad way on purpose just to fool everyone? Tsk tsk tsk. Didn't your mother teach you not to lie?

TN was ranked 112 in offense and 116 in defense out of 119 teams. and you are bragging that UCLA beat them?

 

[Conan]

When a conferance plays a full slate against [all] teams (such as the Pac-10) a true champion is determined via the win/loss route and [all] teams have a shot at the conferance championship.

do they alternate home games each year?

What would happen in the event of a tie? You know how ambigous this BCS business is.

Mack Donald

Mack, in the event of a 2-way tie, head to head takes the ring. If there are 3 tied teams, they compare W/L vs common opponents. There are more rules than that but it's very unlikely that a tiebreaker would need to go much further. A few tiebreakers down the list, ultimately it comes to a coin flip. Can you believe that?

I think having NO schedule advantages is key to the round robin version of determining a champion and that's why it's the best way of doing things. The only luck of the draw is where the games are played. They alternate between home sites every year.

Now that might be an inconvenience to some conferences like the SEC. They'd have to play 9 conference games instead of only 8 and they'd only get to schedule 3 1-AA teams to fill out their schedule instead of 4. Of course that would necessarily mean lower rankings but hey, why not stack the deck if you can get away with it?

 

[Conan]

TN was ranked 112 in offense and 116 in defense out of 119 teams. and you are bragging that UCLA beat them?

No little dude, I'm not the one who is bragging here. Nor did I start this flaming war. You SEC honks did. (as usual) I'm just proving how futile your argument about the Pac-10 is. Head to head, the Pac-10 beats the SEC and those are historical facts on the record.

 

[GoSooners]

Sorry, I must have accidently clicked into the Scout.com bragadocious "we are the best conference, no we are the best conference" message boards...So I think I'll just leave....Carry on