Week 3 #’s (THEGAME9000)

[sds23]

Week 3 #’s

ARI 113
ATL 120
BAL 127
BUF 116
CAR 120
CHI 121
CIN 112
CLE 116
DAL 122
DEN 114
DET 120
GB 122
HOU 121
IND 124
JAX 114
KC 130
LAC 124
LAR 129
MIA 101
MIN 123
NE 132
NO 124
NYG 111
NYJ 106
OAK 114
PHI 121
PIT 119
SF 121
SEA 123
TB 118
TEN 123
WA 111

Pts..............Home Favs..........................Road Favs.............................Home Pick
1..........................................................WWWL
2................WPW...................................W
3................W........................................LL
4..........................................................WWW
5................L.........................................WL
6................L
7................L
8................L.........................................L
9................LL........................................L
10...............
11.........................................................LW
12...............
13...............L
14...............
15...............
16.........................................................W
17.........................................................WW
18...............L
19...............
20...............
21...............
22...............
23...............
24...............
25..........................................................W

FIRST OFFICIAL #’s PLAYS??

NO, SF and maybe OAK??

Waiting for THEGAME9000 to chime in on these. Week #3 seems a bit early to be seeing # plays ... but the #’s have been grouping extremely well (and will again this week with “Home 4s” and “Home 3’s” having 2 games each on tap).

Note for THEGAME9000: So what do you think? NO is a “Road 1” (3-1), SF is a “Home 2” (2-0-1) and MIN is a “Home 9” (0-2) which equals a “fade” and therefore potential play on OAK.

 

[THEGAME9000]

spectacular...no and sf are in for sure....all small favs of 4pts or less are 10-3-1 ats on the year so far, (mine are 11-2 ats going by scoresandodds that I personally use), but youre right on the $.
oak/min game I wouldn't touch until something registers (road favs of 3pts as an example) though its surrounded by winners it could just run opposite all year long.
I haven't seen a year open up this way since 2015 and that year using the system, betting for and against as the season progressed netted a final 83-17-2 ats record (believe it or not)...easily verified by looking back in archives by checking the final posted #'s for that year.
this might be a really good year.

thanx SD.

GAME.

 

[THEGAME9000]

I just looked at the #'s you have, I have Minnesota at 124, atl at 119..all the rest are accurate...go back and check how you changed these teams (ill do the same)...I know it gets intense..thats why im greatful youre doing it.

GAME.

 

[THEGAME9000]

and i have 11-3 in my first post, just a typing error..not 11-2

 

[sds23]

I just looked at the #'s you have, I have Minnesota at 124, atl at 119..all the rest are accurate...go back and check how you changed these teams (ill do the same)...I know it gets intense..thats why im greatful youre doing it.

GAME.

I doubled checked and believe the #’s are accurate. Here’s my math:

To open the season, MIN was 123 and ATL was 121.
In week #1 MIN was a “Home 2” versus ATL and won 28-16 (28-16=12, minus 2=14, equaling an adjustment of 2 points).
The adjusted #’s are then MIN 125 and ATL 119.
In week #2, MIN was a “Road 5” vs GB and lost 21-16 (21-16=5, plus 5=10, equaling an adjustment of 2 points).
In week #2, PHI was a “Road 3” vs ATL and lost 24-20 (24-20=4, plus 3=7, equaling an adjustment of 1 point).
That brings us to week #3, with MIN 123 and ATL 120.

Hope that all made sense.

 

[sds23]

spectacular...no and sf are in for sure....all small favs of 4pts or less are 10-3-1 ats on the year so far, (mine are 11-2 ats going by scoresandodds that I personally use), but youre right on the $.
oak/min game I wouldn't touch until something registers (road favs of 3pts as an example) though its surrounded by winners it could just run opposite all year long.
I haven't seen a year open up this way since 2015 and that year using the system, betting for and against as the season progressed netted a final 83-17-2 ats record (believe it or not)...easily verified by looking back in archives by checking the final posted #'s for that year.
this might be a really good year.

thanx SD.

GAME.

This is why I would like to see you come in and post all “Official # Plays” for us. I will continue to do all the stuff I’ve been doing, but would appreciate your expertise in making the final and official call in terms of posting the # Plays.

Especially if this is shaping up and looking like a potentially huge year for the system! Very exciting!

 

[sds23]

I doubled checked and believe the #’s are accurate. Here’s my math:

To open the season, MIN was 123 and ATL was 121.
In week #1 MIN was a “Home 2” versus ATL and won 28-16 (28-16=12, minus 2=14, equaling an adjustment of 2 points).
The adjusted #’s are then MIN 125 and ATL 119.
In week #2, MIN was a “Road 5” vs GB and lost 21-16 (21-16=5, plus 5=10, equaling an adjustment of 2 points).
In week #2, PHI was a “Road 3” vs ATL and lost 24-20 (24-20=4, plus 3=7, equaling an adjustment of 1 point).
That brings us to week #3, with MIN 123 and ATL 120.

Hope that all made sense.

NOTE: In my hasty attempt to post this info quickly, I made a typing error (but not a mathematical error). In week #1 MIN won 28-12 (by 16 points) and 16-2=14 (just like above) and equaled an adjustment of 2 points.

So my math and results are the same, but I nearly had a heart-attack when I re-read the post and saw my typing error.

 

[ChillyH2O]

Game9000 and Sds23- thanks for all your hard work on this ! I for one really appreciate it greatly and always look for this info every year- I am very thankful y’all take the time to keep the numbers up! Cheers!

 

[sds23]

Game9000 and Sds23- thanks for all your hard work on this ! I for one really appreciate it greatly and always look for this info every year- I am very thankful y’all take the time to keep the numbers up! Cheers!

I really appreciate the kind words Chilly. GAME gets all the credit though ... it’s his baby 100% and he will make the all-important decisions on official “# Plays”. But thank you and BOL with your action!

 

[THEGAME9000]

sd...this is why its you...I adjusted week one between atl and min at 3 pts...my mistake, youre right and im adjusting mine now...thanx...keep doing what youre doing.

and i'll only chip in my 2 cents here and there...you list the plays, you obviously have a vice like grip on the workings...love it.

GAME.

 

[THEGAME9000]

im late in posting and will try to get what I can up later tonight.

GAME.

 

[THEGAME9000]

Just going over the cover chart so far this year, its incredible and terrifying....
I might just run my personal plays this week based on the early grouping...

all favs of 2pts or less...…..6-1-1 ats
all favs of 5 - 9pts...………..1-9 ats
home favs of 5+pts...……..0-8 ats
dd road favs...………………...5-1 ats

always remember the only 2 rules of the #'s....

rule 1....it doesn't matter
rule 2....see rule 1

I truly think we're going to produce a monster this year.

GL and keep it up

GAME.

 

[THEGAME9000]

just doing the math....

all favs of 2pts or less...…..6-1-1 ats
all favs of 5 - 9pts...………..1-9 ats
home favs of 5+pts...……..0-8 ats
dd road favs...………………...5-1 ats

that's over 85% winners....lol

I'LL BE UP IN A BIT.

GAME.

 

[sds23]

sd...this is why its you...I adjusted week one between atl and min at 3 pts...my mistake, youre right and im adjusting mine now...thanx...keep doing what youre doing.

and i'll only chip in my 2 cents here and there...you list the plays, you obviously have a vice like grip on the workings...love it.

GAME.

Whew! I was worried that despite my triple-checking, that perhaps I had a blind spot I was unaware of. Thanks for the clarification. I know you’ll agree, it doesn’t matter who’s right ... accuracy is a must. Thanks GAME

 

[sds23]

I truly think we're going to produce a monster this year.

GAME.

Boy, I sure hope so!

 

[sds23]

spectacular...no and sf are in for sure....all small favs of 4pts or less are 10-3-1 ats on the year so far, (mine are 11-2 ats going by scoresandodds that I personally use), but youre right on the $.
oak/min game I wouldn't touch until something registers (road favs of 3pts as an example) though its surrounded by winners it could just run opposite all year long.

GAME.

This is why I thought it wise to have you “officially” post the final plays ... I would have missed that. You’re using additional ATS info and I was only looking at the numbers alone. Does the extra ATS info still come into play when the numbers mature and start being 3-1, 5-2, etc.? I am thinking that perhaps you used the extra ATS data this time (early on) since 2-0 in week #3 is pretty immature and only 2 bad weeks away from being 2-2. You were able to weed out OAK from the proposed plays. That is why I wanted you to be the “final” say on the # plays.

 

[Saints2016]

Thanks for taking the time Sd and Game. The older I get the more I realize that I know very little.

 

[sds23]

Thanks for taking the time Sd and Game. The older I get the more I realize that I know very little.

Ah, but it is precisely that very realization that equates to true wisdom. Thank you and BOL!

 

[kwr]

sd and GAME....as a long time "viewer", and a very few poster, I sure hope you both keep up with this system. I almost always verify my own findings here, and have in the past. Thank you for all you both do. GAME has saved my butt a few times in the past. Again...THANKS!

 

[THEGAME9000]

This is why I thought it wise to have you “officially” post the final plays ... I would have missed that. You’re using additional ATS info and I was only looking at the numbers alone. Does the extra ATS info still come into play when the numbers mature and start being 3-1, 5-2, etc.? I am thinking that perhaps you used the extra ATS data this time (early on) since 2-0 in week #3 is pretty immature and only 2 bad weeks away from being 2-2. You were able to weed out OAK from the proposed plays. That is why I wanted you to be the “final” say on the # plays.

I always went with the scales have to be tipped by at least 2...0-2...2-0...3-1...etc, so 0-2 can be considered a play definitely, I love having the extra insights just for individuals making a decision one way or the other when they're on the fence.
also when all the stats and insights line up on one side without mercy but the #'s have it the other way, these are ideal situations, like the mia ne game last week...all the stats and trends, spread and history gave you a slam dunk on nyj.
that's why I said there was a dead cat on the line somewhere, it stunk to high heaven, 3 hours later...43-0 new England.
the insights are just a complimentary tool in the decision making process and im running late bigtime, gotta get going to get up what I can....
moving on to more important notes, you probably remember that with the #'s, when a team starts rocketing to 130 and over and 100 and under be careful, they are going to correct themselves and the only way this happens is when the good teams 130+, and the bad teams 100 and under do the unexpected.
be careful with ne and Miami the next couple weeks (no one stays too high or stays too low forever.

now I gotta get busy or I wont make it, see ya in a bit

GAME.