Week 10 #’s (THEGAME9000)

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
Week 10 #’s

ARI 112
ATL 112
BAL 127
BUF 117
CAR 120
CHI 122
CIN 109
CLE 117
DAL 122
DEN 117
DET 120
GB. 122
HOU 127
IND 123
JAX 116
KC. 128
LAC 122
LAR 125
MIA 102
MIN 127
NE. 127
NO. 125
NYG 112
NYJ 106
OAK 117
PHI 121
PIT 122
SF. 126
SEA 122
TB. 121
TEN 118
WA. 108

Pts..............Home Favs..........................Road Favs
Pick............W-5, L-3, L-1.......................L-4
1................LLLLLWWW..........................WWWLWWPWWPLL
2................WPWLWLLWW......................WWL
3................WWLWLL.............................LLLLWWL
4................LWW...................................WWWWLL
5................LWWLL...............................WLL
6................LWL...................................WLWLLL
7................LLW....................................WWW
8................LWLLL.................................LWWW
9................LLWLW................................LLLWW
10..............L........................................WLL
11..............LW......................................LWW
12..............L........................................
13..............LW......................................W
14..............WL......................................LL
15..............W
16..............WW.....................................W
17........................................................WW
18...............LL......................................L
19...............L........................................L
20...............
21...............WL....................................WW
22........................................................W
23...............
24...............
25........................................................W
26...............L.........................................



Week 10 # PLAYS:

PIT & NYJ
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
I believe that’s 0-10-1 on the last L11 posted # plays ... I would obviously advise fading or just watching from the sidelines until this thing finally flips.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
Time to bounce back.

I like your optimism! And there’s no doubt that the #’s will indeed rebound. But I’m going to continue to play the role of spectator until they do ... @):toast:
 

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Messages
101
Reaction score
11
I understand but I been following Games' # for few seasons. Never been that BAD and I think its due.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
I understand but I been following Games' # for few seasons. Never been that BAD and I think its due.

I know exactly what you mean. I’ve been aware of GAME’s #’s since first becoming a member (2006) and probably started following them closely a few years after that. Anyway, I agree. Never seen anything like this. Not even remotely close. And even when a few cool streaks did arise, the #’s ALWAYS came roaring back and went on long consistent winning streaks.

The reason I’m currently advocating a “watch-n-see” approach is because something seems strange this season (in regard to the # System). I can’t quite place my finger on it ... maybe it’s a mixture of many factors ... I’d love to hear what GAME would have to say about it. There have been some strange factors at play (both for the # System as well as the NFL).
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,286
Reaction score
7,469
sds…….appreciate the added info buddy....will watch for awhile, sure the wins will come (as always)……...bol with your action...….indy
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
sds…….appreciate the added info buddy....will watch for awhile, sure the wins will come (as always)……...bol with your action...….indy

Thank you sir. I think it’s all we can do at this point (wait and see). BOL with week #10 Indy!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,961
Reaction score
205
sorry boys I was unavailable to use the computer the last few weeks but ive been following...3 bad weeks in a row (1 week to many-by average-for the #'s to bounce back), its always usually a week or two for them to roar back, but I see they did last week finally.
sd, were you a little leary posting only 2 selections this week, if so that's understandable, I had 5 for posting...chi, nyj, gb, pit and sea...5-0
post who they provide, everybody knows its not you personally who can be held accountable for any bad week (as you know), its just how the #'s play out...at some point they're gonna get back to doing what they do, you know that better than everybody.
now that I have access again i'll have some stuff up for this weekend, you're doing killer work and it eats up time..im glad you're on it thanx.
wk 11...no,den,nyj,bal,phi,cin… some look like seriously bad choices, ones nobody will take, (not even me), just who I got the #'s giving me. I gotta compare our #'s later when I have time to see if we still match exact.

I also will pop up a piece of SB info that's been killing me now the last couple weeks, with everybody knowing how my feelings are with seeing NE keep going back to the game every year after year after year after year...
feels good being available access again.

be up this weekend..

GAME.
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,286
Reaction score
7,469
G/9000.....both you and sds have done a great job and appreciate all your time and efforts...…BOL with this weeks action buddy...…..indy
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,557
Reaction score
56
wk 11...no,den,nyj,bal,phi,cin… some look like seriously bad choices, ones nobody will take, (not even me), just who I got the #'s giving me. I gotta compare our #'s later when I have time to see if we still match exact.

Which ones?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
G/9000.....both you and sds have done a great job and appreciate all your time and efforts...…BOL with this weeks action buddy...…..indy

Thanks Indy! Always appreciate your support and feedback!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Reaction score
60
sorry boys I was unavailable to use the computer the last few weeks but ive been following...3 bad weeks in a row (1 week to many-by average-for the #'s to bounce back), its always usually a week or two for them to roar back, but I see they did last week finally.
sd, were you a little leary posting only 2 selections this week, if so that's understandable, I had 5 for posting...chi, nyj, gb, pit and sea...5-0
post who they provide, everybody knows its not you personally who can be held accountable for any bad week (as you know), its just how the #'s play out...at some point they're gonna get back to doing what they do, you know that better than everybody.
now that I have access again i'll have some stuff up for this weekend, you're doing killer work and it eats up time..im glad you're on it thanx.
wk 11...no,den,nyj,bal,phi,cin… some look like seriously bad choices, ones nobody will take, (not even me), just who I got the #'s giving me. I gotta compare our #'s later when I have time to see if we still match exact.

I also will pop up a piece of SB info that's been killing me now the last couple weeks, with everybody knowing how my feelings are with seeing NE keep going back to the game every year after year after year after year...
feels good being available access again.

be up this weekend..

GAME.

Thanks GAME. I always appreciate the feedback!

In regard to the plays I didn’t post last week ... SEA wasn’t a potential play. In fact, SF was a “Home 4” which was 2-1 entering week 10. And in terms of the CHI and GB plays, those were “Home 2’s”, which were 5-3 entering week 10. I was not comfortable advising a 5-3. Here is why:

Here’s how I view a 5-3 ... let’s compare it to a 2-1 for instance. I would not advise playing a 2-1. But if a 2-1 matures into a 4-2 or 6-3 (still the same percentage obviously, but now trustable), it is now a “playable”. Now compare that 2-1 scenario with a 5-3 ... a “5-3” is merely a “4-2” that went 50%. Sure, it still has a chance to go 6-3, but it also has an equal chance to go 5-4. Too much variance. And obviously 5-4 is no good and is a 4-2 that’s gone 1-2!

That’s just my humble opinion anyway. But I will always defer to you. If you’re comfortable playing 5-3’s, then we will be posting 5-3’s. It’s just that simple at the end of the day. I tend to be a bit conservative. So just let me know. :toast:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,139,247
Messages
13,884,233
Members
104,565
Latest member
desigaram78
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com