Week 15 insights

[THEGAME9000]

With my PC down its way too tough to post the #'s, so I'll just list the given selections at the end...I apologize but the size of my phone makes it way to easy to make a mistake.

Oak at kc(10.5) 41.5...
Kc 1-10 ats as div home favs s 07
Series..dog covered 12 of last 15
..........road team covered 18 of last 23 s 03
..........6 of last 19 games exceeded 40 total points s 05

Pit(2) at Atl 55...
Pit 2-8 ats off a su win of 21+pts s 08
Pit 3-13-1 ats after scoring more than 35pts s 06
Pit 12-23 under in 2nd of b2b road games s 99
Atl 6-0 ats off mnf s 09

Hou at ind(6.5) 49.5...
Hou 8-1-1 ats after playing jax s 08
Hou 3-9 ats in final road game s 02
Hou 8-2 over off a su road win s 12
Ind 7-3 ats as div home favs a 10
Ind 12-5 ats off a su win and ats loss s 07
Series..fav covered 6 of last 8
..........home team covered 7 of last 9

Cin at cle(-1.5) 43.5...
Cin 3-12-1 under after allowing 35+Pts s 05
Series..su winner has covered 25 of last 30
..........dog is 11-1-1 ats in last 13 s 07
..........teams split ats wins 11 of last 14 years (cle cov 1st)
.........pt totals have been lower in cle 11 of last 15 years (27pts in cin)
.........2nd game has been lower scoring 7 of last 9 years (27pts in 1st)

Mia at ne(7.5) 47.5...
Mia 3-7 ats as div road dogs s 10
Series..home team covered last 5 straight
..........home team covered 12 of last 16 dec matchups s 89
.........teams split ats wins 11 of last 14 years s 00 (Mia covered 1st)
.........team who covered 1st game, failed to cover 2nd 17 of last 22 years (Mia cov 1st)

Tb at car(3) 41...
Tb 2-8 ats as div road dogs s 11
Car 9-1 ats as div home favs s 08
Series..fav covered 11 of last 14
..........team who covered 1st, covered 2nd last 5 straight years (car cov 1st)
..........one game goes over total, one game goes under total 10 of last 11 years
(1st game 34pts scored, game total was 39)
**home teams who scored 35+pts last game vs visitor on 2nd straight road game has gone 33-13 over s 91

Was at nyg(6.5) 47...
Was 0-2-2 ats off scoring 3pts or less s 06
Was 15-6-1 ats as div road dogs s 07
Was 6-19-1 under as div road dogs s 03
Ny 2-7-1 ats off a su win of 20+pts s 09
Ny 4-7-1 ats as div home favs s 09
Ny 0-5 under off a su win of 20+pts s 12
Series..dog covered 6 of last 8
..........only 1 of last 14 games played in ny exceeded 40pts s 00

Gb(4) at buf 50.5...
Gb 0-4 ats off mnf s 10
Gb 14-5-1 ats after allowing 30+pts s 09
Buf 3-0 ats off a su loss and ats win s 12
Buf 12-1 ats off a su road loss s 12
Buf 13-5-1 ats as a non div home dog s 06
**non div favs off a su win who allowed 35+pts in last game are 11-25-1 ats s 80

Min at det(7) 42...
Det 7-2 ats as div home favs s 10
Det 6-2 ats before playing at chi s 05
Det 9-2-1 over in game 14 s 02
Series..dog covered 6 of last 7

Nyj(3) at ten 42...
Ny 16-3 ats before hosting ne s 93
Ten 4-0-1 ats off b2b su losses of 21+pts s 09

Den(4) at sd 50.5...
Den 8-1 ats as div road favs s 09
Series..road team is 9-2-1 ats in last 12 s 09
.........2nd game has been the lower scoring 8 of last 11 years (1st game 56pts)
.........in games where there has been a road fav 8 of last 12 s 97 were decided by dd

Sf at sea(10) 38.5...
Sf 0-3-1 ats as div road dogs s 10
Sf 17-3 ats off a su fav loss s 06
Sea 12-4 ats as div home favs s 07
Sea 15-3-1 ats at home before a div road game s 07
Series..home team is 7-3-1 ats in last 11
..........sea covered last 5 straight
**defending sb champions off an ats win of more than 3pts are 6-23-1 ats s 80 if listed as a dd fav

Extra points

Dal/phi team who covered 1st, covered 2nd 6 of last 9 years (phi cov 1st)
Chi 11-1 ats before playing det s 08
No 7-2 ats as a fav off a su dd loss s 08

#'s selections
Arizona 3-0 ats last 3
Oakland 2-0 ats last 2
Carolina 5-2 ats last 7
Ny giants 7-2 ats last 9
Green Bay 6-2 ats last 8
Detroit 3-1 ats last 4
San Francisco 2-0 ats last 2
Philadelphia 7-2 ats last 9
Chicago 3-1 ats last 4

GAME.

 

[cruisin]

Seeing it say SF 2-0 last 2, they lost SU to Raiders, am I missing something?(Even using the numbers, SU loss--wouldn't it make SF 1-1?

 

[Green17]

Seeing it say SF 2-0 last 2, they lost SU to Raiders, am I missing something?(Even using the numbers, SU loss--wouldn't it make SF 1-1?

"The 2-0 ats last 2" does not have any meaning at all to the team of SF.
It means that by GAME's team rating chart, which he was not able to post, differences between SEA and SF lends itself to an ats situation which has gone 2-0 the last two. I know this is difficult to explain without the benefit of his chart, but that is what it means. And without GAME posting the numbers, it is impossible for any of us to illustrate the derivation.

 

[cruisin]

Oh yeah yeah, that's right, thanks for the refresher:toast:

 

[escrow]

"The 2-0 ats last 2" does not have any meaning at all to the team of SF.
It means that by GAME's team rating chart, which he was not able to post, differences between SEA and SF lends itself to an ats situation which has gone 2-0 the last two. I know this is difficult to explain without the benefit of his chart, but that is what it means. And without GAME posting the numbers, it is impossible for any of us to illustrate the derivation.

That was very nicely stated. Good Luck To Us All! Happy Holidays

 

[whiskeybent]

No full numbers? WTF. Hard to see who is who and what is what?
Need a paycheck play and some SB thoughts.
I still can't believe KC blew that playoffs game last year!

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

No full numbers? WTF. Hard to see who is who and what is what?
Need a paycheck play and some SB thoughts.
I still can't believe KC blew that playoffs game last year!

Smh at alcohol. Be grateful

 

[THEGAME9000]

#'s are up..you guys are right, I said up full and so they are..
It always helps to see it...

GAME.