Why the Dallas Cowboys had a phenomenal off-season

Search

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
41
Tokens
So many people are complaining about the Cowboys not drafting or not going after a famous running back. They did everything right.

The Cowboys have the best offensive line in the entire NFL. Travis Frederick can create holes by himself, Zach Martin was an All Pro in his first season (!!!). Romo's blind side is greatly protected by ROnald Leary and Tyron Smith. The Cowboys' o-line allowed the 2nd-fewest sacks in 2014. On top of that, they have stolen La'el Collins - an expected first rounder - as an undrafted free agent for the "maximum" of $1.65M over three years. And Collins won't even be the starter. So they now have got four first-round linemen since 2011. They also added OT Chaz Green in the third round for some depth.

They had to decide between DeMarco Murray and Dez Bryant. Why would you keep Murray if you have the best offensive line in the NFL that creates massive holes? That wouldn't make sense. First, this game is not won by running, but by passing the football. Same vice versa on defense. Second, there is a big difference between total yardage and the efficiency on a single attempt. You don't win games by collecting a lot of total yards, you win games because you are the more efficient team on a single down. Turnover-prone teams are an exception, logically. DeMarco Murray was the league's leading rusher because he attempted 393 rushes, that's 78 attempts more than any other RB in the league. Murray ran for 4.7 yards per carry behind the best o-line in the league. There were 9 (!!) running backs who ran for 4.7 or more yards per carry with atleast 100 attempts. Mathematically, Murray was the 8th-best running back last season per single down. So, if Jerick McKinnon would have run for a 393 times behind THIS o-line, he would probably have matched the same total number than Murray. Le'Veon Bell would have crushed 2,000 yards. That means the Eagles made Murray, who finished as the 8th-best RB behind the best o-line in the NFL, the fourth-highest paid player on their roster and they also have Sproles & Woodhead.

Behind that o-line, many running backs can run and put pressure off Romo. So will Darren McFadden and Joseph Randle. Tony Romo had such a good protection to throw the highest net-YPPA (7.5) last season along with Big Ben and Aaron. On top of that, Tony Romo had the 6th-best QBR in NFL history. So it is just a logical decision to keep a WR threat instead of DeMarco Murray. The Cowboys offense in 2014 was built to eat the clock, keep the opponents' defense busy and set up the passing game for Tony Romo. When it didn't work, they kept Murray unemployed and took care of business by relying on the passing game behind that phenomenal offensive line.

What did the Cowboys do on the ground during their biggest comeback win in team history vs. STL and in the playoffs in their comeback against DET? Almost nothing. Tony Romo led the comebacks through the air. How did the Cowboys win at Seattle? Because of DeMarco Murray's 6th 100-yard game in a row like ESPN was headlining? No, because Tony Romo threw 7.24 net-YPPA against maybe the best coverage defense. Without those two stupid turnovers, the Cowboys would have annihilated the Seahawks. They outgained them by almost 200 total yards and 1.5 yards per play. How did they manage their game-winning drive in the 2nd Giants game? Murray had one carry for 9 yards and Tony Romo was 6/6 and threw 11 YPPA along with a TD pass. I didn't look it up but I would guess that DeMarco Murray collected a MAJOR percentage of his league-leading total rushing yards when the Cowboys had a lead. The Cowboys don't need DeMarco Murray to be a successful team in 2015.

The biggest problem for the Cowboys was their defense, which was bottom-ten material. They ran so many times to eat the clock and keep their defense sidelined. They had no pass-rush aside some production from Jeremy Mincey and their secondary was a swiss cheese and their whole defense was prone with injuries. They plugged in like how many players on the d-line from 2013-2014? They improved their defense significantly:

CB: Remember, it will be the first year the number six pick of the 2012 draft, Morris Claiborne, will start the season with a full training camp and without an injury (if nothing happens until September). The Cowboys should feel like getting a new guy, a starter. Byron Jones shouldn't have been a first rounder IMO, but due to his freakish athleticism, he brings a new dimension into nickle packages and the CB depth. After pre-season we will know more about his game on the field.

DE: Jeremy Mincey played very good down the stretch in 2014 and the Cowboys just added Randy Gregory and Greg Hardy who will be missing four games. Starting in week 5, the Cowboys will have a very very dangerous front-seven with a DE-rotation of Mincey, Lawrence, Hardy & Gregory. Add to that: Ben Gardner & Chris Whaley return from their injuries. They didn't play a single snap in their rookie season. The Cowboys finally have roster competition on their d-line. It's new for them.

LB: McClain is suspended, but with the return of Sean Lee, their LB position will be much improved come week five. The return of Sean Lee will have a huge impact on the whole defense emotional- and motivational-wise.


Dallas got three possible first-rounders in the draft, adressed their defense significantly, upgraded their already stacked o-line and kept Dez Bryant instead of an overpaid DeMarco Murray - this was a great off-season. I expect great things from this team, starting in week one against the Giants. They are a better team than in 2014 when they won 12 games without a defense. Their only weakness is Safety and it can only be exploited when they face teams who can go vertical while having a good pass protection. There aren't many on their schedule.
 

sdf

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
14,301
Tokens
I dont think offense will be the issue. RUN RUN RUN with some PASS PASS. Kicking should be fine. I'm just not convinced their defense is that much better and that's what needs the biggest improvement.

I agree paying Demarco big bucks would have been a bad idea. I hope they can find a good replacement in the meantime. Hopefully Randle gets his sh** together and becomes THE man. I do not think McFadden. Glad they didnt pay much for him
 

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
41
Tokens
I dont think offense will be the issue. RUN RUN RUN with some PASS PASS. Kicking should be fine. I'm just not convinced their defense is that much better and that's what needs the biggest improvement.

I agree paying Demarco big bucks would have been a bad idea. I hope they can find a good replacement in the meantime. Hopefully Randle gets his sh** together and becomes THE man. I do not think McFadden. Glad they didnt pay much for him

Their defense will be better starting in week one and they will be MUCH better when McClain and Hardy join the team. Their secondary will benefit from the new-look d-line.
 

Dice, Sports & Cocktails
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
13,721
Tokens
Suuma - Welcome to the RX - Thanks for posting this update on Dallas

While I agree that the NFL has become a pass happy league you still need to run the ball in the 4th Q to defend leads.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
41
Tokens
Suuma - Welcome to the RX - Thanks for posting this update on Dallas

While I agree that the NFL has become a pass happy league you still need to run the ball in the 4th Q to defend leads.

Hey powerz, thank you very much. Yes, no doubt about it. But the Cowboys will be able to easily do that. Their offensive line creates massive holes, that's unbelievable to watch. Having the luxury to rotate La'el Collins into the line is something other teams would dream about.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
I hate to tell you this, but this is the same old caca from Dallas homers that we read every season. As long as Romo is the QB and Garrett is the HC, Dallas will continue to be the biggest disappointment in the NFL. They are still miles behind Green Bay and Seattle.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
41
Tokens
I hate to tell you this, but this is the same old caca from Dallas homers that we read every season. As long as Romo is the QB and Garrett is the HC, Dallas will continue to be the biggest disappointment in the NFL. They are still miles behind Green Bay and Seattle.

I hate to tell you this, but I am not a Dallas homer at all. I am a passioned NFL handicapper from Germany and don't care about the Cowboys as a franchise. I only care about making money. This Cowboys team is for real and if you say they are "still miles behind Green Bay and Seattle", you are probably miles away from the 2015 season. The Cowboys annihilated the Seahawks last year and they were a crazy rule - that got changed - away from getting a shot at annihilating them again in the NFC championship game. So to say they are miles behind Seattle and Green Bay is completely out of reality. Tony Romo can be one heck of a QB - which he proved last season with the 6th-best QBR in NFL history - and he and Garrett aren't a disappoitment anymore since Jerry Jones is finally making the moves this team desperately needs.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Messages
271
Tokens
They lost to GB with Rodgers on one leg. Claiborne is a bust. The reason Romo had such a great year was because they were running the ball and limiting his need to turn the ball over. They got a great o line but prob the worse coach in football. Dez is crazy but Witten older and no number 2 receiver. Interesting to see Hardy on their D because the rest of the defense is garbage
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
summa - You are exactly right in everything you said. The Dallas Cowboys are for real and will be a true force this year, I agree. Everyone on this forum (but maybe 4 people) hate the Cowboys so don't pay them any attention. Half of the Cowboy haters will still tell you the Cowboys suck after they win this years SB. Go Cowboys!!!
 

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
41
Tokens
They lost to GB with Rodgers on one leg. Claiborne is a bust. The reason Romo had such a great year was because they were running the ball and limiting his need to turn the ball over. They got a great o line but prob the worse coach in football. Dez is crazy but Witten older and no number 2 receiver. Interesting to see Hardy on their D because the rest of the defense is garbage

Your comment is biased and flawed. I was talking about the 2015 Cowboys and the changes between 2014 and 2015 and you bring up a playoff loss from 2014 as an argument against the 2015 Cowboys. That doesn't make any sense. In the OP I said that the Cowboys had a weak defense in 2014. The best QB in the league, who is 36-4 at Lambeau since 2010, can beat any defense at home. He can also beat weak defenses on one leg. He even would have beaten the Seahawks on one leg if Brandon Bostick catches that stupid onside kick. But furthermore, the Cowboys were totally equal to the Packers in that game and the crazy Dez-rule decided the loss for the Cowboys.

So Tony Romo posted the 6th-best QBR in NFL history, just because they were running and limited his need to turn the ball over? Come on. He had three seasons in which he had a better INT% than last year. Maybe he was brilliant because he finally had a good protection like other QBs always have.

The worst coach in Football? The Cowboys went 12-4 and almost made the NFC Championship game without a defense. Either you have a good defense or keep your defense sidelined. Garrett adjusted the whole game plan to the strengths and weaknesses of his team. He kept the defense sidelined. And if Tony Romo isn't sidelined late against the Skins and against the Cardinals, the Cowboys maybe go 13-3 or 14-2. So just give him credit.

Jason Witten is 33, so no big of a deal. Tony Gonzalez was still a threat in the age of 35-37. Witten started in more than 130 consecutive games, there is no sign of aging with 33.

If you have the best o-line, the best or maybe 2nd-best WR in the league and a future HOF TE that made three straight Pro Bowls, you don't necessarily need a famous #2 WR. Terrance Williams, Cole Beasley and Gavin Escobar represent solid depth.

Morris Claiborne looked like a bust, yes. But there was a reason he went 6th in that draft, and that's talent. He never had the healthy body to perform at an high level in the NFL. If he keeps looking like a bust after a healthy off-season, you could say that.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
548
Tokens
I'm with you, i am not Cowboys fan...in fact i don't prticularly like them as a franchise but you have to be biased to not see their upside and more to the point the value about them at 16 to 1
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,869
Messages
13,574,413
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com