When the US uncovers multiple WMD's in Iraq will

Search
any of the anti-US on this board do the honorable thing and admit they were wrong?

When the link between Iraq and Saddam becomes crystal clear will the leftest admit they were wrong or will they just blame Bush?

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002
 
i'm not an <anti-us>, but i can stil answer your question, right ?
icon_wink.gif


there are several things here that US administration has to prove.

1. reason for the war, was the accusation that Saddam is linked to Al-Queda.

They have to prove this one first.

2. After that, they have to prove that he has WMD.

3. Then they have to prove that he was not going to disarm, as asked by UN, which will be taugh to prove since the UN inspectors said that the disarmement process was advancing.

Finally, they'll have to explain why they changed the regime in a third country, againstthe US constitution, and why they went in a war against that same country without the blessing of UN, which makes this war illegal.
 
don,
#3 is proven he signed the agreement in 1992 to disarm and 11 years later Saddam had not disarmed. Saddam kicked the un inspectors out. The inspectors would have never been allowed back in if it wasn't for the US & UK troops.

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002
 
ok, i can give you credit for that one, but what about the other ones ?
icon_smile.gif


as far as i know, the US constitution does not allow US administration and armed forces to change a regime in another country.

the UN conventions treat all wars not approved by UN as illegal.

#1 reason was the first one that the american administration used to approve the war in iraq. no proofs whatsoever.
 
Don,
I'm not sure why you have this belief that the US has to get permission from the UN to act in its own defense. Think about it, France and Russia are known to be selling weapons to date to Iraq. France and Russia both have veto power in the UN. Why would the US trust the UN to act in the USs best interest while they are violating their own resolutions not to sell arms to Iraq. It really doesn't make sense to think the UN would ever be viable.

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,509
Tokens
When the link between Iraq and Saddam becomes crystal clear will the leftest admit they were wrong or will they just blame Bush?


I never said there was no link between Iraq and Saddam.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,509
Tokens
I never said he didnt have WMD'S. In fact, I AM SURE HE DOES. The United States has more WMD's than the rest of the world combined ? We use our power to attack countries 3% our size, and then wonder why other countries want to get WMD's. Because that kind of levels the playing field a little. Look at how differently we are treating NK.
 
"When the link between Iraq and Saddam becomes crystal clear will the leftest admit they were wrong or will they just blame Bush?" OU 2003


LMFAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hahahaha
 
then we don't need UN, right ?

the thing is, USA respects only those UN decisions that fit their interests.

do you know that USA is only one of maybe 3 world countries that doesn't want to approve the International War Crimes Tribunal, unless there is a clause which says that USA soldiers can not be brought to that tribunal.

however, they approved the International War Crimes Tribunal in The Haag, Holland, for war crimes commited in Yugoslavia and Ruanda.

is it possible that USA is above the laws, and more precisely, above the international laws.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,509
Tokens
It is very likely that hye does have WMD's. I do not believe that gives us a right to go around attacking and taking over every country that has WMD's. Besides that is just an excuse, if not that it would be something else.

First this war was because Saddam was behind 9/11, then it was because he was within a year of having Nukes that he would surley use on us, then it was because he was in vioaltion of UN Resolutions ( We now say that what the UN says is worthless - but want to go to war because Saddam is saying the same thing ??????????????? ). Next, this war was to Liberate the Iraqi people. The pro war crowd cant even make up their minds as to WHY we are going to war.


The biggest Hypocricy of all.


" We do not need to listen to what the UN says. It is a backwards organization and we will not base our foreign policy on what the UN says"

" This war is justified because Saddam is not allowing Iraq's foreign policy to be dictated by UN resolution 1441 "
 
don,
the world tribinal would do no good for charactors such as Saddam. it would only empower tin horn dictators and undermine the US.

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002
 
dannymay,
take your pick they're all good reasons. i believe saddam and his son could turn out to be worse than hitler if they get nukes.

saddam invaded kuwait and had plans to take saudi arabia. if he gets nukes and threatens other countries in the region and europe they would be sure to start crying and drag the US into the conflict then. i much rather take care of the problem now.

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002
 
the bottom line on the UN is they write worthless resolutions they have no intentions on enforcing. so what good is the un?

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002
 
i dont think so.

if the world tribunal in holland, for exemple, is no good, than why they dont allow all those prisoners to go home.

if all dictators should be attacked and thrown down by armed forces, then UK should be attacked as well. why ?

well, because i live in canada, and all canadian laws stil have to be approved by the Queen of England. I feel that she dictates what Canada can or can not do.
 
it's apparent they believe the Iraqi minister of misinformation that the US troops are not even in Baghdad, LMFAO.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
outandup - HELL NO!

They will simply move on to another argument and deny they were ever wrong. Period. That's why I am trying to stop responding to them. I think it's like most sports radio shows are doing now. They get someone on there who speaks with reason and facts and then they will have someone on there to take the other side, just for ratings. I think many of these Liberals are just looking for attention. For example, John Kerry - who the hell was this guy until he started ripping Bush.



KMAN
 
Hello!! Anyone home!!

Are their any honorable leftest on the board?

Can you admit how wrong you were now?

Who will be the first leftest celebrity to admit he or she was dead wrong? I don't believe they'll mean it, but they may say it to save their career.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,857
Messages
13,574,068
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com