What Two Highly Respected Polling People Say

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,524
Reaction score
6,969
As you did in my Crowd Size Thread yesterday, you continue to show your ignorance and inability to debate by posting material which has nothing to do with the

theme of the thread.

In this case, you disparage The New Yorker but do not comment on the material which was presented by the two polling people.

Don't expect me to debate this all long day-I have better things to do.

If you want to discuss/comment SPECIFICALLY on the material presented by the people cited in the article, fine.

Otherwise, Bye(den).
 

Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!!!
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
26,854
Reaction score
6,606
As you did in my Crowd Size Thread yesterday, you continue to show your ignorance and inability to debate by posting material which has nothing to do with the

theme of the thread.

In this case, you disparage The New Yorker but do not comment on the material which was presented by the two polling people.

Don't expect me to debate this all long day-I have better things to do.

If you want to discuss/comment SPECIFICALLY on the material presented by the people cited in the article, fine.

Otherwise, Bye(den).

How can we debate something that you admit to not reading?
 

Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!!!
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
26,854
Reaction score
6,606
What exactly did I admit to not reading?-be specific.

To be clear, I was referring to op.

You said
"Only intelligent and objective people should read this."

That negates you from reading it
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,524
Reaction score
6,969
You said
"Only intelligent and objective people should read this."

That negates you from reading it


If that is what you meant, lets kindly say that you have a lot to learn about expressing a lot more clearly what you mean if this is any indication:

How can we debate something that you admit to not reading?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,524
Reaction score
6,969
Note: "highly respected" for vitturd/savage really means "far left hack with a .173 batting average"

Even if that was true, it beats your batting average which is ZERO with your commentary about Trump's easily winning the Election.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
56,551
Reaction score
16,617
Even if that was true, it beats your batting average which is ZERO with your commentary about Trump's easily winning the Election.

My record here is stellar. Unlike the libtard threads, mine age well. Everything from Trump's 'surprise' electoral college victory in 2016, to the Russia hoax, to the Mueller witchhunt/fix, Ukraine impeachment BS...good or bad news, I call balls and strikes using impeccable sources. Go ahead, do a search and 'bump' till your heart's content. Had you wagered on any of my predicted outcomes, you would have made a fortune. So can your laughable "highly respected sources" crap that would make anyone with a predictit account broke.

I guess after you take it up the ass on election night again, you'll disappear into the night and we'll see in you 4 years under a different ghost? Well, assuming your nursing home will have wifi. LOL
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,524
Reaction score
6,969
My record here is stellar. Unlike the libtard threads, mine age well. Everything from Trump's 'surprise' electoral college victory in 2016, to the Russia hoax, to the Mueller witchhunt/fix, Ukraine impeachment BS...good or bad news, I call balls and strikes using impeccable sources. Go ahead, do a search and 'bump' till your heart's content. Had you wagered on any of my predicted outcomes, you would have made a fortune. So can your laughable "highly respected sources" crap that would make anyone with a predictit account broke.

I guess after you take it up the ass on election night again, you'll disappear into the night and we'll see in you 4 years under a different ghost? Well, assuming your nursing home will have wifi. LOL


Your last statement about this year's Election is what matters and nothing else.

The fact that you need to lie about such matters as my using a double identity(interesting that you haven't taken up on my 100-1 odds on this not

being true), disparaging me personally because of my age and so called inability to express myself articulately and a lot more lies like my "mail

order bride" is quite telling about you.

Also l as not responding DIRECTLY and SPECIFICALLY to any of the threads and posts I make, is

a clear indication of what you are all about, namely a LOSER of the highest order and one of the big reasons I am leaving here to converse with

people who are not only intelligent but objective, and who unlike you, do not live in a world of imagination, delusion and in general who

live in the world as it exists rather than they want it to be!
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,524
Reaction score
6,969

All from the dunce who bet Trump to win the Popular Vote at the "outstanding odds" of a little over 2-1. lol

If I am mistaken and it was someone else who said that, my apologies-I lump all of you clueless fools into one, and sometimes

can't remember which dunce said what.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
89,634
Reaction score
4,092
Hillary is a lock, she won already

HILLARY IS POTUS

OOPS
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,139,128
Messages
13,882,322
Members
104,552
Latest member
anaooanaya
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com