Trump will be -150 before Nov 3rd! Yes or no?

[CHOPTALK]

Crudebar is right .

Just saying

I have no dog in this fight .

 

[stock07]

Gawd. Not much annoys me in life. But this shits really gets under my skin.

Let's welch but pretend it's because we didn't understand the bet.

I will say you got nuts...

But come on wood betting strangers on a anonymous Internet forum and then acting like you a surprised when someone Welch’s...LoL

Did you not learn the last time with the standfordsam situation...

 

[Willie99]

I will say you got nuts...

But come on wood betting strangers on a anonymous Internet forum and then acting like you a surprised when someone Welch’s...LoL

Did you not learn the last time with the standfordsam situation...

are you sure Crude is Woodstool? Doesn't seem it to me

Woodstool was calling me a stiff on the night of the election even before the polls were closed because he wanted me to pay based on a projection. Even started a thread calling me a stiff, and I paid him on Wednesday (in less than 24 hours). So I didn't like that much

 

[stock07]

are you sure Crude is Woodstool? Doesn't seem it to me

Woodstool was calling me a stiff on the night of the election even before the polls were closed because he wanted me to pay based on a projection. Even started a thread calling me a stiff, and I paid him on Wednesday (in less than 24 hours). So I didn't like that much

I’m just going to say this Willie...

I believe in second chances and if a man puts his money up first and throws his nuts on the table like Crude did either way I gotta give the man props...

Only point I was trying to make is people seem to act surprised when some stranger stiffs them on a internet bet...

But he did take his stand put his money where his mouth is and that is worth something in my book...

 

[crudebar]

Willie,

You are holding the money. I showed you what i offered Michanegelo and what he accepted. He has offered evidence of a broad bet that i offered another poster. Of which had Tater accepted we would have then discussed specifics before money was sent. Michanegleo accepted, specifics were discussed, he accepted and money was sent.

But you are obviously holding the funds.

 

[stock07]

Crudebar is right .

Just saying

I have no dog in this fight .

No dog in the fight either but I agree with Chop...

Crude is right...

Go back and read post #39 in this thread it clearly states 7am.

 

[crudebar]

"This will be he same with +105 or better. If Trump is at +105 or better before the election at bookmaker.eu you win. If he isn't but even if Trump wins the election you still lose."

yep. That is fine.

But I'm concerned for the other bet. I don't want bookmaker.eu deciding what to do with the bet if one of the contingencies I listed were to develop. I want the bet to still stand between you and I.

If you can live with the bet despite the possibility of the contingencies I listed, we've got a bet.

Thanks.

I mean how could this not be more clear? post 42.

Wasting so much time on this. Obviously this is starting to turn into exactly what i was hoping wouldn't happen.

 

[PatsFan1283]

I got an opinion on this but it isn't gonna yield a solution.

Mich is actually right, Crude did NOT define the terms of the bet correctly. The spirit of the bet and what it was should be is absolutely obvious to anyone, but he just didn't. You know who defined the terms of the bet correctly? Me when I offered people the same bet on page 3 and said at 11:50pm on Nov 2nd. I.e the night before the election.

However, obviously if Trump were to get over +105 at 5-1, why would Woodstool do that? he could just bet Biden to win outright laying less than 2-1. That makes absolutely no sense.


So Crude didn't cross his t's and dot his i's to make sure Mich understood the wager. However, I have no clue what Mich was thinking that he would get 5-1 at any time intra-day (who would do that? That's absurd)

I think Mich should pay but if he didn't want to I can't fault him for it. If you're gonna bet people on an anonymous forum about stuff like this, you gotta do a better job defining the parameters even if common sense clearly dictates what the bet should've been.


(I believe this is correct but I didn't read every single post so could be wrong)

 

[crudebar]

I got an opinion on this but it isn't gonna yield a solution.

Mich is actually right, Crude did NOT define the terms of the bet correctly. The spirit of the bet and what it was should be is absolutely obvious to anyone, but he just didn't. You know who defined the terms of the bet correctly? Me when I offered people the same bet on page 3 and said at 11:50pm on Nov 2nd. I.e the night before the election.

However, obviously if Trump were to get over +105 at 5-1, why would Woodstool do that? he could just bet Biden to win outright laying less than 2-1. That makes absolutely no sense.


So Crude didn't cross his t's and dot his i's to make sure Mich understood the wager. However, I have no clue what Mich was thinking that he would get 5-1 at any time intra-day (who would do that? That's absurd)

I think Mich should pay but if he didn't want to I can't fault him for it. If you're gonna bet people on an anonymous forum about stuff like this, you gotta do a better job defining the parameters even if common sense clearly dictates what the bet should've been.


(I believe this is correct but I didn't read every single post so could be wrong)

If you read post 42, how is that not clear?

 

[PatsFan1283]

If you read post 42, how is that not clear?

I guess he is saying "before the election" means before the results are in? But the 7AM part in another post would obviously prove that isn't what he is saying.

I'd have to hear his side of the story I guess but yeah, if he acknowledged the 7AM part I dunno what the issue is.

 

[crudebar]

I guess he is saying "before the election" means before the results are in? But the 7AM part in another post would obviously prove that isn't what he is saying.

I'd have to hear his side of the story I guess but yeah, if he acknowledged the 7AM part I dunno what the issue is.

Willie came up with the idea of first poll close. I told him that was a good idea and extended Michaneglo to that. So it turned into "before the election starts"

 

[PatsFan1283]

At first poll close, Biden was still > -150, right?

I didn't track all the intraday stuff but that seems correct

 

[crudebar]

At first poll close, Biden was still > -150, right?

I didn't track all the intraday stuff but that seems correct

Yeah. His bet was never close. The bet was strictly on odds at bookmaker.eu. But not like any book had Trump +105 or better before vote came out to the public.

 

[crudebar]

He only lost $250. Unless he thinks this also gets him out of his $500 Trump winning the election bet also.

 

[stock07]

are you sure Crude is Woodstool? Doesn't seem it to me

Woodstool was calling me a stiff on the night of the election even before the polls were closed because he wanted me to pay based on a projection. Even started a thread calling me a stiff, and I paid him on Wednesday (in less than 24 hours). So I didn't like that much

Absolutely positive crude is woodstool...

Random internet bets with strangers...drama about the outcome and payment...”new members”(obvious ghost)coming to his defense...not even a question willie.

It is clear as glass...

He knows I 100% know...but that is neither here nor there...

He posted up his money and that had to be respected...

But gezzz now we have to go days upon days of his drama arguing about winning or losing a bet...

 

[CHOPTALK]

I guess he is saying "before the election" means before the results are in? But the 7AM part in another post would obviously prove that isn't what he is saying.

I'd have to hear his side of the story I guess but yeah, if he acknowledged the 7AM part I dunno what the issue is.

In the court of law mich is right but in a sports bar setting I think everyone should know the intent of the bet .

If Mich wants to be an ass about it I guess he could be but he don’t strike me as that type .

I think anyone with any sense knows what the intentions of this bet was regardless of the fact that both sides did a very poor job making it clear

 

[MAGAking1]

In the court of law mich is right but in a sports bar setting I think everyone should know the intent of the bet .

If Mich wants to be an ass about it I guess he could be but he don’t strike me as that type .

I think anyone with any sense knows what the intentions of this bet was regardless of the fact that both sides did a very poor job making it clear

Chop is late on the scene with ANOTHER incorrect take.
Bet was clear. LOL in a court of law.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Ok whatever .
How did your election predictions turn out ?

Oh you said trump in landslide .

Great call .

 

[CHOPTALK]

Chop is late on the scene with ANOTHER incorrect take.
Bet was clear. LOL in a court of law.

The bet was not as clear as it should have been .

 

[Willie99]

Ok whatever .
How did your election predictions turn out ?

Oh you said trump in landslide .

Great call .

The worldwide pandemic and Floyd's death that democrats and their criminal corrupt colluding always lying media blamed on Trump and really stupid people swallowed whole without reflux changed that

Throw in ballot harvesting which democrats enabled and blamed it on... wait for it... the pandemic and baddafuckingbing, a senile old man with really stupid ideas looks like he's going to squeak out a close election



PS: I'm not calling you any of those names, although there are at least 10 posters around here that fit all those descriptions to a T