US senator calls on Annan to quit ??

Search

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>

I'm confused...
I thought that being a corrupt POS was an essential qualification
if you were going to do well in American politics.
Or are only Americans allowed to be morally bankrupt.

This was a hugely successful scam and they should make him
a lifetime honorary member of the Republican party.

It must be because hes a black guy.
smile.gif


----------------------------------------------------------
US senator calls on Annan to quit


</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
_40078718_annanmike_body_ap.jpg
It is the first time a senior politician has called on the UN head to quit



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->A US senator has called on UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to quit over alleged corruption in the oil-for-food programme in Iraq.


Norm Coleman alleges ex-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was allowed to profit from the UN-backed scheme and that Mr Annan is ultimately responsible.

The Republican senator is conducting a congressional probe of the allegations.

Correspondents say dissatisfaction with Mr Annan is rife among US Republicans, and is shared by the White House.



This is the first time a senior politician has called in plain terms for the secretary general to go.

Mr Coleman, who is chairman of the Senate investigations sub-committee and a member of the Senate foreign relations committee, claims Saddam Hussein personally made more than $20bn in illegal profit from the scheme.

"The decision to call for Mr Annan's resignation does not come easily, but I have arrived at this conclusion because the most extensive fraud in the history of the UN occurred on his watch," Mr Coleman said in an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.

He added Mr Annan was "at the helm of the UN for all but a few days of the OFF (oil-for-food) programme, and therefore, must be held accountable for the UN's utter failure to detect or stop Saddam's abuses".

Senator Coleman says the UN cannot root out corruption while Mr Annan is in charge.

No confidence

The attack follows the disclosure earlier in the week that Kofi Annan's son had received money from a company under investigation in connection with allegedly corrupt oil-for-food payments.

The UN says there is no evidence of wrongdoing, but asked if the Bush administration still had confidence in the secretary general.

US ambassador to the UN John Danforth pointedly avoided saying yes, thus giving the green light for Senator Coleman to lead this effort to have Mr Annan sacked, says the BBC's Justin Webb in Washington. The UN's Iraq oil-for-food programme allowed Baghdad to sell oil in exchange for civilian food and supplies between 1996 and 2003 to ease the effects of the international sanctions.


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4060249.stm
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
Bill Clinton, international superhero, should get the Job.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,742
Tokens
Clinton should be arrested and sent to Gitmo for selling NUKE secrets to the Chinese, end of story. The UN should be kicked out of the US tomorrow, along with the ACLU..
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
once we get rid of the UN...
once we get rid of the ACLU...
once we've bombed Iraq into the stone age...

:>Grin>

Is it just me. or is this list going to grow...
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Tokens
Coleman probably thinks Rumsfeld is doing a bang up job also. How is Annan any more culpable of failings under him than Rumsfeld is?
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
eek:

too much!!!

I am laughing my ass off as I have had a few beers and not sure what to expect when I saw this thread ....

Congrats on stating the obvious!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Clinton should be arrested and sent to Gitmo for selling NUKE secrets to the Chinese, end of story.
And now of course the Chinese are giving this nuke tech to Iran.

<TABLE class=tborder cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 1643390" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>eek.</TD><TD class=alt2>once we get rid of the UN...
once we get rid of the ACLU...
once we've bombed Iraq into the stone age...

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Your wrong...bombing them UP to the stone age is more accurate.
How about the lefties sh!t list.

once we get rid of the Constitution
once we get rid of Jesus
once we get rid of the rule of law
once we get rid of corporations
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Gameface:

You can lay blame at ALL administrations ... look at your boys arming Hussein to the Max and trading arms for hostages back in the 1980's

If you are gonna throw Clinton in, save some room for North, Bush & others ...

Lets get real if ya gonna blame Clinton solely ... hell, the Bushies laughed him off when he warned them about Al-Queda in 2001
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,742
Tokens
Doc,



Come on! Get real. The US had a interest in backing Saddam against Iran. What was the USs interest (Clintoons) in giving the communist chinese NUKES. Give me a break there's a big difference in NUKE secrets and bullets and bombs.

How about giving North Korea NUKES? Clintoon should be in Gitmo.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Gameface:

Unlike you .. I dont blame one single party ... bblight will tell you I hate Republicans ... Nope, my business partner is a Republican and I voted for Bush 41 in 88 and Reagan both times ... I hate this administration and the Neo-Con mentality

C'mon, lets get real ... blaming Clinton and not realizing this country has been the worlds biggest arms dealer for the past 30 yrs is idiotic
Respect your opinion but lets face facts and spread the blame between both parties
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Gameface ... classic "Flashback":

1/9/87
The White House releases the finding - signed by President Reagan on January 17, 1986 - authorizing the sale of arms to Iran and ordering the CIA not to tell Congress. Also released is the 2 1/2 page memo justifying the policy, which the President had not read.


1/28/87
"On the surface, selling arms to a country that sponsors terrorism, of course, clearly, you'd have to argue it's wrong, but it's the exception sometimes that proves the rule." - George Bush on Good Morning America.


 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,027
Tokens
I agree w/ you Doc mercer, it's funny how a U.S Senator can even think for one sec that the Int'l community will aprove or will agree to Annan's resignation when the U.S never listened to the U.N on the Irak invasion for instance and now they want to rule this Int'l Organization.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,859
Messages
13,574,239
Members
100,878
Latest member
fo88giftt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com