Trump's Second Term Chances Fade

[savage1]

Perhaps I am dreaming, but I would love to see some folks actually talk SPECIFICALLY about points in the article and why they either

agree and/or disagree and why.

I personally believe it is a very fair article at this juncture, including the implication/possibility that as Yogi Berra

implies that it "ain't over until its over," meaning that the same scenario is possible as in 2016

with the EC Votes(although I think the chances are very remote for lots of known reasons).

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...d-term-chances-fade/ar-BB1a8QXZ?ocid=msedgntp

 

[Willie99]

Caution, clueless buffoon at work

This man is going to die ignorant and poor, still waiting for some politician to save his pathetic soul

Anyone who has to buy a foreign bride is just one pathetic soul, a loser in life nobody talks too

 

[savage1]

Caution, clueless buffoon at work

This man is going to die ignorant and poor, still waiting for some politician to save his pathetic soul

Anyone who has to buy a foreign bride is just one pathetic soul, a loser in life nobody talks too

Not shocking-the usual skin deep response which just corroborates my beliefs and those of any objective person that Willie 99

has neither the intelligence, education or those "superior genes" to respond to what I suggested in previous post.

Instead he as nothing better to offer than his usual lies about me, which reflect badly on him and not on me.

Envy, jealousy are quite evident as I possess so much more than he does both in the way of tangibles and intangibles.

And of course, lets not forget the fact that in some part of his brain either on a conscious and or subconscious level, he is doubly pissed off

because he realizes that Trump is not exactly in a very enviable position re: his election chances.

Thus when he encounters someone like me who doesn't want Trump to win, that person represents what the proverbial red represents to a bull.

ps No charge to him for this psychological analysis from this person with "inferior genetics" to his. lol

 

[704EVER]

Trump is going to crush it in all the locked down Democratic states, especially Michigan. Just sit back and watch the punishment at the polls for the Dems, due to that Scumbag Gov. Whitmers' Bull Shit lockdown!!!

 

[Cheddar]

Not shocking-the usual skin deep response which just corroborates my beliefs and those of any objective person that Willie 99

has neither the intelligence, education or those "superior genes" to respond to what I suggested in previous post.

And did you notice you were the first person to not do what you suggested?

 

[REDEYE]

Trump is going to crush it in all the locked down Democratic states, especially Michigan. Just sit back and watch the punishment at the polls for the Dems, due to that Scumbag Gov. Whitmers' Bull Shit lockdown!!!

Couldn't agree more..you throw in the violence that Dems don't condemn , defunding the police agenda , its going to get real ugly on the 3rd..

 

[roadreeler57]

Couldn't agree more..you throw in the violence that Dems don't condemn , defunding the police agenda , its going to get real ugly on the 3rd..

+ The latest Biden scandal its going to be murder for the Communist Dems https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

 

[Dafinch]

+ The latest Biden scandal its going to be murder for the Communist Dems https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

Dream on, Dipshit, dream on. Meanwhile:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-74iHBJy4xU&ab_channel=CNN

[h=1]Then and now: See Electoral College projection 16 days before election[/h]Ain't gonna be no voter apathy THIS time, Repub scum, your voter suppression efforts notwithstanding. Bend over and bite that pillow, bitches.

 

[BuzzKill]

Should we start calling Joe Biden the Big Guy or Mr. 10%?

 

[Dafinch]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9KOwzAWXCM&ab_channel=NBCNews
[h=1]Why Biden's October Poll Lead Is Different Than Hillary Clinton's | Meet The Press[/h]

 

[TimmyRules]

Didn’t savage say he was done after results??

Guess he wants to go out in a blaze of glory over the 17 or so days...

Let him have his fun....:think2:

 

[savage1]

Didn’t savage say he was done after results??

Guess he wants to go out in a blaze of glory over the 17 or so days...

Let him have his fun....:think2:

I am done after the results are in or at the latest Inauguration Day if there is any hanky-panky by Trump after he loses.

At least I took the tie to respond to your other thread.

Hopefully some others will do the same, although I have my doubts.

 

[rwjr]

& savage wants to know why his FOREIGN wife laughs at him Loser!@#0

 

[savage1]

& savage wants to know why his FOREIGN wife laughs at him Loser!@#0

And rwjr wants to know why any decent and respected company will laugh at his mail order Correspondence "Degree" when looking for a job.

 

[savage1]

Imo if the only people in the country who were permitted to vote in this Election were active members of gambling

forums like this one, then yes Trump would win in a massive landslide, as overall there is a strong correlation

between Trump activists/one's overall mindset and a dominating interest in sports wagering and related

matters.

 

[JDub984]

I'm just going to say this, the polls are wrong. I don't know by how much, but they are not accurate. I had an inside look at a small polling org. and can say with certainty that I would not trust the results that were produced for the various political organizations that were sponsoring the polls. I can only speak for what I saw with this one, but I imagine that what happened here is not unique. I better understand now what happened in the 2016 election and barring massive cheating on the mail in ballot side, expect to see a similar result in this election.

I also have yet to talk to one person that has participated in a survey or knows of someone who has. There really is a silent majority that does not want to make known their political leanings to the general public, especially with what has been going on around the country. For every yard that has a Trump sign, there is probably 2 or 3 more that doesn't, but will be voting for him.

 

[Dafinch]

I'm just going to say this, the polls are wrong. I don't know by how much, but they are not accurate. I had an inside look at a small polling org. and can say with certainty that I would not trust the results that were produced for the various political organizations that were sponsoring the polls. I can only speak for what I saw with this one, but I imagine that what happened here is not unique. I better understand now what happened in the 2016 election and barring massive cheating on the mail in ballot side, expect to see a similar result in this election.

I also have yet to talk to one person that has participated in a survey or knows of someone who has. There really is a silent majority that does not want to make known their political leanings to the general public, especially with what has been going on around the country. For every yard that has a Trump sign, there is probably 2 or 3 more that doesn't, but will be voting for him.

So, you supposedly had an inside look at a small polling org., but you imagine that whatever it is that you saw is "not unique." Why is that? Also, are you aware that, on average, that HRC was expected to win the popular vote by 3%, and she won by 2.1%? Do you know that, generally speaking, being off 3 or 4 per cent is the margin of error, therefore, the prediction was well within that? Conversely, somebody being up 10 points, in numerous polls, and ultimately losing, is NOT within the margin of error of organizations which have been in business for about 75 years and, overall, have a good record. You have yet to talk to someboy who has participated in a survey? Does the expression "small sample" mean anything? You feel qualified to state that there is a silent majority (which, again, did NOT manifest itself in 2016) that doesn't want their political leanings known? Your final sentence is absolute and complete conjecture, backed by ZIP, not to mention, it's MY "feeling" that most people don't bother to put signs on their yard no matter WHO they support, so, why you attach so much importance to that act is curious, to say the least.

 

[savage1]

So, you supposedly had an inside look at a small polling org., but you imagine that whatever it is that you saw is "not unique." Why is that? Also, are you aware that, on average, that HRC was expected to win the popular vote by 3%, and she won by 2.1%? Do you know that, generally speaking, being off 3 or 4 per cent is the margin of error, therefore, the prediction was well within that? Conversely, somebody being up 10 points, in numerous polls, and ultimately losing, is NOT within the margin of error of organizations which have been in business for about 75 years and, overall, have a good record. You have yet to talk to someboy who has participated in a survey? Does the expression "small sample" mean anything? You feel qualified to state that there is a silent majority (which, again, did NOT manifest itself in 2016) that doesn't want their political leanings known? Your final sentence is absolute and complete conjecture, backed by ZIP, not to mention, it's MY "feeling" that most people don't bother to put signs on their yard no matter WHO they support, so, why you attach so much importance to that act is curious, to say the least.

Jdub94 should stick to subjects about which he has knowledge, rather than in polling data, which in the post you are referencing shows 100% ignorance

and which is based 100% on hopes and emotions!!

 

[Dafinch]

Jdub94 should stick to subjects about which he has knowledge, rather than in polling data, which in the post you are referencing shows 100% ignorance

and which is based 100% on hopes and emotions!!

Yeah, I'm getting that, lol.

 

[savage1]

As I said before, one of the most telling and irritating traits these Trumps folks here is that anything which reflects badly upon Trump as fake news,

and rejecting polling data right along since the campaign started is a perfect example of that.

I mean I would respect them a lot more if they at least acknowledged that Trump was behind, but still felt confident that he could win in the time remaining.

Then again though and in all fairness, all they are doing is using the same modus operandi at their Donny, their hero/deity.