Washington +10.5!!! that is a big line

Dante · Nov 23, 2004

In recent memory I do not recall a line that big for pitt to try to cover...do hey get this win and NOT cover?

thanks:smoker2:

bookemdano · Nov 23, 2004

DANTE....saw pitt was a fav of over 10 twice in the last 3 years...0-2 ats...in 2001 they were 10 pt favs twice..covered reg season -10 v det...lost s/u vs pats in playoffs at -10...in '02 they were -10.5 v cinn and-13.5 v houston..won both but did not cover...washington has just 2 rushing td's this season...good luck getting another v pitts d...did'nt they trade for clinton portis???...can patrick ramsey put up anything v pitt??...wash d has played pretty well and i would guess only way pitt does not cover would be wash d keeping it close...bol

winkyduck · Nov 23, 2004

agree - but if Pitt scores 14 they have a 50/50 chance of covering.

the skins offense couldn't score if they walked naked into a nymphomaniacs convention with a schlong bigger than Tommy Lee

CedarCreaker · Nov 23, 2004

winkyduck said:
agree - but if Pitt scores 14 they have a 50/50 chance of covering.

the skins offense couldn't score if they walked naked into a nymphomaniacs convention with a schlong bigger than Tommy Lee

LOL..........I agree 100% Duck....Philly ez cover the 10 1/2 points last week against the hapless skins and Pitt much better "D" vs the Skins sucked "O"....Don't you know Gibbs wished he was back racing cars!!!!

unochamps · Nov 23, 2004

WASH IS A VERY BAD TEAM, I WATCHED THE WHOLE GM AGAINST PHILLY AND THE EAGLES LOOKED TERRIBLE AND STILL BEAT AND COVERED AGAINST THEM. THERE OFFENCE IS VERY CONSERATIVE, THEY KEPT THROWING A LITTLE 2 YD PASS ALL DAY LONG. PITT SHOULD WIN AND COVER EVEN IF THEIR ALARM CLOCKS DON'T WORK.:monkey: :monkey: :monkey: :digit: :hump: