Wildcard Teams on the Road After Scoring 40 or More

[exploited17]

Since 2000 1-7 ats
Only cover 2003 overrated Chiefs with Trent Green who only had 1 other winning season as QB lost to Colts and Manning.
Lost by 31
11
4(road favorite)
21
4(both teams scored 40 or more)
17
20

 

[G-Man!]

?

 

[exploited17]

?

Ask a question.I don't know what that means.

 

[G-Man!]

The post is random

Who won or lost and what were the lines and how did dogs or favorites do?

Whats is
(4)
21

(4)
17
20

 

[exploited17]

I said teams are 1-7 ats.
All but 1 were dogs.
All the teams lost by the number I posted

 

[XXII]

Since 2000 1-7 ats
Only cover 2003 overrated Chiefs with Trent Green who only had 1 other winning season as QB lost to Colts and Manning.
Lost by 31
11
4(road favorite)
21
4(both teams scored 40 or more)
17
20

So bet AGAINST GB and Houston. Correct??

 

[Mofome2]

So bet AGAINST GB and Houston. Correct??

Only GB as they were on road and scored 48

 

[exploited17]

Only GB as they were on road and scored 48

No bet against both based on this.
It is teams who scored 40 or more and are playing on the road this week. Doesn't mater where they played last week.

 

[SPORTGANSTER]

No bet against both based on this.
It is teams who scored 40 or more and are playing on the road this week. Doesn't mater where they played last week.

Did you said No! Bet against both based on this?
Or no bet against both based on this?

 

[phokingood]

Did you said No! Bet against both based on this?
Or no bet against both based on this?

I’m pretty sure it’s ur first guess. Plays would be SF and balt. Based on the trend I’m assuming.

 

[exploited17]

Personally I am not betting either. I am very picky with playoff bets. I usually look for dogs or small favorites and I like to just watch and enjoy the games unless I feel super strong about it. I think they both cover but I am rooting for Texans and Packers.

 

[xflrejects]

I see quite a few caught up with this stat but one I recall is ANY TEAM who puts up 45+ in any playoff round is a fade the following week. Back in 2011 when NE wasted Denver posting 45+ the LEAGUE stat, at that time, was sitting around 11-27-3 ATS.

 

[Serbone]

I am looking at, and will go with Balty & probably SF, too, for other reasons... but, respectfully, what logic exists that predicts a result ATS against a team that scored 40 or more points, opening round? If they had both won by only 6, would the lines theoretically be -13, -13 or something?

 

[exploited17]

I am looking at, and will go with Balty & probably SF, too, for other reasons... but, respectfully, what logic exists that predicts a result ATS against a team that scored 40 or more points, opening round? If they had both won by only 6, would the lines theoretically be -13, -13 or something?

Well, scoring that much might have an impact on draining a team especially if they dominated in all areas. Maybe overconfidence could hurt them.Then all of that facing one of the best teams who should beat or destroy them anyways. JMO.Any team any system comes along you have to look at if it makes sense.But I could ask the other question. If teams in general who score 45 or more are 11-27 do you think that is just a coincidence? And if so why? It is easy to claim that because there is no way to real explain "just a coincidence" Where as if it makes sense you need a valid point. It is fine if you believe it, but just think about if it makes sense. Also,it may lower the line since people always believe what they see right before them and since it is just one game....well it may very well just be one game.

 

[GasMan]

Faves dominate the day

 

[ShortBusDriver7]

just #1 seeds in Divisional round

35% ATS last 20 years

10-25-1 ATS when favored by less 10 or less, 29% cover rate

Only twice in the last two decades have both 1-seeds covered and won; they've gone 0-2 ATS a whopping eight times.

 

[Mofome2]

just #1 seeds in Divisional round

35% ATS last 20 years

10-25-1 ATS when favored by less 10 or less, 29% cover rate

Only twice in the last two decades have both 1-seeds covered and won; they've gone 0-2 ATS a whopping eight times.

Yikes

 

[ShortBusDriver7]

Faves dominate the day

bold prediction lol. two -500 or better favorites

 

[SPORTGANSTER]

Baltimore On to San Francisco