week 3 system plays (perfect weekend in both ncaaf and nfl last week)

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
307
Tokens
minnesota +14 (36-4 system)
navy +7.5 (25-3 system)

a few more to come...stay tuned

an_cheers.gif
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
2,179
Tokens
intriguing, I got the Gophers +14.5 (-120) in a 42-10 ATS system, different tighteners probably, but BOL to you, let's cash it
 

New member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
4,716
Tokens
looking forward to your plays, where do you go to get this type of information though???? is there a website you go to specifically, or do you have your own systems?
 

sdf

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
14,301
Tokens
dang. and I have a good 51-14 system on Pitt (and BYU)

i'll definitely hop on Minny though. good luck
 

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
307
Tokens
we can always find systems supporting both sides but i always look for systems that have a lot of sense for specific situations...bol !

should have 2-3 more plays
 

New member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
129
Tokens
whatever your system is it's working great so far...thanks for the plays...ill be watching for the rest!...bol
 

Pourin Up
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
216
Tokens
Hey research could you PM me the formula you used to find the one with nebraska?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
2,179
Tokens
Where can I go to learn the data language you speak about above?


all the parameters are listed on the page and they give you examples

for instance AD <10= Road Dog less than 10 and p: previous game
op:opponents previous game and piles of other parameters

this is one of several things I look at, I don't blindly play a system--believe it or not, I hate perfect systems such as 22-0 and 25-0 because I think they are more likely due for a correction---Lawrence proves this as I lost count the number of perfect systems that lost he uses,

I agree with Reserach above when he says use logic to see how it applies to the situation, any stats are only as good as the logic behind them
 

sdf

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
14,301
Tokens
Lawrence proves this as I lost count the number of perfect systems that lost he uses


does Lawrence give you the exact system that's perfect?

or does he tell you he has a perfect system without proof?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
2,179
Tokens
does Lawrence give you the exact system that's perfect?

or does he tell you he has a perfect system without proof?

Lawrence overtightens systems to get them to 100% to sell them that way to make more money
(he's a businessman), he'll keep plugging in parameters (as many as he needs) until he finds something that usually ends up around 13-0, or 10-0 which is a small sample size IMO, other times he will use team trends and try to pass them off a system (team trends are less random in my opininon and less predicatble since you can usually find team trends on each side, you can have that on systems but there is more randomness on systems since you don't know who will pop up in the system) othertimes he will say this team is 34-0 when they score this many points which sometimes is a big if
 

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
430
Tokens
some systems are good & others are bull, it all depends on the relevance to the stats & situation. i know many people that love statfox & they do have some very good info but by the same token many of their situations are so backfitted it's ridiculous. like, (home favs of 3-7 off a road loss against an in-state opponet vs an opp that won their last game by 20+ & had 8 or more penalties are 17-2 ats.) something along those lines is just ridiculous because one filter has nothing to do with some of the others. not saying that's what research does but others definitely do or follow such trends blindly based just on the record.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
2,179
Tokens
some systems are good & others are bull, it all depends on the relevance to the stats & situation. i know many people that love statfox & they do have some very good info but by the same token many of their situations are so backfitted it's ridiculous. like, (home favs of 3-7 off a road loss against an in-state opponet vs an opp that won their last game by 20+ & had 8 or more penalties are 17-2 ats.) something along those lines is just ridiculous because one filter has nothing to do with some of the others. not saying that's what research does but others definitely do or follow such trends blindly based just on the record. what if someone


I agree. Statfox is crazy. Too many stats used in their systems such as teams do this when they gain 5.4 yards and pick their nose before the snap.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,573,002
Members
100,865
Latest member
dinnnadna
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com