Tuesday's College Basketball Action

[Brock Landers]

Hello all you winners!

Hope that you have been getting some of this advice from me and others like NY Reb and the fabulous Pittbull (although he is away right now), cause if you are you can't be losing. Lovely card tonight so lets get to it..

1)Pittsburgh - ML. I will go with the Money line here even though i think they can cover the 7, i have NO DOUBT they win outright, thus i am willing to lay the extra wood.

2)Oklahoma St -1. I love this team right now, for the last good while they have been as consistent and dependable as anyone, really don't see that changing regardless of the fact its on the road where they have won in VERY difficult places like Ames and Austin.

3)5 team 5 point teaser..

Michigan St +7 1/2
Pittsburgh -2
Oklahoma St +4
Southern Illinois -1 1/2
San Antonio Spurs -1 (Houston off 3 OT's!)

GOOD LUCK ALL!!

 

[Brock Landers]

Anyone know when the NY Reb normally posts his picks?

Reb any comments on mine?

 

[thefawv]

Brock, don't your get concerned about laying Big Cash to win little money? I see you play the ML all the time! I think you need to hit about 85-90% of the games to make a profit. Do you have a lot of success with the ML? Thanks man! - FawvDog

 

[jcambert]

FawvDog, I don't play the money line, but, your statement is incredibly innacurate. You say that he would have to hit 90% to be profitable. This would be true if the average money line that he was playing was -900, and, I doubt that very seriously.

JP

 

[Brock Landers]

Well in cases where i play the moneyline, i look at games where i am extrmely confident the team will win, but not so sure about that cover. And i the case of a lot of those types of plays for me, i wager to win a specific amount of money, say 500 dollars. So its almost irrelevant what i am risking when i feel confident enough to want to win the amount i am looking for. Make sense??

Also since you have been following my plays of late, you haven't seen many ML losers at all, count them on one hand this month...

 

[thefawv]

Sure, but man...to win $500, you may have to lay $1500...that would suck to lose...which I have done before...just recently on a Duke game! GL - FawvDog

 

[Brock Landers]

understood...but sometimes that risk is necessary, say for example last night, i LOVED Memphis (NBA), they jackass's couldn't cover their spread, but cashed in the ML, Minnesota (NBA) is notorious this year for that too, winning but not covering. I think nothing bugs me more than a team winning but not covering..

 

[thefawv]

Yeah, you do great with the ML's! I'm with ya on the Pitt game, but I'm concerned they may not even win... Grrrrrr! Hopefully, they will kick A$$ in the second half! GL - FawvDog

 

[Brock Landers]

You were worried about Pittsburgh?? LOL

Now if Okie st would come to play in the 2nd half, we will be all good!

 

[thefawv]

LOL!!!

I love when you are confident!!! Nice job, Brock!!! Money in my pocket bro!!! Woohoo!!! Thanks! - FawvDog

 

[Brock Landers]

Well even though it was a bit of a miracle for Okie st to have been in position for the straight up win and cover, we will take the fact that they didn't blow up the teaser as well as a great thing..

A 1000+ dollar winning night even without them!

Lets get MORE tomorrow, Huge slate of games to decifer..