- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,536
- Reaction score
- 1,218
What crime did she commit and if it was a wrong why isn’t she behind bars now Or at least charged and going thru what DJT went through? It’s all done and over for him and we survived and can now watch DJT use his power. It will be as it always was meant to be.
The Book of Law will be followed for the next 4 years…. Bank on-it!
The Book of Law will be followed for the next 4 years…. Bank on-it!
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,536
- Reaction score
- 1,218
Okay I used common sense…..
TOTAL DISASTER! Letitia James knows this, but doesn’t care – To her, it’s just a Political Campaign. So sad for our Country,” Trump wrote in September.
We are about to enter a political period that will have consequences for the rest of our lives. We cannot give up,” Ocasio-Cortez noted.
Adding this together “Common Sense” will tell teach them the “Book of Law” is the rule in America. I credit these ladies for their education butt both of them I hope remember the next 4 years are not going to be like the past 4!
This fucken evil cunt and her lawfare bullshit will cost her - most importantly, the 450M judgment looks like it is not getting reduced - IT IS GOING TO $0.00 - in a nutshell, NY has never prosecuted ANYONE where the mortgagee has paid the loan in compliance and in full and the bank said they were happy to to the loan and would do it again
Members of the five-judge panel on the Appellate Division - the mid-level state appellate court hearing arguments in Trump's appeal - appeared concerned about possible overreach by James.
Two of the judges interrupted Judith Vale, the lawyer arguing for New York, during her opening statement to ask if there were any other examples of the state suing over private business transactions between sophisticated parties under a law aimed at protecting market integrity.
"EVERY case that you cite involves damage to consumers, damage to the marketplace," Justice David Friedman told Vale.
"We don't have anything like that here," Friedman added, saying that nobody "lost any money."
The judges also wondered about what constraints applied to the law James cited in bringing the case - one that is typically used to go after fraudsters who target vulnerable consumers.
Members of the five-judge panel on the Appellate Division - the mid-level state appellate court hearing arguments in Trump's appeal - appeared concerned about possible overreach by James.
Two of the judges interrupted Judith Vale, the lawyer arguing for New York, during her opening statement to ask if there were any other examples of the state suing over private business transactions between sophisticated parties under a law aimed at protecting market integrity.
"EVERY case that you cite involves damage to consumers, damage to the marketplace," Justice David Friedman told Vale.
"We don't have anything like that here," Friedman added, saying that nobody "lost any money."
The judges also wondered about what constraints applied to the law James cited in bringing the case - one that is typically used to go after fraudsters who target vulnerable consumers.
This is really good news that our appellate courts (even in the most liberal states) respect law.
The Carroll judgment will be a tougher battle because the trial court did find that he defamed her - of course, the 80M judgment is a fucken hoax but I don't want it reduced to 10M - I want is at $0.00 - I want her cunt attorneys to have worked for 3 years for free
The Carroll judgment will be a tougher battle because the trial court did find that he defamed her - of course, the 80M judgment is a fucken hoax but I don't want it reduced to 10M - I want is at $0.00 - I want her cunt attorneys to have worked for 3 years for free
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 115,460
- Reaction score
- 6,899
Fat ass tranny
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,536
- Reaction score
- 1,218
Leticia remember you are fighting DJT and his crew not the old regime. He will not turn his head and will follow the Book of Law that applies to ALL. Maybe if Biden and Company cared they would have given you a pardon!
NY AG Letitia James Declares Virginia Home Her ‘Principal Residence’
TRUTH. Staff
7 minutes ago
5 min read 14836 views
Letitia James, New York’s Attorney General, has built her career on exposing deception. But a quiet real estate transaction in Norfolk, Virginia—carried out just weeks before the Trump fraud trial she championed—now raises serious questions about her own compliance with New York law.
A declaration buried in legal filings states her intent to make a Virginia house her principal residence:
“I HEREBY DECLARE that I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.”
Those words appear in black and white in a Specific Power of Attorney, signed by James and filed in Norfolk on August 17, 2023, authorizing her relative Shamice Thompson-Hairston to act on her behalf in a transaction that included the declaration. They were not written by a lawyer acting on James’ behalf. They were her words. Her intent. Her signature.
This signed power of attorney is a smoking gun on its own, completely separate from how the mortgage might be interpreted. It stands as a clear declaration of intent from a sitting New York Attorney General to establish principal residency in another state.
While joint ownership arrangements sometimes involve owners with different primary residences, this case is different. The declaration in the power of attorney specifically states James’s intention to make the property her principal residence, and the mortgage requires both borrowers to establish residency. This raises questions about whether such a declaration was made primarily to secure preferential mortgage terms.
Importantly, this is not an isolated incident—discrepancies in James’s mortgage filings appear to follow a longer-term pattern, raising broader questions about disclosure consistency.
If James never intended to make the Norfolk property her principal residence despite signing a document explicitly stating that intention, the declaration may constitute misrepresentation under federal fraud statutes. This would be particularly problematic for someone who has prosecuted others for similar misrepresentations in property matters.
And this declaration came at a remarkable moment. Because on October 2—less than seven weeks later—James would take to the courtroom steps in Manhattan to announce the start of her landmark civil fraud case against Donald Trump. The trial would span months and dominate headlines. James would be in New York nearly every day.
The Facts
The Virginia property at 604 Sterling Street was purchased for $240,000 with a $219,780 mortgage. The deed lists James and Thompson-Hairston as co-owners in “joint tenancy with right of survivorship as at common law,” meaning both have equal ownership rights. The property is a 1,450 square foot single-family home with 3 bedrooms and 1 bathroom, built in 1947.
The transaction was completed on August 30, 2023, with Thompson-Hairston signing the mortgage documents both for herself and as attorney-in-fact for James. What makes this transaction particularly troubling is that the mortgage documents require both borrowers to make the property their principal residence within 60 days (by approximately October 30, 2023) and maintain it for at least one year—placing the occupancy deadline squarely during the Trump trial.
This creates a direct conflict with James’ duties as New York Attorney General, where she maintained an active public presence throughout this period. The timing could not be more problematic—at the very moment she declared her intent to establish Virginia residency, she was preparing for her most high-profile case in New York.
The Legal Requirements
This isn’t simply a matter of having multiple homes. New York Public Officers Law § 3(1) is unambiguous: “No person shall be capable of holding a civil office who shall not… have resided in this state” for the required period. The State Constitution Article XIII, Section 13(a) specifically requires the Attorney General to be “a resident of the state for five years immediately preceding election.”Furthermore, Public Officers Law § 30(1)(d) mandates that an office becomes vacant when the officeholder ceases “to be an inhabitant of the state.”
The consequences under New York law are immediate and severe: when an officeholder moves outside the required jurisdiction, they can no longer legally hold their position.
“When an officeholder removes his residence from the territorial limits required by statute, the office is rendered vacant.”
If James declared Virginia as her principal residence—which the power of attorney clearly shows was her intention—she may have triggered an automatic vacancy in the office of Attorney General under New York law—potentially invalidating her authority during the very period she was prosecuting her highest-profile case.
Financial Considerations
Beyond the legal implications, there are also financial questions surrounding this transaction. Standard mortgage requirements for owner-occupied properties, such as those documented in federal housing forms, typically offer substantially lower interest rates than investment properties—often 0.5-0.75 percentage points less, translating to thousands in savings on a $219,780 mortgage.The financial motivation behind claiming a property as a primary residence is significant—and raises troubling questions about whether this declaration was made for financial benefit rather than reflecting actual living arrangements.
Disclosure Questions
The pattern of questionable documentation extends to James’ official disclosures. Her 2023 Financial Disclosure Statement includes an earlier Virginia property, 3121 Perrone Avenue, Norfolk from 2020, but nothing about the Sterling Street transaction. There is no reference to the Sterling Street property or the $219,780 mortgage in the 2023 FDS, despite its joint ownership and recent purchase date.According to New York ethics guidelines, jointly owned real estate may be exempt from disclosure only if it is used solely as a primary or secondary residence and does not generate income. If the Sterling Street property is being rented or used as an investment, the omission could constitute a violation of public officers law.
The question becomes: How many undisclosed properties exist, and why the apparent effort to keep them off official records?
Why It Matters
The Attorney General holds a unique position of public trust. James won a $350 million verdict against Trump for misrepresentations in property valuations. The central claim in that case—that Trump misrepresented property values and usage for financial gain—bears a troubling similarity to the questions now surrounding James’s own real estate declarations.These questions take on even greater weight considering James has already registered a campaign committee—James for NY 2026 – Attorney General (ID 308810)—and filed campaign finance disclosures as early as July 17, 2023 (before signing the power of attorney), with the most recent filed on January 15, 2025 (after signing the power of attorney). This demonstrates her clear intention to seek re-election both before and after declaring her intent to make Virginia her principal residence.
Under the New York State Constitution, candidates for Attorney General must have been residents of New York for five consecutive years immediately preceding the election. If James’s sworn declaration in 2023 reflected a change in domicile to Virginia, even temporarily, it could jeopardize her eligibility to run again in 2026.
Four key questions remain unanswered:
- Why did James explicitly declare her intent to make Virginia her principal residence while serving as New York’s Attorney General?
- Did she fulfill the 60-day occupancy requirement in her mortgage while simultaneously appearing in New York courts?
- Can she document continued New York residency during this period sufficient to maintain her legal authority as Attorney General?
- Will this affect her eligibility to run for re-election, which requires uninterrupted New York residency?
NY AG Letitia James Declares Virginia Home Her ‘Principal Residence’ | Truth Press
Letitia James, New York’s Attorney General, has built her career on exposing deception. But a quiet real estate transaction in Norfolk, Virginia—carried out just weeks before the Trump fraud trial she championed—now raises serious questions about her own compliance with New York law. A...
truthpress.com
Fox News
dnersoptoS7iu19htf2hllt36cl1g0ff83001a44il6cmmt0ga0gttgm7150 · New York Attorney General Letitia James faces mortgage fraud allegations stemming from property purchases decades ago in which she allegedly listed her father as her husband.
foxnews.com
Trump administration refers NY AG Letitia James for possible prosecution over
We checkmated your king and now you are bragging about attacking our Pawn? I had to look up who this woman was never heard of her.
When are the hangings you peasants promised? Just like the Doge fraud, or 75 nations negotiating trade deals "Where Are They"
When are the hangings you peasants promised? Just like the Doge fraud, or 75 nations negotiating trade deals "Where Are They"
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 115,460
- Reaction score
- 6,899
Karma Mrs. LeBozzie
Trump Flips the Script on Letitia James
SR thanks for bumping the thread up...
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
Brian Craig Show
Brian Craig Show
96.1K subscribers
You start a thread with this headline bragging about your political IQ People say "Code how are your predictions so accurate" some is genius, but most is political IQ but you never heard of NY Atty General Letitia James?.... Big political rock you've been under for about 3 years...We checkmated your king and now you are bragging about attacking our Pawn? I had to look up who this woman was never heard of her.
When are the hangings you peasants promised? Just like the Doge fraud, or 75 nations negotiating trade deals "Where Are They"
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,536
- Reaction score
- 1,218
Good read SR…. “Do as I say not as I Do” Hope this case closes in 168 weeks for LJ……. Read she listed her and and her husband on a document then on another she lives with her father and someone asked if she is married to her father. She’s gots some explainings to do’s…,?…?…. 
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 115,460
- Reaction score
- 6,899
