When a book post a bad line!

[zeeman]

I guess some posters believe bettors should be paid when a bettor bets on a bad line that was accidently posted by the book. I believe a bet made on obvious bad line should be canceled, but than again I believe bad rules are made to be broken. Many of you think rule is synonomous for fair. I disagree.

 

[Illini]

Every place that I've ever played at, the rules were clear that bets on bad lines would be voided. Standard operating procedure everywhere.

 

[zeeman]

Every place that I've ever played at, the rules were clear that bets on bad lines would be voided. Standard operating procedure everywhere.

So maybe books need to post grading of bets subject to outdated or unfair rules will be voided.

 

[steaktartar]

Every place that I've ever played at, the rules were clear that bets on bad lines would be voided. Standard operating procedure everywhere.

yes this is correct

 

[steaktartar]

So maybe books need to post grading of bets subject to outdated or unfair rules will be voided.

i answered you in another thread.....you have a good case.......and i think the playoffs and ws rules will be changed reg season no............. it is not like reg season where bets may be open for months........i argue against you because of the rules in place that doesnt mean i disagree with you

 

[zeeman]

i answered you in another thread.....you have a good case.......and i think the playoffs and ws rules will be changed reg season no............. it is not like reg season where bets may be open for months........i argue against you because of the rules in place that doesnt mean i disagree with you

Steak,

I understand. Thanks for the respect. This just came to me. The rule should be based on players intent when making the bet. When I bet T.B. last night my intent was to have my bet graded based on the official score of the game. My intent was to never have my bet graded based on the score of the last completed inning. Rule makers need to factor in players intent when making rules.

 

[Illini]

Steak,

I understand. Thanks for the respect. This just came to me. The rule should be based on players intent when making the bet. When I bet T.B. last night my intent was to have my bet graded based on the official score of the game. My intent was to never have my bet graded based on the score of the last completed inning. Rule makers need to factor in players intent when making rules.

Your intent may have been so, but the rains came and washed your intent down the toilet. The books have rules for when such things happen, and Bet Jamaica is just living up to the rules.

Like I said, I had no action on this game, but the books have to follow the contingency plans that were set up beforehand. They are bound by the rules. That's what makes them a good book. Seriously, they lost money making this decision. But it was the only option they had.

 

[steaktartar]

Steak,

I understand. Thanks for the respect. This just came to me. The rule should be based on players intent when making the bet. When I bet T.B. last night my intent was to have my bet graded based on the official score of the game. My intent was to never have my bet graded based on the score of the last completed inning. Rule makers need to factor in players intent when making rules.

i agree for playoffs and ws....it will be changed next year....i know that doesnt help you now......and i 100% believe you on your intent....just a rule that makes some happy some not...and i think it will get rectified.......but reg season no

 

[$tinky]

shut up, you would not say a word if you had philly. learn the rules before you play the game.

 

[Rev_Al]

I'm trying to understand your point, but you need to start another thread for me to completely grasp it.

Thanks,
Rev1

 

[steaktartar]

I'm trying to understand your point, but you need to start another thread for me to completely grasp it.

Thanks,
Rev1

:nohead:....laughing puppy ok here

 

[Doug]

I'm trying to understand your point, but you need to start another thread for me to completely grasp it.

Thanks,
Rev1

:lol::toast::nohead::aktion033:missingte

 

[zeeman]

i agree for playoffs and ws....it will be changed next year....i know that doesnt help you now......and i 100% believe you on your intent....just a rule that makes some happy some not...and i think it will get rectified.......but reg season no

I understand it won't help now. I'm just asking that the rule makers use a little common sense and fairness when making rules. Gearing the rules towards players intent would be fair and also show common sense. What happened last night was totally unfair due to a bad rule. Rule needs to be changed for regular season also, because when a player makes a bet our intentions are to have the bet graded based on the final score of the game. Always try and please the customor, please value our intentions.

 

[steaktartar]

I understand it won't help now. I'm just asking that the rule makers use a little common sense and fairness when making rules. Gearing the rules towards players intent would be fair and also show common sense. What happened last night was totally unfair due to a bad rule. Rule needs to be changed for regular season also, because when a player makes a bet our intentions are to have the bet graded based on the final score of the game. Always try and please the customor, please value our intentions.

i agree.....reg season it wont happen....playoff and ws i expect changes next year............i really hope you land on a good side of this to make up for it

 

[zeeman]

shut up, you would not say a word if you had philly. learn the rules before you play the game.

You are a fuc'n moron. My intent was to have my bet graded based on the final score. I will not bet another baseball game based on this principle. Which is very good for me, because I'm a loser you moron!

 

[Doug]

Doesn't it have to start in LV ?

 

[zeeman]

I'm trying to understand your point, but you need to start another thread for me to completely grasp it.

Thanks,
Rev1

I don't feel like starting another thread, but my point is there are many moron on this site, myself included:nohead:

 

[steaktartar]

Doesn't it have to start in LV ?

usually yes....but im guessing here a few offshore books will make playoff and ws rules adjustments for next year.....i know of two for sure that will.........but next year is next year for the players now..........if anyone is happier books needed tb last night and payed off on a rule(that they SHould have) THAT DID THEM NO FAVORS

 

[Doug]

McCain should make this a plank in his platform.

 

[steaktartar]

McCain should make this a plank in his platform.

he is anti gambling....obama maybe...........jmc is in with his az buddy