" All they do is win". " they are undefeated". I said that they were last years Miss St. They played no one. They finally played some competition and we see what happened. Cupcakes all the way til they met Sparty.[/QUOT
I had michigan but it was a good game and it was close. could have went either way just glad it went michigans way
" All they do is win". " they are undefeated". I said that they were last years Miss St. They played no one. They finally played some competition and we see what happened. Cupcakes all the way til they met Sparty.
I simply stated that Iowa played no one during the season. They were undefeated until they played a quality team. If they would have played, Michigan, Michigan St, or Ohio state during the season this thread would have never existed. No where in the initial post was there anything said about them getting blown out. As far as your comment about Iowa playing in the Rose Bowl that would be a good matchup with Stanford imo.
had played no one? at Northwestern - ask Stanford about that. at Nebraska - ask Michigan St about that. you wouldn't hear David Shaw or Mark Dantonio calling those teams cupcakes. but I suppose you know more than those coaches huh? and even with Wisconsin being down (9-3) not many teams win at Camp Randall. and Pitt's a quality win.
if you actually watched the B1G Championship game, what makes you so convinced Iowa couldn't beat Michigan or Ohio State? perhaps if Sparty blows out Iowa than you maybe sorta not really have a case about Iowa, but they didn't and in fact Iowa led most of the game. MSU's epic 22 play 9 minute drive to win it will be remembered for years and they certainly deserved the win, but Iowa went toe to toe with a "quality team" (your words) and lost in the final minute. ergo, Iowa is a quality team.
if 12-0 was so easy every team would do it. if 12-0 was so easy you'd have more than ONE undefeated team remaining. get a clue.