Wazzu +30 @ Stanford

Search

New member
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
7,947
Tokens
WOW.


Who ever thought the Stanford Cardinal would be laying 30 against a BCS team?



I don't even know what to say.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
8,810
Tokens
I've been fading Wazzou all year. Until the trend is broken I'm gonna keep on doing it!


(Here I go again!)....


---
 

No Respect make the Situation worsen
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
2,021
Tokens
I've been fading Wazzou all year. Until the trend is broken I'm gonna keep on doing it!


(Here I go again!)....


---
WSU and Wyoming need to cancel their football programs. I might lay it too
 

New member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
3,696
Tokens
USC minus the 40 so odd points isn't a bad play either. The whole entire state is a fraud this year. Best team in the state of Washington is Eastern Washington.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,777
Tokens
Be careful with USC. They were up 41-0 vs. Wazzu a few weeks ago and walked off the field at halftime with the ball sitting at the Wazzu 10. Did not call timeout or anything. Just let the clock run out. Carroll I don't think called a single pass play in the 2H but they still scored 4 TDs almost by accident. He was deliberately trying not to run it up. Washington is better than Wazzu and if Carroll takes the same stance in this one they may not cover 43.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
8,810
Tokens
Be careful with USC. They were up 41-0 vs. Wazzu a few weeks ago and walked off the field at halftime with the ball sitting at the Wazzu 10. Did not call timeout or anything. Just let the clock run out. Carroll I don't think called a single pass play in the 2H but they still scored 4 TDs almost by accident. He was deliberately trying not to run it up. Washington is better than Wazzu and if Carroll takes the same stance in this one they may not cover 43.


That's true. I was watching and I was pissed he didn't tack on a field goal. Personally, I think a team should go for a FG in that situation just for the kicker's sake. I had USC and the points so I wanted to see them score there. I agree w/ you that USC may not "RUTS" and 40 is a lot of points. The only reason I took the points in the Wazzou game was....it was Wazzou!

(Here I go again!).....


---
 

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,777
Tokens
Yeah, I laid 27 with Stanford tonight the minute the lines came out. Wazzu is the worst BCS conference team I have ever seen.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
577
Tokens
Wasu will be lucky to score more than 10 points. Go ahead and play them and I guarantee you will be shitting your pants in the 4th Quarter hoping for a fluke play to get a back door cover.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Be careful with USC. They were up 41-0 vs. Wazzu a few weeks ago and walked off the field at halftime with the ball sitting at the Wazzu 10. Did not call timeout or anything. Just let the clock run out. Carroll I don't think called a single pass play in the 2H but they still scored 4 TDs almost by accident. He was deliberately trying not to run it up. Washington is better than Wazzu and if Carroll takes the same stance in this one they may not cover 43.

Valid point, but the difference is at home you have more players who haven't played and they will run more offensive sets with newer players in the game.

I like USC 1st half. They will be up 21-0 at the end of the 1st quarter.
 

sdf

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
14,301
Tokens
USC doesnt cover the big numbers in conference well. they are 0-4 ATS last 4 as faves of > 30 ponts at home.

Against Wazzu, USC couldnt help but keep scoring.

washington does suck but they should keep it within the number I would think. 45-7 maybe....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,916
Messages
13,575,164
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com