Window tells President Bush to stay the course in the Iraq war....

Search
TheRightWing

TheRightWing

Wooooooooh Nelly look em' go!!!
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,277
Reaction score
0
By Bill Sammon
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published June 30, 2005


<HR>President Bush, who met with relatives of fallen soldiers before Tuesday's Fort Bragg speech, was urged to stay the course in Iraq by a woman who gave him a bracelet honoring her late husband.
"I said: 'I know people are pushing you, but please don't pull the guys out of Iraq too soon,' " said Crystal Owen, whose husband, Staff Sgt. Mike Owen, was killed in Iraq last year.
"Don't let my husband -- and 1,700-plus other deaths -- be in vain," she added during a private meeting with Mr. Bush at the North Carolina base. "They were over there, fighting for a democratic nation, and I hope you'll keep our service members over there until the mission can be accomplished."
Mrs. Owen gave the president a stainless steel bracelet engraved with the names of her husband and another soldier, Cpl. John Santos, both of whom were killed on Oct. 15.
The president slipped the bracelet on his left wrist and wore it throughout his 28-minute prime-time address to the nation, becoming visibly emotional at times.
"We have lost good men and women who left our shores to defend freedom and did not live to make the journey home," he said as his eyes turned glassy. "I've met with families grieving the loss of loved ones who were taken from us too soon."
Before his speech, as is his custom, the president met for three hours with more than 90 spouses, children and parents of 32 soldiers killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom. The last person he met was Mrs. Owen.
"Even though he'd met with 31 other families prior to me, it was like I was the only one -- I mean, he made me feel special," she told The Washington Times yesterday. "He wanted to know about Mike and about me and if I was OK.
"I did get teary-eyed and he kind of held my hands for a while," she added. "He was very sincere and gave me a kiss on the cheek as he left -- I was a little flabbergasted."
The only other people in the room were two Secret Service agents and a photographer for the White House, which declined to release photos.
Mr. Bush has always barred press coverage of his meetings with family members of fallen soldiers.
"It's a time for the president to comfort the families and reassure them that the world is going to be a more peaceful place because of their loved ones," explained White House press secretary Scott McClellan.
"There were a lot of hugs," he said of the Tuesday meeting. "They shared some tears and some laughs."
Mr. Bush has long been criticized by Democrats for not attending the funerals of Americans who have died in the war against terrorism. But White House officials say the president does not want to disrupt public services or create the appearance that he favors one family over another.
The practice began on Sept. 14, 2001, when the president spent hours visiting relatives of those who had been killed in the World Trade Center three days earlier.
During the highly emotional gathering in Manhattan, Mr. Bush alternately laughed and cried with the families, posing for pictures and giving autographs.
Since then, he has continued the somber ritual by meeting with hundreds of relatives of slain soldiers at such military bases as Fort Stewart, Ga.; Fort Polk, La.; and Fort Lewis, Wash.
At Fort Campbell, Ky., in 2004, he met with 133 relatives of 46 fallen service members. While at Fort Hood, Texas, in April, he met with 90 family members of 33 slain soldiers.
The president wept during a meeting one year ago at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. In December, he posthumously awarded a Bronze Star during a meeting with 50 family members at Camp Pendleton, Calif.
Although not all family members agree with the president's policies in Iraq and Afghanistan, many reported being deeply moved by their sessions with him. These include Dave Bader, whose brother, Staff Sgt. Daniel Bader, was killed in Iraq.
"He was just a regular American who came to talk to us," he told the Denver Post after meeting with Mr. Bush at Fort Carson, Colo., in November, 2003. "I was touched by that."
Others used their meetings with the president to counsel perseverance in the face of withering domestic criticism.
"Mike believed in him," Mrs. Owen said. "He was his commander in chief and would have done anything he was ordered to do.
"I was proud to be a military wife," she added. "And I was very honored that the president would take time out to meet with me personally."
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Ghees ...based on how the Bushies rig these conferences, anyone want to bet she was a plant like Jeff Gannon was

Bush's concern is so "flappin touching"
 

CAPNCRUNCH

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Reaction score
0
I sympathize with all the people who have lost someone in this War!:sad3: Of course these people want to continue the war so their loved ones will not have died in vain! But my problem is with the next widow and kid who receive this sad news. Maybe we can spare these in the future, the ones gone already we can do nothing about but give them our blessings and our thanks! It's not their fault our President used them for a foolish reason at best!
 
Redneckman

Redneckman

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,723
Reaction score
0
Nice classy post Doc as usual. Up yours.
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Redneckman:

you are the one who loves this war and the daily death / destruction it is bringing .....

I dont trust any press confc King George attends as it is nothing but show and tell and Bush is as phony as Pamela Andersons breasts

Redneckman, why is your chickensass here instead of over in Iraq???
 
JinnRikki

JinnRikki

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Reaction score
1
"Don't let my husband -- and 1,700-plus other deaths -- be in vain,"
Please mr. presnit kill another 1700 Americans and 100,000 Iraqis for whatever reason is convenient or that you can ply a ignorant public with. Kill more people that will make it all better.
 
Jointpleasure

Jointpleasure

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Reaction score
0
Bush hasn't learned how to properly fade a lib.

This is what needs to be said:

"Less troops, more missiles."

Bush has lost an edge on his left skate blade. He just keeps moving leftward with every stride he takes.
 

redpimp

New member
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
0
I guess her husbands live will only be worth something if 40,000 americans lose their lives in one of the most useless hopeless battles ever concieved!!!!

What that woman thinks that because her husband is dead then every one should share in her misery? I love how people have such myopic views of the world and issues around them!!!!

Incidentally, when you pack off your loved ones and send them to some god forbidden place to fight a war that is totally useless and will ultimately cause us more headaches back home, doesnt it occur to you that your loved ones are probably going to die? (And dont give me that "anti-american" bull sh!t i aint trying to here that) I have enough friends and family who have been, or are going, or worse yet even forced to go back in this shitty war!!!1

If that stupid woman feels like she has some urgent message she wishes to impart to those iraqis she should pick up a gun and go out there her damn self!!!!
 

CAPNCRUNCH

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Reaction score
0
Jointpleasure said:
Bush hasn't learned how to properly fade a lib.

This is what needs to be said:

"Less troops, more missiles."

Bush has lost an edge on his left skate blade. He just keeps moving leftward with every stride he takes.
Why is that a lib concern? Shouldn't kids dying be everyone's concern? If he would have used missiles instead of soldiers he wouldn't be in such a mess!
 
TheRightWing

TheRightWing

Wooooooooh Nelly look em' go!!!
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,277
Reaction score
0
JinnRikki said:
Please mr. presnit kill another 1700 Americans and 100,000 Iraqis for whatever reason is convenient or that you can ply a ignorant public with. Kill more people that will make it all better.


Ever heard...."kill" or "be killed"??? Pretty much tells the whole story about terrorist's?
 
Jointpleasure

Jointpleasure

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Reaction score
0
redpimp said:
I guess her husbands live will only be worth something if 40,000 americans lose their lives in one of the most useless hopeless battles ever concieved!!!!

What that woman thinks that because her husband is dead then every one should share in her misery? I love how people have such myopic views of the world and issues around them!!!!

Incidentally, when you pack off your loved ones and send them to some god forbidden place to fight a war that is totally useless and will ultimately cause us more headaches back home, doesnt it occur to you that your loved ones are probably going to die? (And dont give me that "anti-american" bull sh!t i aint trying to here that) I have enough friends and family who have been, or are going, or worse yet even forced to go back in this shitty war!!!1

If that stupid woman feels like she has some urgent message she wishes to impart to those iraqis she should pick up a gun and go out there her damn self!!!!


redpimp,

grow up.

My younger brother is heading back to the middle east as I type. He was planning to attend our family reunion this weekend before getting the call. That's just the way it is.
 

redpimp

New member
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
0
Jointpleasure said:
redpimp,

grow up.

My younger brother is heading back to the middle east as I type. He was planning to attend our family reunion this weekend before getting the call. That's just the way it is.


So what???? If god forbid he dies out there, are you going to demand that more people commit their lives to some useless totally pointless war to validate his death? would that bring him back to life? will that some how erase the fact that he was sent to go fight a useless war that had nothing to do with God or Country and was a total fabrication of the ruling class and their business interests..

Explain that to me, because whether i am acting like a child or not will not erase those burning issues...


Like some one said, you have 1700 dead Americans and over 100,000 dead iraqis and counting.....If you think thousands more should die to resolve whatever problem you think exists in Iraq (and while you are it explain scope of that problem to me too because i lost track about a year a go) then its you who is thinking like a child!!!!
 

Marco

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Reaction score
0
"Don't let my husband -- and 1,700+ other deaths -- be in vain."

Why does this situation remind you of someone who gambled all weekend and got buried picking losers, and that same guy is looking for a winner on Monday Night Football to bail his ass out.....you see it all the time in the gambling forums:

"I'm stuck with my local for over 6K and I need a winner tonight to bail me out guys!"

Just keep sending good money after bad, and dig the hole a little bit deeper....

Double the losses, then say "Don't let 3,400+ deaths and $500 billion die in vain!"

Double again....and again....pretty soon it's:
"We've lost over 50,000....time to get out of Vietnam."
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Marco:

ya can bet she was "coached" before this event ....
 
koidog

koidog

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
0
redpimp said:
I guess her husbands live will only be worth something if 40,000 americans lose their lives in one of the most useless hopeless battles ever concieved!!!!

What that woman thinks that because her husband is dead then every one should share in her misery? I love how people have such myopic views of the world and issues around them!!!!

Incidentally, when you pack off your loved ones and send them to some god forbidden place to fight a war that is totally useless and will ultimately cause us more headaches back home, doesnt it occur to you that your loved ones are probably going to die? (And dont give me that "anti-american" bull sh!t i aint trying to here that) I have enough friends and family who have been, or are going, or worse yet even forced to go back in this shitty war!!!1

If that stupid woman feels like she has some urgent message she wishes to impart to those iraqis she should pick up a gun and go out there her damn self!!!!

Classless Post. And Clueless Post. When Doc posted the article on the Woman who lost a Son in Iraq who was now anti-war and protesting Bush you guys thought it was great.

Of Course I pointed out more families that have lost soldiers support the War and our President. But I was very clear, No one can judge how a person grieves, and if the Mother felt protesting Bush was helpful and what her son would have wanted, God Bless her. How can I even imagine her pain?

But you call this woman Stupid? I hope I speak for her when i say to you: "Eat shit".
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Koidog:

lets get real ...Bush has these "meetings" and his goons flush out anyone who voices disapproval with King George

I could give a flyin flap about ruffling the feathers of the airhead crowd that adores Bush ... we have kids dying daily so get your ass over to Iraq as your lip service gets old for someone who adores this great "Commander in Chief"
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Stepford Town Meetings<!--plsfield:stop-->

<!--plsfield:byline-->By E. J. Dionne Jr.
<!--plsfield:disp_date-->Friday, April 1, 2005; Page A27


<!--plsfield:description--><NITF>If President Bush is so insistent on the need for his political adversaries to talk to him about fixing Social Security, then why does he keep throwing them out of his campaign rallies -- excuse me, "town meetings" -- on the subject?</NITF>

<NITF>Lately the president has been chastising Democrats for not sitting down with him to fashion a solution. "I think there is a political price for not getting involved in the process," Bush said in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Wednesday. "I think there is a political price for saying, 'It's not a problem, I'm going to stay away from the table.' " But when Bush's critics show up at the president's taxpayer-financed events, they are often told there is no place at the table for dissenters.</NITF>

Just ask Karen Bauer, who tried to attend Bush's Social Security event in Denver last week with her friends Leslie Weise and Alex Young. They were given tickets by the office of Rep. Bob Beauprez (R-Colo.). "We had on suits; we didn't have any buttons or pins," Bauer said in a telephone interview. Beneath their sober attire, they wore T-shirts that read "Stop the Lies," but decided to keep them covered.</NITF>

<NITF>Before the three could enter, they were stopped and directed toward "a man wearing a smiley-face tie," Bauer says. The man in the tie told them that the Secret Service was coming to see them. Someone "in a suit wearing an earpiece and a lapel pin" came along to say that "we had been ID'd" and "that if we had any ill intentions, we would be arrested and jailed." They were initially seated, she said, but the organizers had second thoughts and escorted them out.</NITF>

<NITF>According to the Secret Service, the man they spoke with was not a government agent but a local Republican volunteer. It appears they were "ID'd" by a bumper sticker on their car that read: "No More Blood for Oil." So don't dare display a controversial bumper sticker if you want to hear your president. The Republican Party is watching you.</NITF>

<NITF>This was not an isolated case. The Bush Social Security tour consists of strictly controlled political meetings similar in spirit to the authoritarian style of Bush rallies during the 2004 campaign. In a famous instance last September, a distraught mother whose son was killed in Iraq was arrested for protesting at a New Jersey rally for first lady Laura Bush. The charges were later dropped, which makes you ask why she was charged in the first place.</NITF>

<NITF>The White House's explanation for the treatment of the Denver Three was not reassuring. "If they want to disrupt the event, then I think that obviously they're going to be asked to leave the event," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. But this is free speech preemption. The three had not disrupted the event. Do we live in a country where the president's representatives are authorized to read citizens' minds to determine who is suitable to hear his speeches?</NITF>

<NITF>Yes, all presidents try to present themselves in the best light, a fact acknowledged by Joe Lockhart and Doug Sosnik, top aides to former president Bill Clinton who also helped John Kerry in 2004. "We clearly used our allies to try to build crowds," Sosnik said of the Clinton approach. But the Clintonians did not exclude opponents, as a review of scores of news stories reporting hecklers at Clinton speeches confirmed. "I'd guess that at one out of every six events, people heckled," Lockhart said, "and Clinton came out ahead." Facing dissent head-on is part of the job description for the leader of a free people.</NITF>

<NITF>And so you wonder why a president who sells himself as a tough, confident bring-'em-on type of guy seems so anxious about facing average citizens who disagree with him. Why does he insist on being surrounded, always, by people who tell him that he's right and great and wonderful?</NITF>

<NITF>Some of Bush's Social Security events have been held at public colleges and universities. Conservatives, sometimes rightly, complain about the oppressive nature of liberal "political correctness." But why should institutions devoted to free inquiry allow themselves to be used for the Republican form of political correctness, in which party officials ensure the orthodoxy of Bush's crowds? Shouldn't universities tell the president he is most welcome, as long as he upholds the traditions of free speech by permitting opponents and supporters alike to hear him? And if the president is serious about transcending partisanship, why does he taunt his adversaries at partisan rallies where the opposition is told to get lost by guys in smiley-face ties?</NITF>


 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,141,205
Messages
13,916,693
Members
104,790
Latest member
JBriggs1991
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com